1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. English World-Wide
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Rhoticity in Singapore English
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the variation in rhoticity in both casual and careful speech of Singaporeans, who are representative of the general population of educated Singapore English (SgE) speakers. This study expands the scope of previous research on rhoticity in SgE, e.g. Tan and Gupta (1992) and Tan (2012), by analysing both language-external and language-internal factors. While earlier studies primarily explored social correlates such as age, gender, ethnicity, and educational level, this research addresses a critical gap by examining phonological environments that condition /r/ realisation. Speech data were drawn from two distinct registers — read-aloud speeches and informal conversations — produced by SgE speakers of varying first language (L1) backgrounds. Statistical modelling identified three significant predictors of /r/ realisation: phonological context, preceding vowel, and dominant language. The findings underscore the unique status of the realised /r/ in SgE and the importance of both stylistic and phonological considerations in its distribution.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25040.yeo
2026-04-08
2026-04-11

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/eww.25040.yeo
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barr, Michael
    2019 Singapore: A Modern History. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 10.5040/9781788316446
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781788316446 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer, Laurie, and Paul Warren
    2004 “Curing the Goat’s Mouth”. InProceedings of the Tenth Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Canberra: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, Kara
    2009 “/r/ and the Construction of Place Identity on New York City’s Lower East Side 1”. Journal of Sociolinguistics: –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00426.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00426.x [Google Scholar]
  4. 2014 “(r) We There Yet? The Change to Rhoticity in New York City English”. Language Variation and Change: –. 10.1017/S0954394514000064
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000064 [Google Scholar]
  5. Blaxter, Tam, Kate Beeching, Richard Coates, James Murphy, and Emily Robinson
    2019 “Each P[ɚ]son does it th[εː] Way: Rhoticity Variation and the Community Grammar”. Language Variation and Change: –. 10.1017/S0954394519000048
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394519000048 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink
    2019 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 6.1.08. 〈https://www.praat.org/〉 (accessedApril 15, 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach”. Discourse Studies: –. 10.1177/1461445605054407
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bucholtz, Mary
    2010 White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975776
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975776 [Google Scholar]
  9. “Channel News Asia Singapore Parliament News”. 〈www.channelnewsasia.com/news/parliament〉 (accessedMay 2, 2021).
  10. Coupland, Nikolas, and Adam Jaworski
    2009 The New Sociolinguistics Reader. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑92299‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92299-4 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crystal, David
    2008 A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (The Language Library). Malden: John Wiley and Sons Incorporated. 10.1002/9781444302776
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776 [Google Scholar]
  12. Department of Statistics Singapore
    Department of Statistics Singapore 2020a “Census of Population 2020 Population. June 2021”. 〈https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/visualising_data/infographics/c2020/c2020-population.pdf〉 (accessedMay 2, 2021).
  13. Department of Statistics Singapore
    Department of Statistics Singapore 2020b “Census of Population 2020 Literacy and Home Language. June 2021”. 〈https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/visualising_data/infographics/c2020/c2020-literacy-homelanguage.pdf〉 (accessedMay 2, 2021).
  14. Deterding, David
    2007 Singapore English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Eckert, Penelope
    2008 “Variation and the Indexical Field 1”. Journal of Sociolinguistics: –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  16. 2012 “Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation”. Annual Review of Anthropology: –. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2019 “The Limits of Meaning: Social Indexicality, Variation, and the Cline of Interiority”. Language: –. 10.1353/lan.2019.0072
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0072 [Google Scholar]
  18. Feagin, Crawford
    1990 “Dynamics of Sound Change in Southern States English: From r-Less to r-Ful in Three Generations”. InJerold Edmondson, Crawford Feagin, and Peter Mülhäusler, eds.Development and Diversity: Language Variation Across Time and Space: A Festschrift for Charles-James N. Bailey. Arlington: SIL/University of Texas at Arlington, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gordon, Matthew
    2013 Labov: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781472541673
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541673 [Google Scholar]
  20. Harris, John
    2013 “Wide-Domain r-Effects in English”. Journal of Linguistics: –. 10.1017/S0022226712000369
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000369 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hay, Jennifer, and Andrea Sudbury
    2005 “How Rhoticity Became/r/-Sandhi”. Language: –. 10.1353/lan.2005.0175
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0175 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hebdige, Dick
    1984 Subculture: The Meaning of Style. New York: Methuen.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Infocommunications and Media Development Authority (IMDA)
    Infocommunications and Media Development Authority (IMDA) 2021 National Speech Corpus (NSC). 〈https://www.imda.gov.sg/about-imda/emerging-technologies-and-research/artificial-intelligence/national-speech-corpus〉 (accessedApril 15, 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson, Daniel E.
