1887
Volume 38, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The Afro-Caribbean English-lexifier Creoles (AECs) exhibit fascinating combinations of disparate typological characteristics. I present a model of post-formative (“post-creolization”) contact and change and provide a comprehensive inventory of contact constellations in Africa and the Caribbean. I conduct a comparative analysis of causative constructions in seven African and Caribbean AECs, argue for the notional separation of the traditional creolist terms “superstrate”, “lexifier”, “substrate” and “adstrate”, and account for the linguistic-structural relevance of these distinctions. The model can explain the typological diversity within and across the AECs, help elucidate their genealogical and areal differentiation, and contribute to our understanding of the processes and outcomes of language contact and change in multilingual ecologies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.38.1.04yak
2017-06-17
2019-11-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aboh, Enoch
    2016 “Creole Distinctiveness: A Dead End”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages31: 400–418. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.31.2.07abo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.31.2.07abo [Google Scholar]
  2. Aboh, Enoch Oladé
    2015The Emergence of Hybrid Grammars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139024167
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139024167 [Google Scholar]
  3. Agheyisi, Rebecca Nogieru
    1971West African Pidgin English: Simplification and Simplicity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Agyekum, Kofi
    2004 “Causativity in Akan”. In Mary E. Kropp Dakub , and Emmanuel K. Osam , eds.Studies in the Languages of the Volta Basin. Vol.2. Legon: Linguistics Department, University of Ghana, 217–227.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Alleyne, Mervyn C.
    1980Comparative Afro-American: An Historical-Comparative Study of English-based Afro-American Dialects of the New World. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ameka, Felix K.
    2005 “Multiverb Constructions on the West African Littoral: Microvariation and Areal Typology”. In Mila Dimitrova-Vulchanova , and Tor A. Åfarli , eds.Grammar and beyond: Essays in Honour of Lars Hellan. Oslo: Novus, 15–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Ansaldo, Umberto
    2009Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511642203
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642203 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bamgbose, Ayo
    1966A Grammar of Yoruba. Vol.5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bickel, Balthasar
    2015 “Distributional Typology: Statistical Inquiries into the Dynamics of Linguistic Diversity”. InBernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, eds.The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 901–923.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bickerton, Derek
    1973 “On the Nature of a Creole Continuum”. Language49: 640–669. doi: 10.2307/412355
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412355 [Google Scholar]
  11. Capo, Hounkpati B. Christophe
    1993 “Les langues gbe: convergences et/ou divergences?”Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter5: 5–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chaudenson, Robert
    1992Des îles, des hommes, des langues: essai sur la créolisation linguistique et culturelle. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Comrie, Bernard
    1976The Syntax of Causative Constructions: Cross-Language Similarities and Divergences. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Corum, Micah
    2015Substrate and Adstrate: The Origins of Spatial Semantics in West African Pidgincreoles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614514626
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514626 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cristofaro, Sonia
    2003Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Croft, William
    2000Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Chicago: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dawson, Hope
    2003 “Defining the Outcome of Language Contact: Old English and Old Norse”. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics57: 40–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. DeCamp, David
    1971 “Toward a Generative Analysis of a Post-Creole Speech Continuum”. In Dell Hymes , ed.Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 349–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Deuber, Dagmar
    2005Nigerian Pidgin in Lagos: Language Contact, Variation and Change in an African Urban Setting. London: Battlebridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Duah, Reginald A.
    2013 “Force Dynamics and Causation in Akan”. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Ghana, Legon.
  21. Faraclas, Nicholas Gregory
    1988 “Nigerian Pidgin and the Languages of Southern Nigeria”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages3: 176–197. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.3.2.03far
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.3.2.03far [Google Scholar]
  22. Farquharson, Joseph T.
    2012 “The African Lexis in Jamaican: Its Linguistics and Sociohistorical Significance”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica.
  23. Ferrer, Eduardo Blasco
    2011 “Methode gegen Zufall. Prinzipien und Erkenntnisse der Substrataforschung am Beispiel der Toponomastik im Mittelmeer”. Indogermanische Forschungen116: 271–299. doi: 10.1515/9783110239485.271
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110239485.271 [Google Scholar]
  24. Finney, Malcolm Awadajin
    2011 “Krio (Sierra Leone Creole)”. In Bernd Kortmann , and Kerstin Lunkenheimer , eds.Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. ewave-atlas.org/languages/36 (accessed October 5, 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. François, Alexandre
    2011 “Social Ecology and Language History in the Northern Vanuatu Linkage: A Tale of Divergence and Convergence”. Journal of Historical Linguistics1: 175–246. doi: 10.1075/jhl.1.2.03fra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.1.2.03fra [Google Scholar]
  26. Gaetano, Berruto
    2005 “Dialect/Standard Convergence, Mixing, and Models of Language Contact: The Case of Italy”. In Peter Auer , Frans Hinskens , and Paul Kerswill , eds.Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
    2012 “Lexical Infelicity in English Causative Constructions: Comparing Native and Learner Collostructions”. In Jaako Leino , and Ruprecht von Waldenfels , eds.Analytical Causatives from “make” to “laskma”. München: Lincom Europa, 41–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Haig, Geoffrey
    2001 “Linguistic Diffusion in Present-Day East Anatolia: From Top to Bottom”. In Aleksandra Y. Aikhenvald , and Robert M. W. Dixon , eds.Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–224.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hancock, Ian F.
