1887
image of “Only fools don’t change their mind(s)”
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The present study investigates plural non-verbal concord — the variation between the distributive plural (e.g., ) and the distributive singular (e.g., ) forms following a plural subject — in two inner circle varieties, British and American English, and two newer Englishes, Nigerian and Singapore English. We focus on usage patterns for six high-frequency, potentially variable constructions (, , , , , ). Using both corpus data and results from a single-choice three-option preference test, we shed light on differences between the four varieties. British and American English show high consistency between corpus norms and speaker intuition, whereas Singapore and Nigerian English display broader divergences between corpus and preference data across the constructions. The results suggest that, for certain constructions, the distributive singular and plural forms may be in free variation among speakers of the newer Englishes, indicating a wider range of acceptable linguistic choices than the more established norms of the inner circle varieties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25060.rud
2026-08-18
2026-09-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Davies, Mark
    2013Corpus of Global Web-Based English. Available online at 〈https://www.english-corpora.org/glowbe/〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aarts, Bas, Sylvia Chalker and Edmund Weiner
    2014The Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Akinola, Aderonke and Rotimi Oladipupo
    2021 “Word-stress free variation in Nigerian English: A corpus-based study”. English Today: –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/S026607842100002X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607842100002X [Google Scholar]
  4. Alsagoff, Lubna and Ho Chee Lick
    1998 “The Grammar of Singapore English”. InJoseph A. Foley, Thiru Kandiah, Zhiming Bao, Anthea Fraser Gupta, Lubna Alsagoff, Chee Lick Ho, Lionel H. A. Wee, Ismail L. Talib and Wendy Bokhorst-Heng, eds.English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press–.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhatt, Rakesh M.
    1995 “Prescriptivism, Creativity and World Englishes”. World Englishes: –. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1995.tb00354.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1995.tb00354.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, R. Harald
    2008Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bader, Markus
    2023 “How Free is the Position of German Object Pronouns?” InKristin Kopf, and Thilo Weber, eds.Free Variation in Grammar: Empirical and Theoretical approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/slcs.234.02bad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234.02bad [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker, Mark C.
    2008The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619830
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619830 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bolinger, Dwight L.
    1977Meaning and Form. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bondaruk, Anna, Grete Dalmi, and Alexander Grosu
    2014Advances in the Syntax of DP’s. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.217
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.217 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, Keith, and Jim Miller
    2013The Cambridge Dictionary of Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139049412
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139049412 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cappelle, Bert
    2006 “Particle Placement and the Case for ‘Allostructions’”. InDoris Schönefeld, ed.Constructions All Over: Case Studies and Theoretical Implications. Special issue ofConstructions. 10.24338/cons‑381
    https://doi.org/10.24338/cons-381 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2009 “Can We Factor Out Free Choice?” InAndreas Dufter, Jürg Fleischer and Guido Seiler, eds.Describing and Modeling Variation in Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, –. 10.1515/9783110216097.3.183
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216097.3.183 [Google Scholar]
  14. Camacho-Taboada, Victoria, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández and Javier Martín-González, Mariano Reyes-Tejedor
    2013Information Structure and Agreement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.197
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.197 [Google Scholar]
  15. Corbett, Greville
    2000Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164344
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164344 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2006Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dako, Kari
    2015 “Should it be Omanhenes, Amanhenes or Amanhene? Or Are They in Free Variation?” Language Matters (Pretoria, South Africa) : –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. D’Alessandro, Roberta, Susann Fischer, and Gunnar H. Hrafnbjargarson
    2008Agreement Restrictions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110207835
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207835 [Google Scholar]
  19. Davies, Mark and Robert Fuchs
    2015 “Expanding Horizons in the Study of World Englishes with the 1.9 Billion Word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE)”. World Englishes: –. 10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav [Google Scholar]
  20. Dušková, Libuše, Dagmer Knittlová, Jaroslav Peprník, Zdeňka Strnadová and Jarmila Tárnyiková
    2006Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny [Grammar of Contemporary English against the Background of Czech]. 2nd ed.Praha: Academia.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellis, Rod
    1999 “Item Versus System Learning: Explaining Free Variation”. Applied Linguistics: –. 10.1093/applin/20.4.460
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.4.460 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fleischer, Jürg, Elisabeth Rieken, and Paul Widmer
    2015Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110399967
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110399967 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldberg, Adele E.
    1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Haiman, John
    1980 “The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation”. Language: –. 10.2307/414448
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414448 [Google Scholar]
  25. Halpert, Claire
    2016Argument Licensing and Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Henderson, Alice
    2010 “A Corpus-based Pilot Study of Lexical Stress Variation in American English”. Research in Language: –. 10.2478/v10015‑010‑0002‑9
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-010-0002-9 [Google Scholar]
  27. Higuchi, Akihiko
    1992 “New English in the Education System-Focusing on Singaporean English”. JALT Journal: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ho, Mian-Lian, and John T. Platt
    1993Dynamics of a Contact Continuum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  30. Joos, Martin
    1968 [1959] “The Isolation of Styles”. InJoshua A. Fishman, ed.Readings in the Sociology of Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Keine, Stefan
    2010Case and Agreement from Fringe to Core: A Minimalist Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110234404
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110234404 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, Chonghyuck, Qizhong Chang, and Leslie Lee
    2009 “Number Marking in Colloquial Singapore English”. Journal of Cognitive Science: –. 10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.149 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kopf, Kristin, Thilo Weber
    2023 “Free Variation, Unexplained Variation?” InKristin Kopf, and Thilo Weber (eds.), Free Variation in Grammar: Empirical and theoretical approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/slcs.234
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kopf, Kristin and Thilo Weber
    2023Free Variation in Grammar: Empirical and theoretical approaches (Studies in Language Companion Series 234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.234
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234 [Google Scholar]
  35. Labov, William
    1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Leimgruber, Jakob R. E.
