A socio­linguistic perspective on the (quasi-)modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English

References

1. Baker, Paul
   2011 “Times May Change, but We Will Always Have Money: Diachronic Variation in Recent British English”. Journal of English Linguistics39: 65–88. 10.1177/0075424210368368
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424210368368 [Google Scholar]
2. Close, Joanne and Bas Aarts
   2010 “Current Change in the Modal System of English: A Case Study of Must, Have to and Have Got To”. InUrsula Lenker, Judith Hurber, and Robert Mailhammer, eds.English Historical Linguistics 2008. Vol. 1: The History of English Verbal and Nominal Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165–182. 10.1075/cilt.314.13clo
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.314.13clo [Google Scholar]
3. Coates, Jennifer
   1983 The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Collins, Peter C.
   1991 “The Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Australian English”. InKarin Aijmer, and Bengt Altenberg, eds.English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 145–165.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Collins, Peter C.
   2005 “The Modals and Quasi-Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Australian English and Other Englishes”. English World-Wide26: 249–273. 10.1075/eww.26.3.02col
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.26.3.02col [Google Scholar]
6. Collins, Peter C.
   2007 “Modal Wars: Some Ascendant Semi-Modals in Australian English”. InJeff Siegel, John Lynch, and Diana Eades, eds.Language Description, History and Development: Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry Crowley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 197–208. 10.1075/cll.30.21col
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.30.21col [Google Scholar]
7. Collins, Peter C.
   2009a Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042029095
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029095 [Google Scholar]
8. Collins, Peter C.
   2009b “Modals and Quasi-Modals”. InPeter C. Collins, Pam Peters, and Adam Smith, eds.Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–88. 10.1075/veaw.g39.05col
   https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g39.05col [Google Scholar]
9. Collins, Peter C.
   2014 “Quasi-Modals and Modals in Australian English Fiction 1800–1999, with Comparisons across British and American English”. Journal of English Linguistics42: 7–30. 10.1177/0075424213512857
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213512857 [Google Scholar]
10. Denis, Derek and Alexandra D’Arcy
    2019 “Deriving Homogeneity in a Settler Colonial Variety of English”. American Speech94: 223–258. 10.1215/00031283‑7277054
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-7277054 [Google Scholar]
11. Depraetere, Ilse and Susan Reed
    2006 “Mood and Modality in English”. InBas Aarts, and April McMahon, eds.Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 269–290. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch12 [Google Scholar]
12. Downes, William
    1998 Language and Society (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163781
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163781 [Google Scholar]
13. Fehringer, Carol and Karen P. Corrigan
    2015 “‘You’ve Got to Sort of Eh Hoy the Geordie Out’: Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Fifty Years of Tyneside English”. English Language and Linguistics19: 355–381. 10.1017/S1360674315000131
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674315000131 [Google Scholar]
14. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hansen, Beke
    2018 Corpus Linguistics and Sociolinguistics: A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal Systems of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004381520
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004381520 [Google Scholar]
16. Hoffman, Michol F. and James A. Walker
    2014 “‘Toronto Has Everything’, ‘Toronto’s Got It All’: Ethnolinguistic Dimensions of Have in Toronto English”. Paper presented atNew Ways of Analyzing Variation 43, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and University of Illinois at Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
18. Jankowski, Bridget
    2004 “A Transatlantic Perspective of Variation and Change in English Deontic Modality”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics23: 85–113.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Johnson, Daniel Ezra
    2017 Rbrul (Version 3.1.1) www.danielezrajohnson.com/rbrul.html.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Krug, Manfred G.
    2000 Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110820980
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820980 [Google Scholar]
21. Labov, William
    1963 “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change”. Word19: 273–309. 10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799 [Google Scholar]
22. Labov, William
    2001 Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Leech, Geoffrey N.
    2013 “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. InJuana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds.English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 95–115. 10.1515/9783110286328.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110286328.95 [Google Scholar]
24. Leech, Geoffrey N., Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
    2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
25. Lowry, Richard
    2011–2017 Vassar Stats. Vassar College, Poughkeepsie vassarstats.net/.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mair, Christian
    2014 “Do We Got a Difference? Divergent Developments of Semi-Auxiliary (Have) Got (to) in British and American English”. InMarianne Hundt, ed.Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–76. 10.1017/CBO9781139507226.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507226.006 [Google Scholar]
27. Nokkonen, Soili
    2010 “‘How Many Taxis There Needs to Be?’ The Sociolinguistic Variation of Need to in Spoken British English”. Corpora5: 45–74. 10.3366/cor.2010.0003
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2010.0003 [Google Scholar]
28. Palmer, Frank
    1990 Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Penry Williams, Cara
    2018 “The Analytic Importance of Metapragmatics in Variationist Methodology: Voicings within Australian English”. Paper presented atSociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Penry Williams, Cara
    2019a “Appeals to Semiotic Registers in Ethno-Metapragmatic Accounts of Variation”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology29: 294–313. 10.1111/jola.12213
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12213 [Google Scholar]
31. Penry Williams, Cara
    2019b Folklinguistics and Social Meaning in Australian English. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429001116
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429001116 [Google Scholar]
32. Penry Williams, Cara and Minna Korhonen
    2018 “Variation and Change in Possession and Root Modality in Australian English: The Declining Fortunes of Have Got”. Paper presented atSociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Smith, Nicholas
    2003 “Changes in the Modals and Semi-Modals of Strong Obligation and Epistemic Necessity in Recent British English”. InRoberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, and Manfred Krug, eds.Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 241–266. 10.1515/9783110895339.241
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895339.241 [Google Scholar]
34. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2004 “Have to, Gotta, Must?: Grammaticalisation, Variation and Specialization in English Deontic Modality”. InHans Lindquist, and Christian Mair, eds.Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 33–55. 10.1075/scl.13.04tag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.13.04tag [Google Scholar]
35. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2012 Roots of English: Exploring the History of Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139046718
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046718 [Google Scholar]
36. Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D’Arcy
    2007 “The Modals of Obligation/Necessity in Canadian Perspective”. English World-Wide28: 47–87. 10.1075/eww.28.1.04tag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.1.04tag [Google Scholar]
37. Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Jennifer Smith
    2006 “Layering, Competition and a Twist of Fate: Deontic Modality in Dialects of English”. Diachronica23: 341–380. 10.1075/dia.23.2.06tag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.06tag [Google Scholar]
38. Tannen, Deborah
    1986 “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative”. InFlorian Coulmas, ed.Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 311–332. 10.1515/9783110871968.311
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.311 [Google Scholar]
39. Trousdale, Graeme
    2003 “Simplification and Redistribution: An Account of Modal Verb Usage in Tyneside English”. English World-Wide24: 271–284. 10.1075/eww.24.2.07tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.24.2.07tro [Google Scholar]
40. Walker, James A. and Michol F. Hoffman
    2016 “Ethnolinguistic Variation in Toronto English: Possession and Deontic Modality”. Paper presented at theAnnual meeting of American Linguistics Society, Marriott Marquis Washington, DC.
    [Google Scholar]