1887
Volume 43, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this study, we examine variation in English strong verb preterite/participle morphology in four frequent verbs: /, /, / and /, using data from more than a dozen Ontario communities, socially stratified by age, sex, occupation and education, representing a continuum of urban/rural locations and spanning more than 100 years in apparent-time. Comparative sociolinguistic methods and statistical modelling permit testing of social, geographic and linguistic factors on the variation. Despite strong social constraints, linguistic constraints are also significant. We argue that standardization and increasing literacy have nearly eradicated the vernacular preterite forms, but they are not moribund yet. Moreover, at least one form is stable, preterite . The non-standard variants endure as sociolinguistic markers, perhaps due to locally situated prestige, particularly in non-urban communities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.20014.jan
2022-09-20
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2003–2006 Linguistic Changes in Canada Entering the 21st Century. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410-2003-0005. individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2007–2010 “Directions of Change in Canadian English”. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410 070 048.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2010–2013 “Transmission and Diffusion in Canadian English”. Standard Research Grant #410-101-129. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2013–2018 “Social Determinants of Linguistic Systems”. Insight Grant: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2019–2024 “Language Change and Social Change in the Early 21st Century: Canadian English 2002 to 2020”. Insight Grant: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderwald, Lieselotte
    2009The Morphology of English Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511576539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576539 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013 “Natural Language Change or Prescriptive Influence? Throve, Dove, Pled, Drug and Snuck in 19th-Century American English”. English World-Wide34: 146–176. 10.1075/eww.34.2.02and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.34.2.02and [Google Scholar]
  8. Atwood, E. Bagby
    1953A Survey of Verb Forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.9690449
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9690449 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steven Walker
    2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4”. Journal of Statistical Software67: 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  10. Belleville Oral History Archive
    Belleville Oral History Archive 1975 “Opportunities for Youth 1975”. Hastings County Historical Society. City of Belleville, Ontario. Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, Douglas, Edward Finegan, and Dwight Atkinson
    1994 “Archer and Its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring a Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers”. InUdo Fries, Peter Schneider, and Gunnel Tottie, eds.Creating and Using English Language Corpora. Papers from the 14th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Zurich 1993. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Baayen, Harald R.
    2008Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  13. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bybee, Joan
    2002 “Word Frequency and Context of Use in the Lexical Diffusion of Phonetically Conditioned Sound Change”. Language Variation and Change14: 261–290. 10.1017/S0954394502143018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394502143018 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chambers, J. K.
    2000 “Universal Sources of the Vernacular”. InUlrich Ammon, Peter H. Nelde, and Klaus J. Mattheier, eds.Special Issue of Sociolinguistica: International Yearbook of European Sociolinguistics. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 11–15. 10.1515/9783110245196.11
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245196.11 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2001 “Vernacular Universals”. InJosep M. Fontana, Louise McNally, Teresa M. Turell, and Enric Vallduvi, eds.Proceedings of Iclave 1, the First International Conference on Language Variation in Europe. Barcelona: Universitate Pompeu Fabra, 52–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2004 “Dynamic Typology and Vernacular Universals”. InBernd Kortmann, ed.Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 127–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2009Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cheshire, Jenny
    1982Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1994 “Standardization and the English Irregular Verb”. InDieter Stein, and Ingrid Tieken-Boon von Ostade, eds.Towards a Standard English 1600–1800. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 115–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheshire, Jenny, Viv Edwards, and Pamela Whittle
    1993 “Non-Standard English and Dialect Levelling”. InJames Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, eds.Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. New York: Longman, 53–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cheshire, Jenny, and James Milroy
    1993 “Syntactic Variation in Non-Standard Dialects: Background Issues”. InJames Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, eds.Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. New York: Longman, 3–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Christian, Donna, Walt Wolfram, and Nanjo Dube
    1988Variation and Change in Geographically Isolated Communities: Appalachian English and Ozark English. Tuscaloosa: American Dialect Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Franco, Karlien, and Sali A. Tagliamonte
    2021 “Interesting Fellow or Tough Old Bird? 3rd Person Male Referents in Ontario”. American Speech96: 192–216. 10.1215/00031283‑8661833
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-8661833 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gadanidis, Timothy, Jean-François Juneau, Kinza Mahoon, Andrei Munteanu, Lisa Schlegl, Fiona Wilson, and Sali A. Tagliamonte
    2019 “Sounding Like a Sounder: Dialect Accommodation in Ontario, Canada”. Paper presented atAmerican Dialect Society Annual Meeting. New York, USA. January 3–6, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik, Achim Zeileis
    2006 “Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework”. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics15: 651–674. 10.1198/106186006X133933
    https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jankowski, Bridget L., and Sali A. Tagliamonte
    2017 “A Lost Canadian Dialect: The Ottawa Valley 1975–2013”. InTanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin, and Anita Auer, eds.Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 239–274. 10.1075/ahs.7.10jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.7.10jan [Google Scholar]
  28. Jankowski, Bridget L. and Sali A. Tagliamonte
    2021 “Urban-Rural Dimensions to Variable -Body/-One: The Case of Ontario, Canada.” InZiegler, Arne, Stefanie Edler, Nina Kleczkowski and Georg Oberdorfer (eds.), Urban Matters. Current Approaches of International Sociolinguistic Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.141-158. 10.1075/silv.27.06jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.27.06jan [Google Scholar]
