Volume 44, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Spoken in a multilingual environment characterised by continuous contacts with other languages, Singapore English (SgE) is a singular object of study. Its modal system has also been developing in independent ways compared to inner-circle varieties, e.g. British English, its historical ancestor. Different approaches have attempted to explain such developments, including the substratist and the grammaticalisation approaches. The present paper explores both these approaches with the aim of examining the role that they may have in the development of the (semi-)modal verbs of necessity in SgE. Using some corpus analysis conducted on informal data, it will be shown why the substratist approach does not seem sufficient to explain the relatively frequent non-epistemic uses of in SgE. It will be discussed how SgE could be instead replicating older dynamic uses, typical of Middle English times (1100–1500 CE), according to a process known as replica grammaticalisation as recapitulation (Ziegeler 2014).


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. HardwareZone
    HardwareZone 2006 Singapore Press Holdings. https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg (accessedFebruary 10, 2022).
  2. ICE Great Britain
    ICE Great Britain. The International Corpus of English. Compiled atUniversity College London ice-corpora.net/ice/index.html (accessedNovember 25, 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Nihilani, Paroo, Ni Yibin, Anne Pakir, and Vincent Ooi
    2006The ICE Corpus: The International Corpus of English, Singapore. Release 1. ice-corpora.net/ice/index.html (accessedJanuary 20, 2022)
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Salary
    Salary 2000 The Rocket Studio, Singapore. https://forums.salary.sg (accessedFebruary 15, 2022).
  5. Survey of English Usage
    Survey of English Usage 1998The ICE Corpus: The International Corpus of English, Great Britain. Release 1. London: University College London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/projects/ice-gb/sampler/index.htm (accessedFebruary 15, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ziegeler, Debra, and Amelyn Thompson
    2007–2009The Flowerpod Corpus.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Alsagoff, Lubna
    2010 “English in Singapore: Culture, Capital and Identity in Linguistic Variation”. World Englishes291: 336–348. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2010.01658.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2010.01658.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Bao, Zhiming
    2005 “The Aspectual System of Singapore English and the Systemic Substratist Explanation”. Journal of Linguistics411: 237–267. 10.1017/S0022226705003269
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003269 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2010 “Must in Singapore English”. Lingua1201: 1727–1737. 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2015The Making of Vernacular Singapore English: System, Transfer and Filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139135375
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139135375 [Google Scholar]
  11. Byloo, Pieter, and Jan Nuyts
    2014 “Meaning Change in the Dutch Core Modals: (Inter)subjectification in a Grammatical Paradigm”. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia461: 85–116. 10.1080/03740463.2014.955978
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.955978 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burnley, David, and Alison Wiggins
    eds. 2005The Auchinleck Manuscript. Originally published in 1977 by Scolar Press in association with the National Library of Scotland.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. “Census of Population 2020 Statistical Release 1” 2021Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade & Industry, Republic of Singapore. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/publications/cop2020/sr1/cop2020sr1.pdf (accessedFebruary 2, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chambers, Raymond Wilson, and Walter W. Seton
    eds. 1914A Fifteenth-Century Courtesy Book and Two Franciscan Rules. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chao, Yuen Ren
    1968A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, Weirong
    2020The Grammar of Southern Min: The Hui’an Dialect. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501511868
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511868 [Google Scholar]
  17. Coates, Jennifer
    1983The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Collins, Peter
    2005 “The Modals and Quasi-Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Australian English and other Englishes”. English World-Wide261: 249–273. 10.1075/eww.26.3.02col
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.26.3.02col [Google Scholar]
  19. 2009Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042029095
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029095 [Google Scholar]
  20. Depraetere, Ilse, and An Verhulst
    2008 “Source of Modality: A Reassessment”. English Language and Linguistics121: 1–25. 10.1017/S1360674307002481
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674307002481 [Google Scholar]
  21. Deterding, David
    2007Singapore English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gisborne, Nikolas
    2007 “Dynamic Modality”. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics41: 46–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gregersen, Sune
    2020Early English Modals: Form, Function and Analogy. LOT, Netherlands Graduate School.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gupta, Anthea F.
    1991 “Almost a Creoloid: Singapore English”. California Linguistic Notes231: 9–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gupta, Anthea Fraser
    1992 “The Pragmatic Particles of Singapore Colloquial English”. Journal of Pragmatics181: 31–57. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90106‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90106-L [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, Michael A. K., and Edward McDonald
    2004 “Metafunctional Profile of the Grammar of Chinese”. InAlice Caffarel, James Robert Martin, and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, eds.Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 305–395. 10.1075/cilt.253.08hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253.08hal [Google Scholar]
  27. Hansen, Beke
    2018Corpus Linguistics and Sociolinguistics: A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal System of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004381520
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004381520 [Google Scholar]
  28. Heine, Bernd
    1993Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva
    2003 “On Contact-Induced Grammaticalization”. Studies in Language271: 529–572. 10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei [Google Scholar]
  30. 2005Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614132
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614132 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kachru, Braj B.
    1986The Alchemy of English. University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kachru, Braj. B.
    ed. 1992The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures (2nd ed.). University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel
    2014 “The Sketch Engine: ten years on”. Lexicography11: 7–36. https://www.sketchengine.eu (accessedFebruary 17, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Krug, Manfred, and Ole Schützler
    2013 “Recent Change and Grammaticalization”. InBas Aarts, Geoffrey Leech, Joanne Close, and Jeremy Smith, eds.The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 155–186. 10.1017/CBO9781139060998.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060998.008 [Google Scholar]
  36. Leech, Geoffrey
    2013 “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. InJuana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds.English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter. 95–115. 10.1515/9783110286328.95
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110286328.95 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
    2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lehmann, Christian
    1985 “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e stile201: 303–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Leimgruber, Jakob R. E.
