1887
Volume 46, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730

Abstract

Abstract

Situated at the crossroads of English varieties studies, sociolinguistics, and typology, this paper offers an empirically-based discussion of practical and theoretical challenges involved in collecting speaker data for English varieties. The starting point is recent research on statistical trends between sociodemographic data, including speaker numbers, and linguistic structures. Such quantitative analyses depend on the availability and quality of speaker numbers and thus precipitate the collection of unavailable and well-documented data. In this vein, I detail how to extrapolate speaker numbers from open-access sources for a wide range of English varieties. Based on empirical use cases, practical issues like data quality and reliability are discussed. Furthermore, I illustrate how (the lack of uniform) definitions for concepts commonly used in census data like mother tongue or native speaker impact data collection. In short, this paper highlights key issues in collecting speaker numbers which have implications for research in English varieties and beyond.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25008.ehr
2025-09-19
2026-03-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eww.25008.ehr.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25008.ehr&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Afrobarometer
    Afrobarometer. “About”. 〈https://www.afrobarometer.org/about/〉 (accessedMay 03, 2023).
  2. Afrobarometer
    Afrobarometer 2022 “Résumé des résultats, Enquête d’Afrobarometer, Round 9 au Cameroun”. 〈https://www.afrobarometer.org/publication/cameroun-round-9-resume-des-resultats/〉 (accessedMay 03, 2023)
  3. Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek Suriname
    Algemeen Bureau voor de Statistiek Suriname 2014 “Suriname Census 2012, Volume 3,Huishoudens Gezinnen en Woonverblijven Milieu Criminaliteit”. Suriname. 〈https://statistics-suriname.org/census-statistics-2012/〉 (accessedJanuary 15, 2025).
  4. Alobwede D‘Epie, Charles
    1998 “Banning Pidgin English in Cameroon?”. English Today141: 54–60. 10.1017/S0266078400000742
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400000742 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anchimbe, Eric A.
    2013Language Policy and Identity Construction. The Dynamics of Cameroonian Multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.32
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.32 [Google Scholar]
  6. Atechi, Samuel
    2011 “Cameroon and Pidgin English”. Journal of Applied Linguistics (Dubai).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Atechi, Samuel, and Hans Fonka
    2007 “Pidgin English as a Lingua Franca in Cameroon”. Papers in English & Linguistics81: 40–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bayley, Robert
    2012 “Chicano English”. InBernd Kortmann and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds.The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 156–165. 10.1515/9783110280128.156
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280128.156 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bentz, Christian, and Bodo Winter
    2013 “Languages with More Second Language Learners Tend to Lose Nominal Case”. Language Dynamics and Change31: 1–27. 10.1163/22105832‑13030105
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-13030105 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bolton, Kingsley, and John Bacon-Shone
    2020 “The Statistics of English across Asia.” InKingsley Bolton, Werner Botha, and Patrick Kirkpatrick, eds.The Handbook of Asian Englishes. Hoboken: Wiley, 49–80. 10.1002/9781118791882.ch3
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118791882.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Britain, David, and Andrea Sudbury
    2012 “Falkland Island English”. InBernd Kortmann and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds.The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 669–676. 10.1515/9783110280128.669
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280128.669 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brittingham, Angela, and G. Patricia de la Cruz
    2004 “Ancestry: 2000, Census 2000 Brief”. United States Census Bureau 〈https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/2000/briefs/c2kbr-35.pdf〉 (accessedAugust 15, 2023).
  13. Cheng, Lauretta S. P., Danielle Burgess, Natasha Vernooij, Cecilia Solís-Barroso, Ashley McDermott, and Savithry Namboodiripad
    2021 “The Problematic Concept of Native Speaker in Psycholinguistics: Replacing Vague and Harmful Terminology with Inclusive and Accurate Measures”. Frontiers in Psychology121: 715843. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook, Vivian
    1999 “Going beyond the Native Speaker in Language Teaching”. TESOL Quarterly331: 185–209. 10.2307/3587717
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587717 [Google Scholar]
  15. Crystal, David
    2012English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139196970
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139196970 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2018The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108528931
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108528931 [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, Alan
    2003The Native Speaker: Myth and Reality. Vol.381. Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596247
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596247 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deuber, Dagmar
    2014English in the Caribbean: Variation, Style and Standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139226400
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139226400 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dewaele, Jean-Marc
    2018 “Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker’”. Applied Linguistics391: 236–240.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons, and Charles D. Fennig
    eds. 2023aEthnologue: Languages of the World. 26th ed.Dallas: SIL International.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. eds. 2023bEthnologue Global Dataset, 26th Edition Data. Dallas: SIL International.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ehret, Katharina
    . in preparation. “Extra-linguistic triggers of Morphosyntactic Variation in Englishes”.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Endangered Languages Project
    Endangered Languages Project. 〈https://endangeredlanguages.com/〉 (accessedFebruary 07, 2025).