    2009 “Getting Off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis”. Language and Linguistics Compass: –. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  25. 2010 “Rbrul Manual”. 〈danielezrajohnson.com/rbrul.html〉 (accessedMay 18, 2021).
  26. 2019 Rbrul. Version 3.1.3. 〈www.danielezrajohnson.com/rbrul.html〉 (accessed18 May 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Koh, Jia Xin, Aqilah Mislan, Kevin Khoo, Brian Ang, Wilson Ang, Charmaine Ng, and Ying-Ying Tan
    2019 “Building the Singapore English National Speech Corpus”. INTERSPEECH: –. 10.21437/Interspeech.2019‑1525
     https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1525 [Google Scholar]
  28. Labov, William
    1966 “The Effect of Social Mobility on Linguistic Behaviour”. Sociological Inquiry: –. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1966.tb00624.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1966.tb00624.x [Google Scholar]
  29. 1969 “Contraction, Deletion, and Inherent Variability of the English Copula”. Language: –. 10.2307/412333
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412333 [Google Scholar]
  30. 1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2006 The Social Stratification of English in New York City (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618208 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ladefoged, Peter, and Ian Maddieson
    1996 The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Leimgruber, Jakob
    2009 “Modelling Variation in Singapore English”. PhD dissertation, Oxford University.
  34. Leong, Alvin, David Deterding, and Eeling Low
    2006 An Introduction to Linguistics. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia).
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Levshina, Natalia
    2015 How to do Linguistics with R. Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, Zeyu, and Barış Kabak
    2017 “Rhoticity in Chinese English: An Experimental Investigation on the Realization of the Variant (r) in an Expanding Circle Variety”. Alicante Journal of English Studies: –. 10.14198/raei.2017.30.03
     https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2017.30.03 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lim, Lisa
    2012 “Standards of English in South-East Asia”. InRaymond Hickey, ed.Standards of English. Codified Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, –. 10.1017/CBO9781139023832.015
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139023832.015 [Google Scholar]
  38. Low, Eeling, and Adam Brown
    2005 English in Singapore: An Introduction. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education (Asia).
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Marsden, Sharon
    2017 “Are New Zealanders “Rhotic”?: The Dynamics of Rhoticity in New Zealand’s Small Towns”. English World Wide: –. 10.1075/eww.38.3.02mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.38.3.02mar [Google Scholar]
  40. Melchers, Gunnel, and Philip Shaw
    2003 World Englishes. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Nagy, Naomi, and Patricia Irwin
    2010 “Boston (r): Neighbo(r)s Nea(r) and Fa(r)”. Language Variation and Change: –. 10.1017/S0954394510000062
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394510000062 [Google Scholar]
  42. Peters, Pam
    2020 “Norms and Standards in World Englishes”. InDaniel Schreier, Marianne Hundt, and Edgar W. Schneider, eds.The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Piercy, Caroline
    2012 “A Transatlantic Cross-Dialectal Comparison of Non-Prevocalic/r”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: .
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Poedjosoedarmo, Gloria
    1996 “Variation and Change in the Sound Systems of Brunei Dialects of Malay”. InPeter Martin, Conrad Ożóg, and Gloria Poedjosoedarmo, eds.Language Use and Language Change in Brunei Darussalam: Monographs in International Studies Southeast Asia Series. Athens: Ohio University Press, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 2000a “A Description of the English Pronunciation of Young Educated Singaporeans: A Study in Multidimensional Variation”. InAdam Brown, David Deterding, and Low Ee Ling, eds.The English Language in Singapore: Research on Pronunciation. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 2000b “The Media as a Model and Source of Innovation in the Development of Singapore Standard English”. InAdam Brown, David Deterding, and Low Ee Ling, eds.The English Language in Singapore: Research on Pronunciation. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2021 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Version4.0.0 〈https://www.R-project.org/〉 (accessedMay 18, 2021).
