1887
Volume 45, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates the so-called South African English progressive (for example, ). Linguistic literature on South African English (SAfE) often states that this construction is a typical feature of this variety of English. The use and the frequency of this construction is mostly attributed to the influence of the Afrikaans [BUSY X V] construction, as in (‘I am working’). The aim of this paper is twofold: Firstly, it critically evaluates some of the claims that have been made about the so-called “SAfE busy progressive” and, secondly, it uses a corpus- and usage-based approach that employs a greater assortment of available corpus data from SAfE and other English varieties, as well as available information on the Afrikaans and Dutch progressives, to explore the possibility of new insights into the use of in English aspectual constructions.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00090.bre
2024-05-01
2025-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Corpus Hedendaags Nederlands – CHN (Version 3.0)
    Corpus Hedendaags Nederlands – CHN (Version 3.0)hdl.handle.net/10032/tm-a2-s8〉.
  2. Davies, Mark
    2019–The Coronavirus Corpushttps://www.english-corpora.org/corona/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2008–The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA)https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2010The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA)https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2013Corpus of Global Web-Based Englishhttps://www.english-corpora.org/glowbe/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2015The Wikipedia Corpushttps://www.english-corpora.org/wiki/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2016–Corpus of Online Registers of English (CORE)https://www.english-corpora.org/core/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2017Early English Books Online Corpushttps://www.english-corpora.org/eebo/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Virtuele Instituut vir Afrikaans (VivA)
    Virtuele Instituut vir Afrikaans (VivA) 2022Korpusportaal: Omvattend 1.11. [Corpus portal: comprehensive 1.11.] 〈viva-afrikaans.org〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bach, Emmon
    1986 “The Algebra Of Events”. Linguistics and Philosophy91: 5–16. 10.1007/BF00627432
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627432 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bekker, Ian
    2012 “The Story of South African English: A Brief Linguistic Overview”. International Journal of Language, Translation and Intercultural Communication11: 139–150. 10.12681/ijltic.16
    https://doi.org/10.12681/ijltic.16 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bowerman, Sean
    2004 “White South African English: Morphology and Syntax”. InRajend Mesthrie, ed.Varieties of English: Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Berlin: De Gruyter, 472–484.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Branford, Jean
    1980A Dictionary of South African English. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1991A Dictionary of South African English. (4th ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Breed, Adri, and Gerhard B. van Huyssteen
    2014 “Aan die en besig in Afrikaanse progressiwiteitskonstruksies [Aan die and besig in Afrikaans Progressive Constructions]”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe541: 708–725.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2015 “Aan die en besig in Afrikaanse progressiwiteitskonstruksies: ’n korpusondersoek [Aan die and besig in Afrikaans Progressive Constructions: A Corpus Investigation]”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe551: 251–269. 10.17159/2224‑7912/2015/V55N2A7
    https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2015/V55N2A7 [Google Scholar]
  17. Breed, Adri, Frank Brisard, and Ben Verhoeven
    2017 “Periphrastic Progressive Constructions in Dutch and Afrikaans: A Contrastive Analysis”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics291: 305–378. 10.1017/S1470542717000022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542717000022 [Google Scholar]
  18. Breed, Adri
    2012 “Die grammatikalisering van aspek in Afrikaans: ’n Semantiese studie van perifrastiese progressiewe konstruksies [The Grammaticalization of Aspect in Afrikaans: A Semantic Study of Periphrastic Progressive Constructions]”. Ph.D. Dissertation, North-West University.
