Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



While different automated procedures for vowel formant prediction have recently been proposed, it is unclear how reliably these methods perform in the phonetic study of vowels in New Englishes and how such approaches could be applied to specific varieties. This paper compares different automatic methods for vowel formant prediction in New Englishes, using manual measurements of Trinidadian English as a baseline. The results show that all methods perform significantly better than default formant parameters often used in speech analysis packages, and that a Bayesian formant tracker calibrated with American (US-FAVE) and Trinidadian English (TRINI-FAVE) generally provides better results than an automatic procedure that optimizes formant ceilings on a vowel- and speaker-specific level. TRINI-FAVE measures vowels characteristic of Trinidadian English most accurately. Phonetic studies of vowels in New Englishes can benefit from these methods.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adank, Patti
    2003Vowel Normalization. A Perceptual-Acoustic Study of Dutch Vowels. Wageningen: Ponsen and Looijen.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atal, B. S. , and S. L. Hanauer
    1971 “Speech Analysis and Synthesis by Linear Prediction of the Speech Wave”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America50: 637–655. 10.1121/1.1912679
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912679 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boersma, Paul , and David Weenink
    2019 “Praat”, www.praat.org.
  4. Clopper, Cynthia G. , David B. Pisoni , and Kenneth de Jong
    2005 “Acoustic Characteristics of the Vowel Systems of Six Regional Varieties of American English”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America118: 1661–1676. 10.1121/1.2000774
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2000774 [Google Scholar]
  5. Deng, Li , Xiaodong Cui , Robert Pruvenok , Jonathan Huang , Safivy Momen , Yanyi Chen , and Abeer Alwan
    2006 “A Database of Vocal Tract Resonance Trajectories for Research in Speech Processing”. Proceedings of ICASSP 31. Toulouse: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 369–372.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deuber, Dagmar
    2014English in the Caribbean. Variation, Style and Standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139226400
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139226400 [Google Scholar]
  7. Escudero, Paola , Paul Boersma , Andréia Schurt Rauber , and Ricardo A. H. Bion
    2009 “A Cross-Dialect Acoustic Description of Vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America126: 1379–1393. 10.1121/1.3180321
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3180321 [Google Scholar]
  8. Evanini, Keelan
    2009 “The Permeability of Dialect Boundaries. A Case Study of the Region Surrounding Erie, Pennsylvania”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Evanini, Keelan , Stephen Isard , and Mark Liberman
    2009 “Automatic Formant Extraction for Sociolinguistic Analysis of Large Corpora”. Proceedings of Interspeech 10. Brighton: International Speech Communication Association, 1639–1642.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ewald, Otto , Eva Liina Asu , and Susanne Schötz
    2017 “The Formant Dynamics of Long Close Vowels in Three Varieties of Swedish”. Proceedings of Interspeech 18. Stockholm: International Speech Communication Association, 1412–1416. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1134
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1134 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fruehwald, Josef
    2013 “The Phonological Influence on Phonetic Change”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Glasberg, Brian R. , and Brian C. J. Moore
    1990 “Derivation of Auditory Filter Shapes from NotchedNoise Data”. Hearing Research17: 103–138. 10.1016/0378‑5955(90)90170‑T
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(90)90170-T [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrison, Philip T.
    2013 “Making Accurate Measurements. An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of the Measurement Tool, Analysis Settings and Speaker on Formant Measurements”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heeringa, Wilbert , and Hans van de Velde
    2017 “Visible Vowels. A Tool for the Visualization of Vowel Variation”. Proceedings of Interspeech 18. Stockholm: International Speech Communication Association, 4034–4035.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hillenbrand, James , Laura A. Getty , Michael J. Clark , and Kimberlee Wheeler
    1995 “Acoustic Characteristics of American English Vowels”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America97: 3099–111. 10.1121/1.411872
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hoffmann, Thomas
    2011 “The Black Kenyan English Vowel System. An Acoustic Phonetic Analysis”. English World-Wide32: 147–173. 10.1075/eww.32.2.02hof
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.32.2.02hof [Google Scholar]
  17. Huber, Jessica E. , Elaine T. Stathopoulos , Gina M. Curione , Theresa A. Ash , and Kenneth Johnson
    1999 “Formants of Children, Women, and Men: The Effects of Vocal Intensity Variation”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America106: 1532–1542. 10.1121/1.427150
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427150 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kendall, Tyler , and Charlotte Vaughn
    2020 “Exploring Vowel Formant Estimation through Simulation-Based Techniques”. Linguistics Vanguard6: 1–13. 10.1515/lingvan‑2018‑0060
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2018-0060 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kretzschmar, William A.