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Republic of Singapore
    Republic of Singapore 2021 “Constitution of the Republic of Singapore: Section 153A Official Languages and National Language”. 〈https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CONS1963?ProvIds=P1XIII-〉 (accessedMay 2, 2021).
  49. Roach, Peter
    2009 English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Robb, Michael P., Margaret Maclagan, and Chen Yang
    2004 “Speaking Rates of American and New Zealand Varieties of English”. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics: –. 10.1080/0269920031000105336
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0269920031000105336 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rosenfelder, Ingrid
    2009 “Sociophonetic Variation in Educated Jamaican English: An Analysis of the Spoken Component of ICE-Jamaica”. PhD dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
  52. Salbrina, Sharbawi, and David Deterding
    2010 “Rhoticity in Brunei English”. English World-Wide: –. 10.1075/eww.31.2.01sha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.31.2.01sha [Google Scholar]
  53. San, Duanmu
    2007 The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Sankoff, David, Sali A. Tagliamonte, and Eric Smith
    2005 GoldVarb X: a variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto. 〈individual.utoronto.ca/tagliamonte/Goldvarb/GV_index.htm〉
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Schneider, Edgar W.
    2007 Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2020 English Around the World: An Introduction (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108656726
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108656726 [Google Scholar]
  57. Schoux Casey, Christina
    2016 “Ya Heard Me? Rhoticity in Post-Katrina New Orleans English”. American speech: –. 10.1215/00031283‑3633107
     https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-3633107 [Google Scholar]
  58. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life”. Language and Communication: –. 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  59. Starr, Rebecca, and Tianxiao Wang
    2021 “Navigating Variation Amid Contested Norms and Societal Shifts”. InAnna Ghimenton, Aurélie Nardy, and Jean-Pierre Chevrot, eds.Sociolinguistic Variation and Language Acquisition Cross the Lifespan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/silv.26.09sta
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.26.09sta [Google Scholar]
  60. Stuart-Smith, Jane, Eleanor Lawson, and James M. Scobbie
    2014 “De-Rhoticisation in Scottish English: A Sociophonetic Journey”. InChiara Celata, and Silvia Calamai, eds.Advances in Sociophonetics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/silv.15.03stu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.15.03stu [Google Scholar]
  61. Tan, Chor Hiang and Anthea Fraser Gupta
    1992 “Post-Vocalic /r/ in Singapore English”. York Papers in Linguistics: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Tan, Ying Ying
    2012 “To r or not to r: Social Correlates of /ɹ/ in Singapore English”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language: –. 10.1515/ijsl‑2012‑0057
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2012-0057 [Google Scholar]
  63. Teo, Ming Chew
    2020 Crosslinguistic Influence in Singapore English: Linguistic and Social Aspects. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429463853
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429463853 [Google Scholar]
  64. Thomas, Erik R.
    2004 “Rural Southern White Accents”. InEdgar W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie, and Clive Upton, eds.A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 2011 Sociophonetics: An Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑28561‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28561-4 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tod, Danielle
    2024 “We/r/Tongan, not American: Variation and the Social Meaning of Rhoticity in Tongan English”. Journal of Sociolinguistics: –. 10.1111/josl.12664
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12664 [Google Scholar]
  67. Upton, Clive
    2004 “Received Pronunciation”. InSchneider, Edgar W., Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie, and Clive Upton, eds.A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Wee, Lionel
    2004 “Singapore English: Phonology”. InSchneider, Edgar W., Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie, and Clive Upton, eds.A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 1. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 2018 The Singlish Controversy: Language, Culture and Identity in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316855331
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316855331 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wells, John Corson
    1982 Accents of English: Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611759
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611759 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wong, Jock
    2014 The Culture of Singapore English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139519519
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519519 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25040.yeo
Loading
Rhoticity in Singapore English
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.25040.yeo
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25040.yeo
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25040.yeo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: rhoticity ; Singapore English ; authentic speech ; identity ; indexicality ; statistical modelling ; variation ; World Englishes

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error