1887
Volume 45, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines linguistic prejudice towards the accents of three regional varieties of Philippine English: Cebuano English, Ilocano English, and Tagalog English. Data were collected using a verbal-guise technique taken by 982 listener-judges, who were selected using a purposive sampling technique. Results showed an overall more favorable attitude towards Tagalog English. Cebuano English and Ilocano English speakers were judged as less socially attractive and less competent compared to their Tagalog English counterparts. In the multilingual Philippines, where languages in the periphery, i.e. languages other than English and Tagalog, face negative stereotypes, the results indicate potential linguistic prejudice towards accents that individuals view as deviating from the standard, i.e. the Tagalog English accent as ‘the’ standard of Philippine English. The findings are discussed in light of the ongoing observation of the development of Philippine English in the Schneiderian model of postcolonial Englishes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00091.qui
2024-04-18
2024-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anisfield, Moshe, Norman Bogo, and Wallace E. Lambert
    1962 “Evaluational Reactions to Accented English Speech”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology651: 223–231. 10.1037/h0045060
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045060 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baranova, Vlada, and Kapitolina Federova
    2022 “Accents of Russian in Performative Use: Ethnic Styles, Language Attitudes, and Identities of Young Non-native Speakers”. Philologia Estonica Tallinnensis71: 104–124. 10.22601/PET.2022.07.04
    https://doi.org/10.22601/PET.2022.07.04 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baratta, Alex
    2017 “Accent and Linguistic Prejudice within British Teacher Training”. Journal of Language, Identity & Education161: 416–423. 10.1080/15348458.2017.1359608
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2017.1359608 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bautista, Maria Lourdes S.
    2001a “Attitudes of English Language Faculty in Three Leading Philippine Universities Toward Philippine English”. Asian Englishes41: 4–32. 10.1080/13488678.2001.10801062
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2001.10801062 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2001b “Attitudes of Selected Luzon University Students and Faculty towards Philippine English”. InRosario E. Maminta, ed.Focus: Selected Writings in Applied Linguistics. Quezon City: Philippine Association for Language Teaching, 235–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga
    2009 “A Survey on Language Use, Attitudes, and Identity in Relation to Philippine English among Young Generation Filipinos: An Initial Sample from a Private University”. Philippine ESL Journal31: 74–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2016 “Relocating Philippine English in Schneider’s Dynamic Model”. Asian Englishes181: 1–10. 10.1080/13488678.2016.1223067
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2016.1223067 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2023a “History”. InAriane Macalinga Borlongan, ed.Philippine English: Development, Structure, and Sociology of English in the Philippines. London: Routledge, 9–26. 10.4324/9780429427824
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429427824 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2023b “Standard Philippine English”. InAriane Macalinga Borlongan, ed.Philippine English: Development, Structure, and Sociology of English in the Philippines. London: Routledge, 199–209. 10.4324/9780429427824
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429427824 [Google Scholar]
  10. Canilao, Maria Luz Elena N.
    2020 “Foregrounding Philippine Englishes in Fostering Linguistic Equality”. Asian Englishes221: 195–215. 10.1080/13488678.2020.1715575
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2020.1715575 [Google Scholar]
  11. Carrie, Erin
    2017 “‘British is Professional, American is Urban’: Attitudes towards English Reference Accents in Spain”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics271: 427–446. 10.1111/ijal.12139
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12139 [Google Scholar]
  12. Collins, Peter, and Ariane Macalinga Borlongan
    2017 “Has Philippine English Attained Linguistic Independence? The Grammatical Evidence”. Philippine ESL Journal191: 10–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dayag, Danilo
    2012 “Philippine English”. InEe-Ling Low, and Azirah Hashim, eds.English in Southeast Asia: Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 91–100. 10.1075/veaw.g42.09day
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g42.09day [Google Scholar]
  14. de Bres, Julia, and Sally Akevai Nicholas
    2021 “The Sexiest Accent in the World: Linguistic Insecurity and Prejudice in Media Coverage of the New Zealand Accent”. Te Reo – The Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand641: 15–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. De Leon, Kristine
    2016 “The Intelligibility of Philippine English to Selected ASEAN Countries”. Ph.D. Dissertation, De La Salle University.