    2009 “Modelling Variation in Singapore English”. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Oxford.
  41. Leimgruber, Jakob R.
    2013Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139225755
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225755 [Google Scholar]
  42. Leimgruber, Jakob R. E., Peter Siemund, and Laura Terassa
    2018 “Singaporean Students’ Language Repertoires and Attitudes Revisited”. World Englishes371: 282–306. 10.1111/weng.12292
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12292 [Google Scholar]
  43. Leimgruber, Jakob R., Jun Lie Lim, Wilkinson Gonzales, and Mie Hiramoto
    2020 “Ethnic and Gender Variation in the Use of Colloquial Singapore English Discourse Particles”. English Language and Linguistics251: 601–620. 10.1017/S1360674320000453
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674320000453 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lim, Lisa
    ed. 2004Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g33 [Google Scholar]
  45. Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
    2019 “Grammaticalization of Semi-Modals of Necessity in Asian Englishes”. English World-Wide401: 115–142. 10.1075/eww.00025.lou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00025.lou [Google Scholar]
  46. Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip
    2009 “Contact-Induced Grammaticalization: Evidence from Bilingual Acquisition”. Studies in Language331: 366–395. 10.1075/sl.33.2.06mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.2.06mat [Google Scholar]
  47. 2011Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Meillet, Antoine
    1915 “Le Renouvellement des Conjonctions”. Annuaire de I’École Pratique des Hautes Études 1915–6. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. 9–28. 10.3406/ephe.1915.9215
    https://doi.org/10.3406/ephe.1915.9215 [Google Scholar]
  49. 1958Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Générale. Paris. Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Narrog, Heiko
    2012Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo, and Janneke Diepeveen
    2010 “On Deontic Modality, Directivity, and Mood: The Case of Dutch mogen and moeten”. Journal of Pragmatics421: 16–34. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  52. Palmer, Frank R.
    1990Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Perkins, Michael
    1993Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Pietsch, Lukas
    2009 “Hiberno-English Medial-Object Perfects Reconsidered: A Case of Contact-Induced Grammaticalization”. Studies in Language331: 528–568. 10.1075/sl.33.3.02pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.3.02pie [Google Scholar]
  55. Platt, John T., and Heidi Weber
    1980English in Singapore and Malaysia: Status, Features, Functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Platt, John T., Heidi Weber, and Mian Lian Ho
    1984The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Rissannen, Matti
    1984The Helsinki Diachronic Corpus of English Texts (HDCET), electronic version. Department of English, University of Helsinki. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/14/rissanen_tyrkko/ (accessedFebruary 3, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Ross, Claudia, and Jin-Heng Sheng Ma
    2006Modern Mandarin Chinese Grammar: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203799932
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203799932 [Google Scholar]
  59. Schneider, Edgar W.
    2003 “The Dynamics of New Englishes: from Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language791: 233–281. 10.1353/lan.2003.0136
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0136 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2007Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  61. Siemund, Peter, Monika Edith Schulz, and Martin Schweinberger
    2014 “Studying the Linguistic Ecology of Singapore: A Comparison of College and University Students”. World Englishes331: 340–362. 10.1111/weng.12094
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12094 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Alexandra D’Arcy
    2007 “The Modals of Obligation/Necessity in Canadian Perspective”. English World-Wide281: 47–87. 10.1075/eww.28.1.04tag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.1.04tag [Google Scholar]
  63. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change”. Language791: 233–281. 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  64. van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir Plungian
    1998 “Modality’s Semantic Map”. Linguistic Typology21: 79–124. 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79 [Google Scholar]
  65. van der Auwera, Johan, Dirk Noël, and Astrid De Wit
    2012 “The Diverging Need (to)’s of Asian Englishes”. InMarianne Hundt, and Ulrike Gut, eds.Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 54–75. 10.1075/veaw.g43.03van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g43.03van [Google Scholar]
  66. Wee, Lionel
    2011Language Without rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Wiedenhof, Jeroen
    2015A Grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.197
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.197 [Google Scholar]
  68. Ziegeler, Debra
    2003a “On the Zero-Plural in Commercial Singaporean English”. InDavid Deterding, Adam Brown, and Ee-Ling Low, eds.English in Singapore: Research on Grammar. Singapore: McGraw Hill. 48–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 2003b “On the Generic Origins of Modality in English”. InDavid Hart, ed.English Modality in Context. Bern: Peter Lang. 33–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 2012 “On the Interaction of Past Tense and Potentiality in Singaporean Colloquial English”. Language Sciences341: 229–251. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.007 [Google Scholar]
  71. 2014 “Replica Grammaticalisation as Recapitulation: The Other Side of Contact”. Diachronica311: 106–141. 10.1075/dia.31.1.04zie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.1.04zie [Google Scholar]
  72. 2015 “Converging Grammars: Constructions in Singapore English”. InYaron Matras, ed.Language Contact and Bilingualism111. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 2017 “Historical Replication in Contact grammaticalization”. InVan Olmen Daniël, Hubert Cuyckens, and Lobke Ghesquière, eds.Aspects of Grammaticalization: (Inter)subjectification, Analogy and Unidirectionality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 311–352.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 2020 Changes in the Function of Already in Singapore English: A Grammaticalization Approach. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages351: 293–331. 10.1075/jpcl.00062.zie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.00062.zie [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error