Volume 41, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Quotative has been described as “one of the most striking developments [in English]” (Tagliamonte and D’Arcy 2004: 493). Despite the vast research on quotatives and the upsurge of , the potential impact of discourse type on the grammar of quotation has rarely been assessed. Yet, discourse type has proved a relevant factor in linguistic variation (see Travis 2007Buchstaller 2011Travis and Lindstrom 2016). Drawing on vernacular spoken data from our multigenerational corpus of Australian English, we include discourse type as a predictor in our recursive partitioning and logistic regression models. Our results show that similar linguistic constraints operate on across discourse types. However, significant differences emerge regarding its social conditioning in narrative as opposed to non-narrative discourse, pointing to a strong association between and female storytelling.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Richard, Sophie
    2013–2016UWA Narrative Corpus. Compiled atUniversity of Western Australia, Discipline of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
    2011–2019UWA Corpus of English in Australia. Compiled atUniversity of Western Australia, Discipline of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blyth, Carl , Sigrid Recktenwald , and Jenny Wang
    1990 “‘I’m Like, ‘Say What?!’’: A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative”. American Speech65: 215–227. 10.2307/455910
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455910 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, LeAnn and Sali Tagliamonte
    2012 “A Very Interesting Story: The Influence of Narrative in Linguistic Change”. Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics18: Article 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchstaller, Isabelle
    2006a “Diagnostics of Age-Graded Linguistic Behaviour: The Case of the Quotative System”. Journal of Sociolinguistics10: 3–30. 10.1111/j.1360‑6441.2006.00315.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00315.x [Google Scholar]
  6. 2006b “Social Stereotypes, Personality Traits and Regional Perception Displaced: Attitudes Towards the ‘New’ Quotatives in the U.K.”. Journal of Sociolinguistics10: 362–381. 10.1111/j.1360‑6441.2006.00332.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00332.x [Google Scholar]
  7. 2011 “Quotations Across the Generations: A Multivariate Analysis of Speech and Thought Introducers Across 5 Decades of Tyneside Speech”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory7: 59–92. 10.1515/cllt.2011.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2011.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2014Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2015 “Exploring Linguistic Malleability Across the Life Span: Age-Specific Patterns in Quotative Use”. Language in Society44: 457–496. 10.1017/S0047404515000391
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000391 [Google Scholar]
  10. Buchstaller, Isabelle and Alexandra D’Arcy
    2009 “Localized Globalization: A Multi-Local, Multivariate Investigation of Quotative Be Like ”. Journal of Sociolinguistics13: 291–331. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00412.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00412.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Butters, Ronald
    1980 “Narrative Go ‘Say’”. American Speech55: 304–307. 10.2307/454573
    https://doi.org/10.2307/454573 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1982 “Editor’s Note [on ‘Be Like’]”. American Speech57: 149.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheshire, Jenny
    2000 “The Telling or the Tale? Narratives and Gender in Adolescent Friendship Networks”. Journal of Sociolinguistics4: 234–262. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00113
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00113 [Google Scholar]
  14. Coates, Jennifer
    1996Women Talk: Conversation Between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cukor-Avila, Patricia
    2002 “ She Say, She Go, She Be Like: Verbs of Quotation Over Time in African American Vernacular English”. American Speech77: 3–31. 10.1215/00031283‑77‑1‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-77-1-3 [Google Scholar]
  16. D’Arcy, Alexandra
    2004 “Contextualizing St. John’s Youth English Within the Canadian Quotative System”. Journal of English Linguistics32: 323–345. 10.1177/0075424204269752
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204269752 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2012 “The Diachrony of Quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English”. Language Variation and Change24: 343–369. 10.1017/S0954394512000166
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000166 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2018aDiscourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context: Eight Hundred Years of Like. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2018b “Linguists Be Like: ‘Where Did It Come From?’”. Paper presented atNew Ways of Analyzing Variation 47, New York University.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer
    2000 “The Sociolinguistic Distribution of and Attitudes Toward Focuser Like and Quotative Like ”. Journal of Sociolinguistics4: 60–80. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00103
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00103 [Google Scholar]
  21. Davydova, Julia
    2020 “The Role of Sociocognitive Salience in the L2 Acquisition of Structured Variation and Linguistic Diffusion: Evidence from Quotative Be Like .” Language in Society49: 1–26. 10.1017/S0047404519001003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519001003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Davydova, Julia and Isabelle Buchstaller
    2015 “Expanding the Circle to Learner English: Investigating Quotative Marking in a German Student Community”. American Speech90: 441–478. 10.1215/00031283‑3442128
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3442128 [Google Scholar]
  23. Denis, Derek , Matt Gardner , Marisa Brook , and Sali Tagliamonte
    2019 “Peaks and Arrowheads of Vernacular Organization”. Language Variation and Change31: 43–67. 10.1017/S095439451900005X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439451900005X [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferrara, Kathleen and Barbara Bell
    1995 “Sociolinguistic Variation and Discourse Function of Constructed Dialogue Introducers: The Case of Be + Like ”. American Speech70: 265–290. 10.2307/455900
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455900 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fleischman, Suzanne
    1990Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fox, Sue
    2012 “Performed Narrative: The Pragmatic Function of This Is + Speaker and Other Quotatives in London Adolescent Speech”. In Isabelle Buchstaller , and Ingrid van Alphen , eds.Quotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 231–258. 10.1075/celcr.15.14fox
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.14fox [Google Scholar]
  27. Guy, Gregory
    1988 “Advanced Varbrul Analysis”. In Kathleen Ferrara , Becky Brown , Keith Walters , and John Baugh , eds.Linguistic Change and Contact. Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin, 124–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Holmes, Janet