  24. Falkland Islands Government, Directorate of Policy, Economy & Corporate Services
    Falkland Islands Government, Directorate of Policy, Economy & Corporate Services 20212021 Census, Census Tables, 〈https://www.falklands.gov.fk/policy/2021-census/census〉 (accessedJanuary 15, 2025)
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Faraclas, Nicholas
    2021 “Naija: A Language of the Future”. InAkinmade T. Akande, and Oladipo Salami, eds.Current Trends in Nigerian Pidgin English: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 9–38. 10.1515/9781501513541‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501513541-002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ghana Statistical Service
    Ghana Statistical Service 2022 Census 2021, General Report Highlights, Volume 3, 〈https://census2021.statsghana.gov.gh/〉 (accessedMay 22, 2025)
  27. Government of The Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, Ministry of Planning and Sustainable Development, Central Statistical Office
    Government of The Republic of Trinidad & Tobago, Ministry of Planning and Sustainable Development, Central Statistical Office 2012 Trinidad and Tobago 2011 Population and Housing Census Demographic Report. 〈https://cso.gov.tt/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2011-Demographic-Report.pdf〉 (accessedJuly 28, 2025)
  28. Graddol, David
    2003 “The Decline of the Native Speaker”. InGunilla M. Anderman, and Margaret Rogers, eds.Translation Today: Trends and Perspectives. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 152–167. 10.2307/jj.27710953.15
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27710953.15 [Google Scholar]
  29. Grinevald, Colette
    2003 “Speakers and Documentation of Endangered Languages”. Language Documentation and Description11: 52–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hackert, Stephanie
    2012The Emergence of the English Native Speaker: A Chapter in Nineteenth-Century Linguistic Thought. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511052 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2017 “The Native Speaker in World Englishes: A Historical Perspective”. InSusanne Mühleisen, ed.Contested Communities Communication, Narration, Imagination. Leiden: Brill, 1–21. 10.1163/9789004335288_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004335288_004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jourdan, Christine
    2021 “Pidgins and Creoles: Debates and Issues”. Annual Review of Anthropology501: 363–378. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑121319‑071304
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-121319-071304 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kauhanen, Henri, George Walkden, and Sarah Einhaus
    2023 “Language Structure is Influenced by the Proportion of Non-Native Speakers: A Reply to”. Journal of Language Evolution: 1–12. 10.1093/jole/lzad005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzad005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Koplenig, Alexander
    2019 “Language Structure is Influenced by the Number of Speakers but Seemingly not by the Proportion of Non-Native Speakers”. Royal Society Open Science61: 181274. 10.1098/rsos.181274
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181274 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2024 “Still No Evidence for an Effect of the Proportion of Non-Native Speakers on Natural Language Complexity”. Entropy261: 993. 10.3390/e26110993
    https://doi.org/10.3390/e26110993 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kortmann, Bernd, Kerstin Lunkenheimer, and Katharina Ehret
    eds. 2020The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110280128
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280128 [Google Scholar]
  37. Léglise, Isabelle
    2013Multilinguisme, Variation, Contact. Des Pratiques Langagières sur le Terrain à l’Analyse de Corpus Hétérogènes. Paris: INALCO.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lupyan, Gary, and Rick Dale
    2010 “Language Structure is Partly Determined by Social Structure”. PLoS ONE51: 1–10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008559
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008559 [Google Scholar]
  39. Melchers, Gunnel
    2012 “Orkney and Shetland English”. InBernd Kortmann and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds.The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 15–20. 10.1515/9783110280128.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280128.15 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mesthrie, Rajend
    2010 “New Englishes and the Native Speaker Debate”. Language Sciences321: 594–601. 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  41. Migge, Bettina
    2012 “Eastern Maroon Creole”. InIn Bernd Kortmann and Kerstin Lunkenheimer, eds.The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 279–290. 10.1515/9783110280128.279
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280128.279 [Google Scholar]
  42. Migge, Bettina, and Isabelle Léglise
    2015 “Assessing the Sociolinguistic Situation of the Maroon Creoles”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages301: 63–115. 10.1075/jpcl.30.1.03mig
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.30.1.03mig [Google Scholar]
  43. Ministry of Finance and Planning, Department of Census and Statistics
    Ministry of Finance and Planning, Department of Census and Statistics 2012 Census of Population and Housing 2012. 〈https://www.statistics.gov.lk/〉 (accessedJuly 28, 2025)
  44. Motel, Seth, and Eileen Patten
    2012 “The 10 Largest Hispanic Origin Groups: Characteristics, Rankings, Top Counties”. Pew Research Center. Washington, D.C. 〈https://www.pewresearch.org/〉 (accessedAugust 15, 2023)
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Namyalo, Saudah, Bebwa Isingoma, and Christiane Meierkord
    2016 “Towards Assessing the Space of English in Uganda’s Linguistic Ecology”. InChristiane Meierkord, Bebwa Isingoma, and Saudah Namyalo, eds.Ugandan English: Its Sociolinguistics, Structure and Uses in a Globalising Post-Protectorate. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 19–49. 10.1075/veaw.g59.02nam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g59.02nam [Google Scholar]
  46. National Records of Scotland
    National Records of Scotland 2022Scotland’s Census 2022, 〈https://www.scotlandscensus.gov.uk/〉 (accessedDecember 16, 2024)
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India
    Office of Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India 2011Census Tables, Census 2011. 〈https://censusindia.gov.in/census.website/data/census-tables〉 (accessedFebruary 20, 2024)
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Paolillo, John C., and Anupam Das
    2006 “Evaluating Language Statistics: The Ethnologue an Beyond.” Contract report for the UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Motel, Seth, and Eileen Patten
    2012 “The 10 Largest Hispanic Origin Groups: Characteristics,Rankings, Top Counties”. Pew Research Center. Washington, D.C.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rampton, M. Ben H.