  19. 2016 “Aspek in Afrikaans: ’n teoretiese beskrywing [Aspect in Afrikaans: A Theoretical Description]”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe561: 62–80. 10.17159/2224‑7912/2016/v56n1a5
    https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2016/v56n1a5 [Google Scholar]
  20. Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca
    1994The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. De Wit, Astrid, and Frank Brisard
    2014 “A Cognitive Grammar Account of the Semantics of the English Present Progressive”. Journal of Linguistics501: 49–90. 10.1017/S0022226713000169
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226713000169 [Google Scholar]
  23. De Wit, Astrid, Adeline Patard, and Frank Brisard
    2013 “A Contrastive Analysis of the Present Progressive in French and English”. Studies in Language371: 846–879. 10.1075/sl.37.4.05wit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.4.05wit [Google Scholar]
  24. De Wit, Astrid, Peter Petré, and Frank Brisard
    2020 “Standing out with the progressive”. Journal of Linguistics561: 479–514. 10.1017/S0022226719000501
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226719000501 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dixon, R. M. W., and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2000Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750 [Google Scholar]
  26. Geleyn, Tim, and Timothy Colleman
    2014 “De progressieve constructies bezig zijn en besig wees: Een contrastief corpusonderzoek Nederlands-Afrikaans [The Progressive Constructions bezig zijn and bezig wees: A Contrastive Corpus Investigation Dutch-Afrikaans]”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe541: 56–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
    2010Corpus, Cognition and Causative Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.39
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.39 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gries, Stefan Th
    2022Coll. Analysis 4.0. A Script for R to Compute Perform Collostructional Analyses. Version 4.0https://www.stgries.info/teaching/groningen/index.html〉. (accessedJune 22, 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch
    2004a “Extending Collostructional Analysis: A Corpus-Based Perspective on ‘Alternations’”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics91: 97–129. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
  30. Gries, Stefan. Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch
    2004b “Covarying Collexemes in the Into-Causative”. InMichel Achard, and Suzanne Kemmer, eds.Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 225–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gut, Ulrike, and Robert Fuchs
    2013 “Progressive Aspect in Nigerian English”. Journal of English Linguistics411: 243–267. 10.1177/0075424213492799
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213492799 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hardie, Andrew
    2023Significance Test Systemcorpora.lancs.ac.uk/sigtest/〉 (accessedJune 22, 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ljung, Magnus
    1980Reflections on the English Progressive. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothenborgensis.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kachru, Braj B.
    1985 “Standards, Codification, and Sociolinguistic Realism: The English Language in the Outer Circle”. InRandolph Quirk, and Henry Widdowson, eds.English in the World: Teaching and Learning of Language and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lass, Roger, and Susan Wright
    1986 “Endogeny vs. Contact: ‘Afrikaans Influence’ on South African English”. English World-Wide71: 201–223. 10.1075/eww.7.2.03las
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.7.2.03las [Google Scholar]
  36. Lass, Roger
    1995 “South African English”. InRajend Mesthrie, ed.Language and Social History: Studies in South African Sociolinguistics. Cape Town: David Philip Publishers, 89–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lyons, John
    1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mesthrie, Rajend
    1999 “Syntactic Change in Progress: Semi-Auxiliary Busy in South African English”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics61: 63–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2002 “Endogeny versus Contact Revisited: Aspectual Busy in South African English”. Language Sciences241: 345–358. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(01)00037‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00037-7 [Google Scholar]
  40. Middle English Compendium
    Middle English Compendium. 〈https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/middle-english-dictionary/〉 (accessedFebruary 1, 2023).
  41. Oxford English Dictionary (OED)
    Oxford English Dictionary (OED). Oxford: Oxford University Press 〈https://www.oed.com〉 (accessedFebruary 1, 2023).
  42. Piotrowska, Caroline
    2014 “A Diachronic Analysis of the Progressive Aspect in Black South African English”. M.A. Thesis, North-West University.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Siemund, Peter
    2019 “Regional Varieties of English: Non-Standard Grammatical Features”. InBas Aarts, Jill Bowie, and Gergana Popova, eds.Oxford Handbook of English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 604–629. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.29
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198755104.013.29 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
    2003 “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics81: 209–243. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  46. Tatevosov, Sergej
    2002 “The Parameter of Actionality”. Linguistic Typology61: 317–401.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Rooy, Bertus
    2006 “The Extension of the Progressive Aspect in Black South African English”. World Englishes251: 37–64. 10.1111/j.0083‑2919.2006.00446.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0083-2919.2006.00446.x [Google Scholar]
  48. 2014 “Progressive Aspect and Stative Verbs in Outer Circle Varieties”. World Englishes331: 157–172. 10.1111/weng.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12079 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2020 “Grammatical Change in South African Englishes”. World Englishes401: 24–37. 10.1111/weng.12470
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12470 [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Rooy, Bertus, and Haidee Kruger
    2016 “The Innovative Progressive Aspect of Black South African English”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research21: 205–228. 10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.04van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.04van [Google Scholar]
  51. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 “Verbs and Times”. The Philosophical Review661: 143–160. 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  52. Williams, Christopher
    2002Non-Progressive and Progressive Aspect in English. Fasano: Schena Editore.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00090.bre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00090.bre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Afrikaans; aspect; busy; Dutch; imperfective; progressive; South African English
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error