    1997 “Story-Telling in New Zealand Women’s and Men’s Talk.” In Ruth Wodak , ed.Gender and Discourse. London: Sage, 263–293. 10.4135/9781446250204.n12
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250204.n12 [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson, Daniel Ezra
    2009 “Getting Off the Goldvarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed Effects Variable Rule Analysis”. Language and Linguistics Compass3: 359–383. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Johnstone, Barbara
    1987 “‘He Says... So I Said’: Verb Tense Alternation and Narrative Depictions of Authority in American English”. Linguistics25: 33–52. 10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.33
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1987.25.1.33 [Google Scholar]
  31. Labov, William
    1972Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1984 “Field Methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation”. In John Baugh and Joel Sherzer , eds.Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 28–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1997 “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis”. The Journal of Narrative and Life History7: 395–415. 10.1075/jnlh.7.49som
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som [Google Scholar]
  34. 2001Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Labov, William and Joshua Waletzky
    1967 “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience”. In June Helm , ed.Essays in the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: Washington University Press, 12–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Macaulay, Ronald
    2001 “ You’re Like ‘Why Not?’: The Quotative Expression of Glasgow Adolescents”. Journal of Sociolinguistics5: 3–21. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00135
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00135 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rickford, John R. and Faye McNair-Knox
    1994 “Addressee- and Topic-Influenced Style Shift”. In Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan , eds.Sociolinguistics Perspectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 235–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Richard, Sophie
    2018 “Tense/Aspect Variation and the Present Perfect in Australian English Narratives: Sociolinguistic Constraints and Discourse-Pragmatic Functions”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Australia.
  39. Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
    2013 “Quotatives Down Under: Be Like in Cross-Generational Australian English Speech”. English World-Wide34: 48–76. 10.1075/eww.34.1.03rod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.34.1.03rod [Google Scholar]
  40. 2016 “Quotatives Across Time: West Australian English Then and Now”. In Heike Pichler , ed.Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–159. 10.1017/CBO9781107295476.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295476.007 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodríguez Louro, Celeste and Marie-Eve Ritz
    2014 “Stories Down Under: Tense Variation at the Heart of Australian English Narratives”. Australian Journal of Linguistics34: 540–556.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Romaine, Suzanne and Deborah Lange
    1991 “The Use of Like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought”. American Speech66: 227–279. 10.2307/455799
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455799 [Google Scholar]
  43. Schnell, Stefan and Danielle Barth
    2018 “Discourse Motivations for Pronominal and Zero Objects Across Registers in Vera’a”. Language Variation and Change30: 51–81. 10.1017/S0954394518000054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394518000054 [Google Scholar]
  44. Scrivner, Olga and Manuel Díaz-Campos
    . n.d. “Language Variation Suite” https://languagevariationsuite.shinyapps.io/Pages/ (accessedNovember 20, 2019; May 10, 2020).
  45. Tagliamonte, Sali
    2006Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2012Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tagliamonte, Sali and Alexandra D’Arcy
    2004 “ He’s Like, She’s Like: The Quotative System in Canadian Youth”. Journal of Sociolinguistics8: 493–514. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2004.00271.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00271.x [Google Scholar]
  48. 2007 “Frequency and Variation in the Community Grammar: Tracking a New Change Through the Generations”. Language Variation and Change19: 119–217. 10.1017/S095439450707007X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450707007X [Google Scholar]
  49. 2009 “Peaks Beyond Phonology: Adolescence, Incrementation and Language Change”. Language85: 58–108. 10.1353/lan.0.0084
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0084 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tagliamonte, Sali , Alexandra D’Arcy , and Celeste Rodríguez Louro
    2016 “Outliers, Impact and Rationalization in Linguistic Change”. Language92: 824–849. 10.1353/lan.2016.0074
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0074 [Google Scholar]
  51. Tagliamonte, Sali and Derek Denis
    2014 “Expanding the Transmission/Diffusion Dichotomy: Evidence from Canada”. Language90: 90–136. 10.1353/lan.2014.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0016 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tagliamonte, Sali and Rachael Hudson
    1999 “ Be Like et al. Beyond America: The Quotative System in British and Canadian Youth”. Journal of Sociolinguistics3: 147–172. 10.1111/1467‑9481.00070
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00070 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tannen, Deborah
    1986 “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative”. In Florian Coulmas , ed.Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: De Gruyter, 311–332. 10.1515/9783110871968.311
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871968.311 [Google Scholar]
  54. Travis, Catherine
    2007 “Genre Effects on Subject Expression in Spanish: Priming in Narrative and Conversation”. Language Variation and Change19: 101–135. 10.1017/S0954394507070081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394507070081 [Google Scholar]
  55. Travis, Catherine and Amy M. Lindstrom
    2016 “Different Registers, Different Grammars? Subject Expression in English Conversation and Narrative”. Language Variation and Change28: 103–128. 10.1017/S0954394515000174
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000174 [Google Scholar]
  56. Winter, Joanne
    2002 “Discourse Quotatives in Australian English: Adolescents Performing Voices”. Australian Journal of Linguistics22: 5–21. 10.1080/07268600120122535
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600120122535 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wolfson, Nessa
    1978 “A Feature of Performed Narrative: The Conversational Historical Present”. Language in Society7: 215–237. 10.1017/S0047404500005534
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005534 [Google Scholar]
  58. 1982The Conversational Historical Present in American English Narrative. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110851694
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851694 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error