    1990 “Displacing the “Native Speaker”: Expertise, Affiliation, and Inheritance”. ELT Journal441: 97–101. 10.1093/eltj/44.2.97
    https://doi.org/10.1093/eltj/44.2.97 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rendall, Thomas
    2013 “Perceptions of the Social and Cultural Factors which have Influenced the Use of Dialect in Orkney”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Open University (United Kingdom).
  52. Santa Ana, Otto
    1993 “Chicano English and the Nature of the Chicano Language Setting”. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences151: 3–35. 10.1177/07399863930151001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863930151001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Shcherbakova, Olena, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Hannah J. Haynie, Sam Passmore, Volker Gast, Russell D. Gray, Simon J. Greenhill, Damián E. Blasi, and Hedvig Skirgård
    2023 “Societies of Strangers do not Speak Less Complex Languages”. Science Advances91: eadf7704. 10.1126/sciadv.adf7704
    https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adf7704 [Google Scholar]
  54. Siegel, Jeff
    2010 “Pidgins and Creoles”. InNancy H. Hornberger and Sandra Lee McKay, eds.Sociolinguistics and Language Education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 232–262.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Siemund, Peter
    2023Multilingual Development: English in a Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108915540
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108915540 [Google Scholar]
  56. Simo Bobda, Augustin, and Innocent Fasse Mbouya
    2005 “Revisiting some Linguistic Concepts and Beliefs in the Light of the Sociolinguistic Situation of Cameroon”. InJames Cohen, Kara T. McAlister, Kellie Rolstad, and Jeff MacSwan, eds.Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Somerville: Cascadilla Press, 2122–2132.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Statistics Canada
    Statistics Canada. Census 2021, 〈https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/start〉 (accessedFebruary 24, 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tupas, Ruanni
    ed. 2015Unequal Englishes : The Politics of Englishes Today. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137461223
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137461223 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2022 “The Coloniality of Native Speakerism”. Asian Englishes241: 147–159. 10.1080/13488678.2022.2056797
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2056797 [Google Scholar]
  60. Trudgill, Peter
    2011Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Ubanako, Valentine Njende
    2021 “Is “Camfranglais” a New Language? A Review of Current Opinions”. International Linguistics Research41: 36–42. 10.30560/ilr.v4n1p36
    https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v4n1p36 [Google Scholar]
  62. Uganda Bureau of Statistics
    Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2024National Population and Housing Census 2024, Final Report — Volume 1 (Main). Kampala, Uganda. 〈https://www.ubos.org/nphc-2024-census-page〉 (accessedJanuary 15, 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  63. United Nations Population Fund (UNFA)
    United Nations Population Fund (UNFA). World Population Dashboard, 〈https://www.unfpa.org/data/world-population-dashboard〉 (accessedNovember 21, 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  64. United States Census Bureau
    United States Census Bureau 2021American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, 〈https://data.census.gov/〉 (accessedAugust 15, 2023)August 15, 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Vakunta, Peter Wuteh
    2018 “The Status of Pidgin English in the Cameroonian Tower of Babel: An Overview of the Linguistic Landscape of Cameroon which Calls for the Recognition of Cameroonian Pidgin English as an Official Language”. English Today341: 20–25. 10.1017/S026607841700044X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607841700044X [Google Scholar]
  66. Winford, Donald
    1997 “Re-Examining Caribbean English Creole Continua”. World Englishes161: 233–279. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00061
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00061 [Google Scholar]
  67. World Bank Open Data
    World Bank Open Data, 〈https://data.worldbank.org/〉 (accessedMay 08, 2023).
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25008.ehr
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25008.ehr
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error