1887
Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

As studies on socio-pragmatics in South Asian Englishes and – more generally – postcolonial Englishes are still rare, the present study analyses how age, formality of context, gender, topic of the conversation and type-token ratio of a given speaker influence intensifiers and downtoners in spoken Indian, Sri Lankan and British English as represented in the . Central research interests cover (a) differences in the frequencies of intensifiers/downtoners regarding these factors and across the varieties studied and (b) variety-specific intensifiers/downtoners in these regional varieties. Two random forest analyses highlight that, while topic and type-token ratio are more important predictors than age and gender, all variables are – to different degrees – sensitive to variety. Possible explanations for a higher incidence of intensifiers/downtoners in British English than in Indian and Sri Lankan English include intensification strategies transferred from indigenous languages or high degrees of uncertainty avoidance in the South Asian speech communities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.21064.fun
2021-11-17
2022-05-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. International Corpus of English – British Component
    International Corpus of English – British Component (https://www.ice-corpora.uzh.ch/en/access.html)
  2. International Corpus of English – Indian Component
    International Corpus of English – Indian Component (https://www.ice-corpora.uzh.ch/en/access.html
  3. International Corpus of English – Sri Lankan Component
    International Corpus of English – Sri Lankan Component (https://www.ice-corpora.uzh.ch/en/access.html)
  4. Aijmer, Karin
    2020 “‘That’s Well Good’: A Re-Emergent Intensifier in Current British English”. Journal of English Linguistics49: 18–38. 10.1177/0075424220979143
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424220979143 [Google Scholar]
  5. Austin, John L.
    1962How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bäcklund, Ulf
    1973The Collocation of Adverbs of Degree in English. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, Paul
    2006Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum. 10.5040/9781350933996
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barbieri, Federica
    2008 “Patterns of Age-Based Linguistic Variation in American English”. Journal of Sociolinguistics12: 58–88. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00353.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00353.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnfield, Katie, and Isabelle Buchstaller
    2010 “Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal Developments and New Trends”. English World-Wide31: 252–287. 10.1075/eww.31.3.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.31.3.02bar [Google Scholar]
  10. Baskerville, Rachel
    2003 “Hofstede Never Studied Culture”. Accounting, Organizations and Society28: 1–14. 10.1016/S0361‑3682(01)00048‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00048-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries, and Joybrato Mukherjee
    2014 “The Dative Alternation in South Asian Englishes: Modelling Predictors and Predicting Prototypes”. English World-Wide35: 7–31. 10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber [Google Scholar]
  12. Bernaisch, Tobias
    2021 “Features of Sri Lankan English”. InEe-Ling Low, and Anne Pakir, eds.English in East and South Asia: Policy, Features and Language in Use. London: Routledge, 168–182. 10.4324/9780429433467‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433467-14 [Google Scholar]
  13. . fc. “Intensifiers in Late Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study”.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2015The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g54 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2019 “That Fellow is Cute Men: Informal Terms of Address in Sri Lankan English”. Paper presented at theAnnual Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society, 10–13 Dec 2019, Sydney, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bohmann, Axel
    2019Variation in English World-Wide: Registers and Global Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108751339
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108751339 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bolinger, Dwight
    1972Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110877786
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786 [Google Scholar]
  18. Breiman, Leo
    2001 “Random Forests”. Machine Learning45: 5–32. 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena”. InEsther N. Goody, ed.Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–289.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Carls, Uwe, Peter Lucko, Lothar Peter, and Frank Polzhagen
    eds. 2017A Dictionary of Indian English: With a Supplement on Word-Formation Patterns. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chandralal, Dileep
    2010Sinhala. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/loall.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.15 [Google Scholar]
  22. de Klerk, Vivian
    2005 “Expressing Levels of Intensity in Xhosa English”. English World-Wide26: 77–95. 10.1075/eww.26.1.04dek
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.26.1.04dek [Google Scholar]
  23. Fuchs, Robert
    2015Speech Rhythm in Varieties of English: Evidence from Educated Indian English and British English. Singapore: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2017 “Do Women (Still) Use More Intensifiers than Men? Recent Change in the Sociolinguistics of Intensifiers in British English”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics22: 345–374. 10.1075/ijcl.22.3.03fuc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.03fuc [Google Scholar]
  25. Fuchs, Robert, and Ulrike Gut
    2016 “Register Variation in Intensifier Usage across Asian Englishes”. InHeike Pichler, ed.Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 185–210. 10.1017/CBO9781107295476.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295476.009 [Google Scholar]
  26. Funke, Nina
    2020 “Pragmatic Nativisation of Thanking in South Asian Englishes”. World Englishes. [early view] 10.1111/weng.12517
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12517 [Google Scholar]
  27. Greenbaum, Sidney
    1991 “The Development of the International Corpus of English”. InKarin Aijmer, and Bengt Altenberg, eds.English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 83–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gries, Stefan Th.