  16. Dragojevic, Marko, and Sean Goatley-Soan
    2020 “Americans’ Attitudes toward Foreign Accents: Evaluative Hierarchies and Underlying Processes”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development431: 167–181. 10.1080/01434632.2020.1735402
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1735402 [Google Scholar]
  17. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Chuck D. Fennig
    eds. 2021Ethnologue: Languages of the World (24th ed.). Dallas, TX: SIL International.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Freynet, Nathalie, Katherine Anne Collins, and Richard Clément
    2020 “Consequences of Perceived Accent Discrimination for Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Effects”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development411: 858–871. 10.1080/01434632.2019.1660355
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1660355 [Google Scholar]
  19. Giles, Howard, Richard Y. Bourhis, and Donald M. Taylor
    1974 “Towards a Theory of Language in Ethnic Group Relations”. InHoward Giles, ed.Language, Ethnicity, and Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press, 307–348.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gonzales, Wilkinson Daniel Wong
    2017 “Philippine Englishes”. Asian Englishes191: 79–95. 10.1080/13488678.2016.1274574
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2016.1274574 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hernandez, Hjalmar P.
    2020 “Filipino Graduate Students’ Attitudes toward Teaching Educated Philippine English: A Sample from a Premier Teacher Education Institution”. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review201: 31–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Jindapitak, Naratip, and Adisa Teo
    2012 “Thai Tertiary English Majors’ Attitudes towards and Awareness of World Englishes”. Journal of Studies in the English Language71: 74–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kachru, Braj B.
    2005Asian Englishes beyond the Canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lambert, Wallace E., Robert C. Gardner, Robert M. Olton, and K. Tunstall
    1968 “A Study of the Roles of Attitudes and Motivation in Second-language Learning”. InJoshua A. Fishman, ed.Readings in the Sociology of Language. Berlin: De Gruyter, 473–491. 10.1515/9783110805376.473
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805376.473 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lambert, Wallace E., Richard C. Hodgson, Robert C. Gardner, and Samuel Fillenbaum
    1960 “Evaluational Reactions to Spoken Languages”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology601: 44–51. 10.1037/h0044430
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lesho, Marivic
    2018 “Philippine English (Metro Manila Acrolect)”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association481: 357–370. 10.1017/S0025100317000548
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100317000548 [Google Scholar]
  27. Martin, Isabel Pefianco
    2014a “Beyond Nativization? Philippine English in Schneider’s Dynamic Model”. InSarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffman, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds.The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 70–85. 10.1075/veaw.g49.05mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.05mar [Google Scholar]
  28. 2014b “Philippine English revisited”. World Englishes331: 50–59. 10.1111/weng.12054
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12054 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2014c “English Language Teaching in the Philippines”. World Englishes331: 472–485. 10.1111/weng.12108
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12108 [Google Scholar]
  30. McGlone, Matthew S., and Barbara Breckinridge
    2010 “Why the Brain Doubts a Foreign Accent”. Scientific AmericanSeptember 21, 2010 〈https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-brain-doubts-accent/〉 (accessedDecember 10, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. McKenzie, Robert M., and Andrew McNeill
    eds. 2023Implicit and Explicit Language Attitudes: Mapping Linguistic Prejudice and Attitude Change in England. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy
    2012Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English (1st ed.). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203124666
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203124666 [Google Scholar]
  33. O’Neill, Paul, and Gladis Massini-Cagliari
    2019 “Linguistic prejudice and discrimination in Brazilian Portuguese and beyond : suggestions and recommendations”. Journal of Language and Discrimination31: 32–62. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/170049/
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Preston, Dennis R.
    1989Perceptual Dialectology: Nonlinguists’ Views of Areal Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110871913
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110871913 [Google Scholar]
  35. ed. 1999Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology (Volume11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.hpd1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.hpd1 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2002 “Language with an Attitude”. InJ. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, eds.The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 39–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Quinto, Edward Jay M.