    2013Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139225755
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225755 [Google Scholar]
  37. Luzondo Oyón, Alba
    2013 “Revisiting Goldberg’s Semantic Constraints on the ‘Way’ Construction”. Revista Espanola de Lingüística Aplicada: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mair, Christian
    2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”. World Englishes: –. 10.1075/eww.36.1.02mai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.02mai [Google Scholar]
  39. Mathesius, Vilém
    (1911/1983) “On the Potentiality of the Phenomena of Language”. InJosef Vachek, and Libuše Dušková, eds.Praguiana: Some Basic and Less Known Aspects of the Prague Linguistic School. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, –.10.1075/llsee.12.05mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/llsee.12.05mat [Google Scholar]
  40. Mesthrie, Rajend, and Rakesh M. Bhatt
    2008World Englishes: The study of new linguistic varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791321
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791321 [Google Scholar]
  41. Perek, Florent
    2018 “Recent Change in the Productivity and Schematicity of the Way-Construction: a Distributional Semantic Analysis”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory: –. 10.1515/cllt‑2016‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0014 [Google Scholar]
  42. Preston, Dennis R.
    1996 “Variationist Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition”. InDennis R. Preston, and Robert Bayley, eds.Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Variation [Studies in Bilingualism (SiBil)]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/sibil.10.02pre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.10.02pre [Google Scholar]
  43. Prolific
    Prolific 2024Prolific. 〈https://www.prolific.com〉 (accessedApril 2025).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Rataj, Maciej
    2023 “English in Singapore, a City of Migrants: Standard Dialect Ideology and Attitudes Towards Singlish”. Beyond Philology: –. 10.26881/bp.2023.2.02
    https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2023.2.02 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2023 “Syntactic Priming and Individual Preferences: A Corpus-based Analysis”. InKristin Kopf and Thilo Weber, eds.Free Variation in Grammar: Empirical and Theoretical Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/slcs.234.09ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234.09ros [Google Scholar]
  46. Rudnicka, Karolina, and Aleš Klégr
    2023 “Non-verbal Plural Number Agreement Between the Distributive Plural and Singular: Blocking Factors and Free Variation”. InKristin Kopf and Thilo Weber, eds.Free Variation in Grammar: Empirical and Theoretical Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, –. 10.1075/slcs.234.04rud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.234.04rud [Google Scholar]
  47. Rudnicka, Karolina
    2024 “Non-verbal Plural Number Agreement — a Pilot Study Comparing English and German using Oslo Multilingual Corpus Data”. Slovo a slovesnost: –. 10.58756/s1118554
    https://doi.org/10.58756/s1118554 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rudnicka, Karolina, and Aleš Klégr
    2024 “Non-verbal Plural Number Agreement in the Cross-linguistic Context: Combining Corpus Findings with Two Kinds of Acceptability Rating Results for English, German, Polish, and Czech”. Nordic Journal of English Studies: –. 10.35360/njes.v23i2.39166
    https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.v23i2.39166 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rudnicka, Karolina, and Richard J. Whitt
    2025 “When People Overload The/Their Stomach(s): Non-verbal Plural Number Agreement and Generic Reference in Early and Late Modern Medical Discourse”. Gavin Brookes, Niall Curry, Tony McEnery, and Emma Putland, eds.Historical Medical Discourse: Corpus Linguistic Perspectives. New York: Routledge, –. 10.4324/9781003467014‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003467014-7 [Google Scholar]
  50. Scheurweghs, Gustave
    1961Present-Day English Syntax. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Schibsbye, Knud
    1965A Modern English Grammar. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Schneider, Edgar W.
    2023 “The Role of Prescriptivism in the Emergence of New Englishes”. InJoan C. Beal, Morana Lukač, and Robin Straaijer, eds.The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Prescriptivism. Abingdon: Routledge, –. 10.4324/9781003095125‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095125-8 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sey, Kofi Abakah
    1973Ghanaian English. London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Shitara, Yûko
    1993 “A Survey of American Pronunciation Preferences”. Speech Hearing and Language: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sørensen, Knud
    1985 “The Distributive Plural and Its Limits”. English Studies(): –. 10.1080/00138388508598398
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00138388508598398 [Google Scholar]
  56. Stenroos, Merja
    2002 “Free Variation and Other Myths: Interpreting Historical English Spelling”. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Uhrig, Peter
    2015 “Why the Principle of No Synonymy is Overrated”. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik: –. 10.1515/zaa‑2015‑0030
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2015-0030 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wells, John C.
    1999 “British English Pronunciation Preferences: a Changing Scene”. Journal of the International Phonetic Association: –. 10.1017/S002510030000640X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S002510030000640X [Google Scholar]
  59. Wickham Hadley
    Wickham Hadley 2016Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. ISBN978-3-319-24277-4, 〈https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org〉.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Wood, Frederick T.
    1957 “Singular or Plural? A Question of Concord”. Moderna Språk.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Zandvoort, R. W.
    1957A Handbook of English Grammar. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Ziegeler, Debra
    2021 “Grammatical Change and Diversity in Singapore English”. InPeter Siemund, and Jakob R. E. Leimgruber, eds.Multilingual Global Cities: Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai. Singapore: Routledge, –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25060.rud
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.25060.rud
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: concord ; preference testing ; free variation ; World Englishes ; corpus linguistics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error