    1971 “A Study of the Sources and Development of the Lexicon of Sierra Leone Krio”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, UK.
  30. Hayward, Richard J.
    1991 “A propos Patterns of Lexicalization in the Ethiopian Language Area”. In Ulrike Claudi , and Daniela Mendel , eds.Ägypten im afro-orientalischen Kontext: Aufsätze zur Archäologie, Geschichte und Sprache eines unbegrenzten Raumes. Gedenkschrift Peter Behrens. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag, 139–156.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Holm, John
    ed. 1983Central American English. Heidelberg: Julius Groos Verlag. doi: 10.1075/veaw.t2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.t2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Huber, Magnus
    1999Ghanaian Pidgin English in its West African Context: A Sociohistorical and Structural Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g24 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2012 “Ghanaian Pidgin”. In Susanne Michaelis , Philippe Maurer , Martin Haspelmath , and Magnus Huber , eds.The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures (APiCS). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ihemere, Kelechukwu Uchechukwu
    2006 “A Basic Description and Analytic Treatment of Noun Clauses in Nigerian Pidgin”. Nordic Journal of African Studies15: 296–313.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Johanson, Lars
    2002 “Contact-Induced Change in a Code-Copying Framework”. In Mari C. Jones , and Edith Esch , eds.Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External, and Extra-linguistic Factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 285–314. doi: 10.1515/9783110892598.285
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892598.285 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kluge, Angela
    2006 “Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Grammatical Features Elicited among the Gbe Language Varieties of West Africa”. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics27: 53–86. doi: 10.1515/JALL.2006.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JALL.2006.004 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kouwenberg, Silvia , and John V. Singler
    eds. 2008The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444305982
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305982 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lambert-Brétière, Renée
    2005 “Les constructions sérielles en fon: approche typologique”. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2.
  39. Law, Danny
    2013 Inherited Similarity and Contact-Induced Change in Mayan Languages. Journal of Language Contact6: 271–299. doi: 10.1163/19552629‑00602004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-00602004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Leben, William
    1973 “Suprasegmental Phonology”. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  41. Lehmann, Christian
    1988 “Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage”. In John Haiman , and Sandra A. Thompson , eds.Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 181–225. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
  42. Leino, Jaako , and Ruprecht von Waldenfels
    eds. 2012Analytical Causatives from “make” to “laskma”. München: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Leung, Glenda A.
    2012 “A Synchronic Sociophonetic Study of Monophthongs in Trinidadian English”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Freiburg.
  44. Lim, Lisa , and Umberto Ansaldo
    2015Languages in Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Mattheier, Klaus J.
    1996 “Varietätenkonvergenz: Überlegungen zu einem Baustein einer Theorie der Sprachvariation”. Sociolinguistica10: 31–52. doi: 10.1515/9783110245158.31
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245158.31 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mayer, Mercer
    1969Frog, Where Are You?New York: Dial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Migge, Bettina
    2003Creole Formation as Language Contact: The Case of the Surinamese Creoles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.25 [Google Scholar]
  48. Mufwene, Salikoko S.
    1996 “The Founder Principle in Creole Genesis”. Diachronica13: 83–134. doi: 10.1075/dia.13.1.05muf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.13.1.05muf [Google Scholar]
  49. 2001The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511612862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612862 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2005Créoles, écologie sociale, évolution linguistique. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Muysken, Pieter , and Norval Smith
    eds. 2015Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110343977
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110343977 [Google Scholar]
  52. Næss, Åshild
    2007Prototypical Transitivity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.72
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.72 [Google Scholar]
  53. Nedyalkov, Vladimir P. , and Georgij G. Silnitsky
    1973 “The Typology of Morphological and Lexical Causatives”. In Ferenc Kiefer , ed.Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1–32. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑2536‑2_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2536-2_1 [Google Scholar]