    2015 “Issues and Trends in Applied Linguistics in the Philippines: A Decade in Retrospect”. Asian Englishes171: 80–84. 10.1080/13488678.2015.998362
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2015.998362 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2018 “Towards a Possible Selves-Based Model of Language Teacher Identity among New Teachers: An Exploratory Sequential Analysis”. Ph.D. Dissertation, De La Salle University.
  39. Quinto, Edward Jay M., and Sterling M. Plata
    2023 “Teacher Education”. InAriane Macalinga Borlongan, ed.Philippine English: Development, Structure, and Sociology of English in the Philippines. London: Routledge, 305–314. 10.4324/9780429427824
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429427824 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rentillo, Philip
    2023 “Attitudes”. InAriane Macalinga Borlongan, ed.Philippine English: Development, Structure, and Sociology of English in the Philippines. London: Routledge, 231–241. 10.4324/9780429427824
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429427824 [Google Scholar]
  41. Roessel, Janin, Christiane Schoel, and Dagmar Stahlberg
    2020 “Modern Notions of Accent-ism: Findings, Conceptualizations, and Implications for Interventions and Research on Nonnative Accents”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology391: 87–111. 10.1177/0261927X19884619
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19884619 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, and Cynthia M. Bulik
    1982 “Evaluations of Middle Class and Lower Class Speakers of Standard American and German-accented English”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology11: 51–61. 10.1177/0261927X8200100104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X8200100104 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, and Miguel A. Carranza
    1975 “Evaluative Reactions of Adolescents toward Speakers of Standard English and Mexican American Accented English”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology311: 855–863. 10.1037/h0076704
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076704 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, Miguel A. Carranza, and Rovert W. Moffie
    1977 “Reactions toward varying Degrees of Accentedness in the Speech of Spanish-English Bilinguals”. Language and Speech201: 267–273. 10.1177/002383097702000308
    https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000308 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, and Richard J. Sebastian
    1980 “The Effects of Speech Style and Social Class Background on Social Judgements of Speakers”. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology191: 229–233. 10.1111/j.2044‑8260.1980.tb00348.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1980.tb00348.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Schneider, Edgar W.
    2003 “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language791: 233–281. 10.1353/lan.2003.0136
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0136 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2007Postcolonial English: Varieties of English around the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schüppert, Anja, Nanna Haug Hilton, and Charlotte Gooskens
    2015 “Swedish is Beautiful, Danish is Ugly? Investigating the Link between Language Attitudes and Spoken Word Recognition”. Linguistics531: 375–403. 10.1515/ling‑2015‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0003 [Google Scholar]
  49. Soria, J.
    2012 “Paka(sarita)an: On Ilokano language, identity, and heritage education”. Ph.D.Dissertation. University of Hawai’i at Mānoa.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tayao, Ma. Lourdes G.
    2004 “The Evolving Study of Philippine English Phonology”. World Englishes231: 77–90. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2004.00336.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2004.00336.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Tirosh, Ofer
    2021 “The Philippines’ Language Report. What Language is Spoken in the Philippines?”. LinkedInOctober 13, 2021. 〈https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/philippines-language-report-what-spoken-ofer-tirosh/〉 (accessedDecember 21, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Tucker, G. Richard, and Wallace E. Lambert
    1969 “White and Negro listeners’ Reactions to Various American-English Dialects”. Social Forces471: 463–8. 10.2307/2574535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2574535 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tupas, T. Ruanni F.
    2004 “The Politics of Philippine English: Neocolonialism, Global Politics, and the Problem of Postcolonialism”. World Englishes231: 47–58. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2004.00334.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2004.00334.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Tupas, T. Ruanni F., and Aileen Salonga
    2016 “Unequal Englishes in the Philippines”. Journal of Sociolinguistics201: 367–381. 10.1111/josl.12185
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12185 [Google Scholar]
  55. Velasco, Yvonne Pedria
    2019 “The Kachruvian Connection and English Language Teaching in the Philippines”. World Englishes381: 294–302. 10.1111/weng.12374
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12374 [Google Scholar]
  56. Zuidema, Leah A.
    2011 “Myth Education: Rationale and Strategies for Teaching Against Linguistic Prejudice”. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy481: 666–675. 10.1598/JAAL.48.8.4
    https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.48.8.4 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00091.qui
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.00091.qui
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error