1887
Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores functions of pseudonyms in written threatening communication from a cognitive sociolinguistic perspective. It addresses the semantic domains present in pseudonyms in a corpus of 19th-century Irish English threatening notices and their cognitive functions in the construction of both cultural-contextualised threat and the threatener’s identity. We identify eight semantic domains that are accessed recurrently in order to create threat. Contributing to the notion of threat involves menacing war, violence, darkness and perdition directly, while also constructing a certain persona for the threatener that highlights their motivation, moral superiority, historical, local and circumstantial expertise, and their physical and mental aptitude. We argue that pseudonyms contribute to the deontic force of the threat by accessing cultural categories and schemas as well as conceptual metaphors and metonymies. Finally, we suggest that pseudonyms function as post-positioned semantic frame setters, providing a cognitive lens through which the entire threatening notice must be interpreted.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00059.pet
2021-01-27
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Gibbons, Stephen Randolph
    2004Captain Rock, Night Errant – The Threatening Letters of Pre-Famine Ireland, 1801–1845. Dublin: Four Courts Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aceto, Michael
    2002 “Ethnic Personal Names and Multiple Identities in Anglophone Caribbean Speech Communities in Latin America”. Language in Society31: 577–608. 10.1017/S0047404502314040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404502314040 [Google Scholar]
  3. Agha, Asif
    2005 “Voice, Footing, Enregisterment”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology15: 38–59. 10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38 [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanco Salgueiro, Antonio
    2010 “Promises, Threats, and the Foundations of Speech Act Theory”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association20: 213–228. 10.1075/prag.20.2.05bla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.2.05bla [Google Scholar]
  5. Brands, Jelle , Tim Schwanen , and Irina van Aalst
    2015 “Fear of Crime and Affective Ambiguities in the Night-Time Economy”. Urban Studies52: 439–455. 10.1177/0042098013505652
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013505652 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brinkman, Inge
    2004 “Languages, Names, and War: The Case of Angola”. African Studies Review47: 143–163. 10.1017/S0002020600030481
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002020600030481 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clare Museum
    Clare Museum 2002 “The Terry Alts”. Clare ChampionNovember15 2002 <www.clarelibrary.ie/eolas/claremuseum/news_events/terry_alts.htm (accessedSeptember 28, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Connolly, Sean J.
    2007 “Caravats and Shanavests”. In Sean J. Connolly . ed.The Oxford Companion to Irish History. Oxford: Oxford University Press www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199234837.001.0001/acref-9780199234837-e-249 (accessedMarch 15, 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dietz, Park Elliot , Daryl B. Matthews , Daniel Allen Martell , Tracy M. Stewart , Debra R. Hrouda , and Janet Warren
    1991 “Threatening and Otherwise Inappropriate Letters to Members of the United States Congress”. Journal of Forensic Science36: 1445–1468.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dobrić, Nikola
    2010 “Theory of Names and Cognitive Linguistics: The Case of the Metaphor”. Filozofija i drustvo21: 135–147. 10.2298/FID1001135D
    https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1001135D [Google Scholar]
  11. Donnelly, James S. Jr.
    2009Captain Rock – The Irish Agrarian Rebellion of 1821–1824. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Felus, Antoni
    1990 “Situational Aspects of Pseudonyms”. Forensic Science International46: 69–75. 10.1016/0379‑0738(90)90137‑N
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(90)90137-N [Google Scholar]
  13. Fraser, Bruce
    1998 “Threatening Revisited”. Forensic Linguistics5: 159–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gales, Tammy
    2011 “Identifying Interpersonal Stance in Threatening Discourse: An Appraisal Analysis”. Discourse Studies13: 27–46. 10.1177/1461445610387735
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610387735 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gash, Norman
    1961Mr Secretary Peel: The Life of Sir Robert Peel to 1830. Harlow: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Guenther, Katja M.