    2020 “On Classification Trees and Random Forests in Corpus Linguistics: Some Words of Caution and Suggestions for Improvement”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory16: 617–647. 10.1515/cllt‑2018‑0078
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0078 [Google Scholar]
  29. Grün, Bettina, and Kurt Hornik
    2011 “topicmodels: An R Package for Fitting Topic Models”. Journal of Statistical Software40: 1–30. 10.18637/jss.v040.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13 [Google Scholar]
  30. Güldenring, Barbara A.
    2017 “Emotion Metaphors in New Englishes: A Corpus-Based Study of ANGER”. Cognitive Linguistics Studies4: 82–109. 10.1075/cogls.4.1.05gul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.05gul [Google Scholar]
  31. Gunesekera, Manique
    2005The Postcolonial Identity of Sri Lankan English. Colombo: Katha Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hofstede, Geert
    1991Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2011 “Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context”. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, Unit 2. Retrieved from scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/8. 10.9707/2307‑0919.1014
    https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 [Google Scholar]
  34. Holmes, Janet
    1984 “Modifying Illocutionary Force”. Journal of Pragmatics8: 345–365. 10.1016/0378‑2166(84)90028‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(84)90028-6 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ito, Rika, and Sali Tagliamonte
    2003 “Well Weird, Right Dodgy, Very Strange, Really Cool: Layering and Recycling in English Intensifiers”. Language in Society32: 257–279. 10.1017/S0047404503322055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503322055 [Google Scholar]
  36. James, Gareth, Daniela Witten, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani
    2015An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kachru, Braj
    1986The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions, and Models of Non-Native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Koul, Omkar N.
    2008Modern Hindi Grammar. Springfield: Dunwoody Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kuhn, Max, and Kjell Johnson
    2016Applied Predictive Modeling. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lange, Claudia
    2012The Syntax of Spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g45 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lorenz, Gunter
    2002 “Really Worthwhile or not Really Significant? A Corpus-Based Approach to the Delexicalization and Grammaticalization of Intensifiers in Modern English”. InIlse Wischer, and Gabriele Diewald, eds.New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–161. 10.1075/tsl.49.11lor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.11lor [Google Scholar]
  42. Mendis, Dushyanthi
    2019 “Dude vs. Machang as Terms of Address in Sri Lankan English”. Plenary atTheory, Method and Practice in Corpus Linguistics, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Meyler, Michael
    2007A Dictionary of Sri Lankan English. Colombo: Mirisgala.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mukherjee, Joybrato
    2007 “Steady States in the Evolution of New Englishes: Present-Day Indian English as an Equilibrium”. Journal of English Linguistics35: 157–187. 10.1177/0075424207301888
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207301888 [Google Scholar]
  45. Murugaiyan, Appasamy
    2009 “Focus Constructions in Modern Tamil”. International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics38: 43–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Nevalainen, Terttu, and Matti Rissanen
    2002 “Fairly Pretty or Pretty Fair? On the Development and Grammaticalization of English Downtoners”. Language Sciences24: 359–380. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(01)00038‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(01)00038-9 [Google Scholar]
  47. Nihalani, Paroo, Ray K. Tongue, and Riya Hosali
    1979Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Paradis, Carita
    2000 “It’s Well Weird. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives Revisited: The Nineties”. InJohn M. Kirk, ed.Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 147–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Partington, Alan
    1993 “Corpus Evidence of Language Change: The Case of the Intensifier”. Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair: 177–192. 10.1075/z.64.12par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.12par [Google Scholar]
  50. Peters, Hans
    1994 “Degree Adverbs in Early Modern English”. Topics in English Linguistics13: 269–288. 10.1515/9783110879599.269
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879599.269 [Google Scholar]
  51. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Reuhl, Leon
    2020 “Frequencies and Functions of Reduplication in Sri Lankan English: A Corpus-Based Pilot Study”. BA thesis, Justus Liebig University Giessen.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Revis, Melanie, and Tobias Bernaisch
    2020 “The Pragmatic Nativisation of Pauses in Asian Englishes”. World Englishes39: 135–153. 10.1111/weng.12387
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12387 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schilk, Marco
    2011Structural Nativization in Indian English Lexicogrammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.46
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.46 [Google Scholar]
  55. Schneider, Edgar W.
    2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schneider, Klaus P., and Anne Barron
    2008 “Where Pragmatics and Dialectology Meet: Introducing Variational Pragmatics”. InKlaus P. Schneider and Anne Barron, eds.Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–32. 10.1075/pbns.178.02sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.178.02sch [Google Scholar]
  57. Sedlatschek, Andreas
    2009Contemporary Indian English: Variation and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g38
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g38 [Google Scholar]
  58. Senaratne, Chamindi D.
    2009Sinhala-English Code-Mixing in Sri Lanka: A Sociolinguistic Study. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Stoffel, Cornelis
    1901Intensives and Down-Toners. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Tagliamonte, Sali
    2008 “So Different and Pretty Cool! Recycling Intensifiers in Toronto, Canada”. English Language and Linguistics12: 361–394. 10.1017/S1360674308002669
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002669 [Google Scholar]
  61. Tagliamonte, Sali, and Chris Roberts
    2005 “So Weird; So Cool; So Innovative: The Use of Intensifiers in the Television Series Friends”. American Speech80: 280–300. 10.1215/00031283‑80‑3‑280
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-80-3-280 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tears for Fears
    Tears for Fears 1983Mad World. Santa Monica: Mercury.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Wagner, Susanne
    2019 “Why Very Good in India Might Be Pretty Good in North America”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics24: 445–489. 10.1075/ijcl.17063.wag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17063.wag [Google Scholar]
  64. Werner, Janina, and Joybrato Mukherjee
    2012 “Highly Polysemous Verbs in New Englishes: A Corpus-Based Study of Sri Lankan and Indian English”. InSebastian Hoffmann, Paul Rayson, and Geoffrey Leech, eds.Corpus Linguistics: Looking Back, Moving Forward. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 249–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Xiao, Richard
    2009 “Multidimensional Analysis and the Study of World Englishes”. World Englishes28: 421–450. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2009.01606.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01606.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Yule, Henry, and Arthur C. Burnell
    1886Hobson-Jobson: Being a Glossary of Anglo-Indian Colloquial Words and Phrases and of Kindred Terms. London: John Murray.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/eww.21064.fun
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.21064.fun
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error