John H. McWhorter. 2018. The Creole Debate

References

1. Bickerton, Derek
   1981 Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Booij, Gert
   1996 “Inherent versus Contextual Inflection and the Split Morphology Hypothesis”. InGeert Booij, and Jaap van Marle, eds.Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–16. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3716‑6_1
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3716-6_1 [Google Scholar]
3. Chambers, Jack
   1995 Sociolinguistic Theory (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chomsky, Noam
   1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Givón, Talmy
   1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mufwene, Salikoko S.
   2001 The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
7. Parkvall, Mikael, Peter Bakker, and John H. McWhorter
   2018 “Creoles and Sociolinguistic Complexity: Response to Ansaldo”. Language Sciences66: 226–233. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.10.001 [Google Scholar]
8. Spitzer, Leo
   ed. 1922 Hugo Schuchardt-Brevier: Ein Vademecum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chomsky, Noam
   1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chomsky, Noam
    1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chomsky, Noam
    1973 “Conditions on Transformations”. InStephen R. Anderson, and Paul Kiparsky, eds.A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 232–286.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik
    1977 “Filters and Control”. Linguistic Inquiry8: 425–504.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chomsky, Noam
    1988 Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]