    2009 “The Politics of Names: Rethinking Methodological and Ethical Significance of Naming People, Organizations, and Places”. Qualitative Research9: 411–421. 10.1177/1468794109337872
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109337872 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hickey, Raymond
    2007Irish English: History and Present-Day Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511551048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551048 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2009 “Speech Act Research Between Armchair, Field and Laboratory: The Case of Compliments”. Journal of Pragmatics41: 1611–1635. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kallen, Jeffrey
    2017Irish English. Vol. 2: The Republic of Ireland. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2002Metaphor – A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2015Where Metaphors Come from: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kövecses, Zoltán , and Günter Radden
    1998 “Metonymy: Developing a Cognitive Linguistic View”. Cognitive Linguistics9: 37–78. 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lakoff, George
    2004Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Livia, Anna
    2002 “Public and Clandestine: Gay Men’s Pseudonyms on the French Minitel”. Sexualities5: 201–217. 10.1177/1363460702005002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460702005002004 [Google Scholar]
  27. Maleej, Zouheir , Mohammed Alghbban , and Sami Ben Salamh
    2016 “‘The Fragrance of Flowers’, or Metaphoric and Metonymic Pseudonyms”. Metaphor and Symbol31: 212–229. 10.1080/10926488.2016.1223467
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.1223467 [Google Scholar]
  28. Makoni, Busi
    2016 “Labelling Black Male Genitalia and the ‘New Racism’”. Gender and Language10: 48–72. 10.1558/genl.v10i1.21434
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v10i1.21434 [Google Scholar]
  29. Marks, Isaac M.
    1969Fears and Phobias. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Muschalik, Julia
    2018Threatening in English. A Mixed Method Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.284
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.284 [Google Scholar]
  31. Newell, Stephanie
    2010 “Something to Hide? Anonymity and Pseudonyms in the Colonial West African Press”. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature45: 9–22. 10.1177/0021989409359547
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989409359547 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nini, Andrea
    2017 “Register Variation in Malicious Forensic Texts”. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law24: 67–98. 10.1558/ijsll.30173
    https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.30173 [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Connor, Catherine
    2003 “The Experience of Women in the Rebellion of 1798 in Wexford”. The Past: The Organ of the Uí Cinsealaigh Historical Society24: 95–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ó Cuiv, Brian
    1986 “Irish Language and Literature, 1681–1845”. In Theodore William Moody , and William E. Vaughan . eds.A New History of Ireland. Vol.IV. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 374–423.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. OED Online
    OED Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press https://www.oed.com (accessedSeptember 28, 2018).
  36. Ọlátẹ́jú, Adéṣọlá
    2005 “The Yorùbá Animal Metaphors: Analysis and Interpretation”. Nordic Journal of African Studies14: 368–383.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Peters, Arne
    2017 “Fairies, Banshees, and the Church: Cultural Conceptualisations in Irish English”. International Journal of Language and Culture4: 127–148. 10.1075/ijolc.4.2.01pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.4.2.01pet [Google Scholar]
  38. Plantlife
    Plantlife 2020 “Speedwell” https://www.plantlife.org.uk/uk/discover-wild-plants-nature/plant-fungi-species/speedwell (accessedOctober 20, 2020).
  39. Polzenhagen, Frank , and Hans-Georg Wolf
    2017 “World Englishes and Cognitive Linguistics”. In Markku Filppula , Juhani Klemola , and Devyani Sharma . eds.The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 147–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Room, Adrian
    2010Dictionary of Pseudonyms: 13,000 Assumed Names and their Origins. Jefferson: McFarland.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Searle, John R.
    1975 “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts”. In Keith Gunderson . ed.Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 344–369.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sharifian, Farzad
    2011Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.1 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2015 “Cultural Linguistics and World Englishes”. World Englishes34: 515–532. 10.1111/weng.12156
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12156 [Google Scholar]
  44. Smith, Sharon S.
    2008 “From Violent Words to Violent Deeds? Assessing Risk from FBI Threatening Communication Cases”. In J. Reid Meloy , Lorraine Sheridan , and Jens Hoffmann . eds.Stalking, Threatening, and Attacking Public Figures: A Psychological and Behavioral Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 435–455. 10.1093/med:psych/9780195326383.003.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780195326383.003.0020 [Google Scholar]
  45. Solan, Lawrence M. and Peter Tiersma
    2005Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal Justice. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Thompson, Edward P.
    1975 “The Crime of Anonymity”. In Douglas Hay , Peter Linebaugh , John G. Rule , E. P. Thompson , and Carl Winslow . eds.Albion’s Fatal Tree. Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England. London: Allen Lane, 255–344.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. van Hattum, Marije
    2017 “The Language of ‘Ribbonmen’: A CDA Approach to Identity Construction in 19th-Century Irish English Threatening Notices”. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics3: 241–262. 10.1515/jhsl‑2017‑1007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2017-1007 [Google Scholar]
  48. Walton, Douglas
    2000Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑2940‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2940-6 [Google Scholar]
  49. Whelehan, Niall
    2012 “Labour and Agrarian Violence in the Irish Midlands, 1850–1870”. Saothar37: 7–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wolf, Hans-Georg and Frank Polzenhagen
    2009World Englishes: A Cognitive Sociolinguistic Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199222
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199222 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00059.pet
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00059.pet
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error