    2008 “Standard American English Pronunciation”. In Bernd Kortmann , and Edgar W. Schneider . eds.The Americas and the Caribbean. Berlin: De Gruyter, 37–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Labov, William , Sharon Ash , and Charles Boberg
    2006The Atlas of North American English. Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Labov, William , Ingrid Rosenfelder , and Josef Fruehwald
    2013 “One Hundred Years of Sound Change in Philadelphia. Linear Incrementation, Reversal, and Reanalysis”. Language89: 30–65. 10.1353/lan.2013.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0015 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lee, Sungbok , Alexandros Potamianos , and Shrikanth Narayanan
    1999 “Acoustics of Children’s Speech. Developmental Changes of Temporal and Spectral Parameters”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America105: 1455–1468. 10.1121/1.426686
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.426686 [Google Scholar]
  23. Leung, Glenda A.
    2013 “A Synchronic Sociophonetic Study of Monophthongs in Trinidadian English”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Freiburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lobanov, Boris. M.
    1971 “Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America49: 606–608. 10.1121/1.1912396
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912396 [Google Scholar]
  25. Maxwell, Olga , and Janet Fletcher
    2009 “Acoustic and Durational Properties of Indian English Vowels”. World Englishes28: 52–69. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2008.01569.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.01569.x [Google Scholar]
  26. McAuliffe, Michael , Michaela Socolof , Sarah Mihuc , Michael Wagner , and Morgan Sonderegger
    2017 “Montreal Forced Aligner. Trainable Text-Speech Alignment Using Kaldi”. Proceedings of Interspeech 18. Stockholm: International Speech Communication Association, 498–502. 10.21437/Interspeech.2017‑1386
    https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1386 [Google Scholar]
  27. Meer, Philipp
    2019 “Sociolinguistic Variation in (Standard) Trinidadian English Vowels. A Semi-Automatic Sociophonetic Study of Selected Monophthongs and Diphthongs”. Paper presented atCongress of the Brazilian Linguistics Association, Maceió.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2020 “Automatic Alignment for New Englishes. Applying State-of-the-Art Aligners to Trinidadian English”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America147: 2283–2294. 10.1121/10.0001069
    https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001069 [Google Scholar]
  29. Meer, Philipp , and José A. Matute Flores
    2018 “Making FAVE Ready for New Englishes. Applying and Modifying FAVE for Semi-Automatic Acoustic Analyses of Trinidadian English Vowels”. Paper presented atNWAV 47, New York University.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mielke, Jeff , Erik R. Thomas , Josef Fruehwald , Michael McAuliffe , Morgan Sonderegger , Jane Stuart-Smith , and Robin Dodsworth
    2019 “Age Vectors vs. Axes of Intraspeaker Variation in Vowel Formants Measured Automatically from Several English Speech Corpora”. Proceedings of ICPhS 19. Canberra: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, 1258–1262.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Moore, Brian C. J.
    2010 “Aspects of Auditory Processing Related to Speech Perception”. In Fiona E. Gibbon , John Laver , and William J. Hardcastle . eds.The Handbook of Phonetic sciences. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 454–488. 10.1002/9781444317251.ch13
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317251.ch13 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pilgrim, Imelda , Ken Haworth , Anthony Perry , Maria Darlington , Joyce Stewart , and Arlene Dwarika
    2017English A for CSEC (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rosenfelder, Ingrid , Josef Fruehwald , Keelan Evanini , Scott Seyfarth , Kyle Gorman , Hilary Prichard , and Jiahong Yuan
    2014 “FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction)”, https://github.com/JoFrhwld/FAVE.
  34. Severance, Nathan , Keelan Evanini , and Aaron Dinkin
    2016 “Examining the Reliability of Automated Vowel Analyses Using FAVE”. Paper presented atSecond North-West Phonetics and Phonology Conference, University of Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tan, Rachel Siew Kuang , and Ee-Ling Low
    2010 “How Different are the Monophthongs of Malay Speakers of Malaysian and Singapore English?” English World-Wide31: 162–189. 10.1075/eww.31.2.03tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.31.2.03tan [Google Scholar]
  36. Thomas, Erik R.
    2011Sociophonetics. An Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Toefy, Tracey Lynn
    2014 “Sociophonetics and Class Differentiation. A Study of Working- and Middle-Class English in Cape Town’s Coloured Community”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Cape Town.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Vallabha, Gautam K. , and Betty Tuller
    2002 “Systematic Errors in the Formant Analysis of Steady-State Vowels”. Speech Communication38: 141–160. 10.1016/S0167‑6393(01)00049‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00049-8 [Google Scholar]
  39. Watson, Catherine I. and Zoe E. Evans
    2016 “Sound change or experimental artifact? A study on the impact of data preparation on measuring sound change”. Proceedings of the 16th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Parramatta: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association, 261–264.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wells, John C.
    1982Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611759
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611759 [Google Scholar]
  41. Youssef, Valerie , and Winford James
    2008 “The Creoles of Trinidad and Tobago”. In Bernd Kortmann and Edgar W. Schneider . eds.The Americas and the Caribbean. Berlin: De Gruyter, 320–338.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error