  29. Jespersen, Otto H.
    1954A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. PartVI: Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kortmann, Bernd, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar Schneider, and Clive Upton
    2004A Handbook of Varieties of English: A Multimedia Reference Tool. Vol.2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197181
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197181 [Google Scholar]
  31. Krygier, Marcin
    1994The Disintegration of the English Strong Verb System. Frankfurt: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Labov, William
    1970 “The Study of Language in Its Social Context”. Studium Generale23: 30–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1972 “The Transformation of Experience in Narrative Syntax”. InWilliam Labov, ed.Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 354–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2001Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol.2: Social Factors. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2007 “Transmission and Diffusion”. Language83: 344–387. 10.1353/lan.2007.0082
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0082 [Google Scholar]
  36. Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
    1967 “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience”. InJune Helm, ed.Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Long, Mary McDonald
    1944The English Strong Verb from Chaucer to Caxton. Menasha: George Banta Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Needle, Jeremy M. and Sali A. Tagliamonte
    2022 “Orderly Obsolescence: The Decline of /hw/ in Ontario”. American Speech. 10.1215/00031283‑10104915
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-10104915 [Google Scholar]
  39. Padolsky, Enoch, and Ian Pringle
    1981A Historical Source Book for the Ottawa Valley. Ottawa: Linguistic Survey of the Ottawa Valley, Carleton University.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Poplack, Shana, and Sali A. Tagliamonte
    2001African American English in the Diaspora: Tense and Aspect. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pringle, Ian, and Enoch Padolsky
    1983 “The Linguistic Survey of the Ottawa Valley”. American Specch58: 325–344. 10.2307/455147
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455147 [Google Scholar]
  42. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2021R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing www.R-project.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rissanen, Matti, and Minna Palander-Collin
    1993Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Smith, Jennifer
    2000 “Synchrony and Diachrony in the Evolution of English: Evidence from Scotland”. D.Phil. dissertation, University of York.
  45. 2004 “Accounting for Vernacular Features in a Scottish Dialect: Relic, Innovation, Analogy and Drift”. InChristian Kay, Simon Horobin, and Jeremy Smith, eds.New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 177–193. 10.1075/cilt.251.11smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.251.11smi [Google Scholar]
  46. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
    2013Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Taeldeman, Johan
    2005 “The Influence of Urban Centres on the Spatial Diffusion of Dialect Phenomena”. InPeter Auer, Frans Hinskens, and Paul Kerswill, eds.Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–283. 10.1017/CBO9780511486623.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486623.012 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2001 “Come/Came Variation in English Dialects”. American Speech76: 42–61. 10.1215/00031283‑76‑1‑42
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-76-1-42 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2006Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2012Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Harald R. Baayen
    2012 “Models, Forests and Trees of York English: Was/Were Variation as a Case Study for Statistical Practice”. Language Variation and Change24: 135–178. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tidholm, Hans
    1979The Dialect of Egton in North Yorkshire. Gothenburg: Bokmaskine.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Trudgill, Peter J.
    1972 “Sex, Covert Prestige, and Linguistic Change in Urban British English”. Language in Society1: 179–195. 10.1017/S0047404500000488
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000488 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wickham, Hadley
    2016ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wolfram, Walt, and Natalie Schilling-Estes
    1998American English. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.20014.jan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.20014.jan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error