  54. Rickford, John R.
    1987Dimensions of a Creole Continuum: History, Texts, and Linguistic Analysis of Guyanese Creole. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Selbach, Rachel
    2008 “The Superstrate Is not always the Lexifier: Lingua Franca in the Barbary Coast 1530–1830”. In Susanne Michaelis , ed.Roots of Creole Structures: Weighing the Contribution of Substrates and Superstrates. Philadelphia: Benjamins, 29–58. doi: 10.1075/cll.33.05sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.33.05sel [Google Scholar]
  56. Singler, John Victor
    1988 “The Homogeneity of the Substrate as a Factor in Pidgin/Creole Genesis”. Language64: 27–51. doi: 10.2307/414784
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414784 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sluijs, Robbert van , Margot van den Berg , and Pieter Muysken
    2016 “Exploring Genealogical Blends: The Surinamese Creole Cluster and the Virgin Island Dutch Creole Cluster”. Lingua178: 84–103. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  58. Smith, Norval
    2015a “The Early History of Surinam: Why is Surinam Different?”In Pieter Muysken , and Norval Smith , eds.Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 17–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 2015b “Ingredient X: The Shared African Lexical Element in the English-Lexifier Atlantic Creoles, and the Theory of Rapid Creolization”. In Pieter Muysken , and Norval Smith , eds.Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 67–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Snow, Peter
    2002 “Language Variation in Caribbean Creole/Non-Lexifier Contact Situations: Continua or Diglossia?”In Ritsuko Kataoka , Cassandra Moore , and Katherine Zilkha , eds.Texas Linguistic Forum44: 148–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Song, Jae Jung
    1996Causatives and Causation: A Universal-Typological Perspective. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 2013 “Periphrastic Causative Constructions”. InMatthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath, eds.The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/chapter/110 (accessed October 5, 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Sylvain, Suzanne
    1936Le créole haitien: morphologie et syntaxe. Wetteren, Belgium: Imprimerie de Meester.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Taylor, Douglas
    1956 “Language Contacts in the West Indies”. Word13: 399–414. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1956.11659610
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1956.11659610 [Google Scholar]
  65. Thomason, Sarah G. , and Terrence Kaufman
    1988Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Todd, Loreto
    1994 “Pidgins and Creoles”. In Robert E. Asher , and James M. Y. Simpson , eds.The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 9. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 3177–3181.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Waldenfels, Ruprecht von
    2012The Grammaticalization of “Give” + Infinitive, A Comparative Study of Russian, Polish, and Czech. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. www.degruyter.com/view/product/184803 (accessed April 25, 2016). doi: 10.1515/9783110293777
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110293777 [Google Scholar]
  68. Westermann, Diedrich
    1907Grammatik der Ewe-Sprache. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer (Ernst Vohsen). doi: 10.1515/9783111694191
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111694191 [Google Scholar]
  69. Winford, Donald
    1993Predication in Caribbean English Creoles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.10 [Google Scholar]
  70. 1997 “Re-Examining Caribbean English Creole Continua”. World Englishes16: 233–279. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00061
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00061 [Google Scholar]
  71. Winford, Donald , and Bettina Migge
    2007 “Substrate Influence on the Emergence of the TMA Systems of the Surinamese Creoles”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages22; 73–99. doi: 10.1075/jpcl.22.1.06win
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.22.1.06win [Google Scholar]
  72. Witzel, Michael
    1999 “Early Sources for South Asian Substrate Languages”. Mother Tongue (Special issue on South Asia), 1–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Yakpo, Kofi
    2009 “A Grammar of Pichi”. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
  74. 2012 “Betwixt and between: Causatives in the English-Lexicon Creoles of West Africa and the Caribbean”. In Jaako Leino , and Ruprecht von Waldenfels , eds.Analytical Causatives from “make” to “laskma”. München: Lincom Europa, 9–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 2013 “Wayward Daughter: Language Contact in the Emergence of Pichi (Equatorial Guinea) ”. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics34: 275–299. doi: 10.1515/jall‑2013‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2013-0009 [Google Scholar]
  76. 2015 “Code-Switching and Social Change: Convergent Language Mixing in a Multilingual Society”. In Gerald Stell , and Kofi Yakpo , eds.Codeswitching between Structural and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 259–287.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 2016 “‘The only language we speak really well’. The English Creoles of Equatorial Guinea and West Africa at the Intersection of Language Ideologies and Language Policies”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language239: 211–233.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Yakpo, Kofi , and Pieter Muysken
    2014 “Language Change in a Multiple Contact Setting: The Case of Sarnami (Suriname)”. In Isabelle Buchstaller , Anders Holmberg , and Mohammad Almoaily , eds.Pidgins and Creoles beyond Africa-Europe Encounters. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 101–140. doi: 10.1075/cll.47.06yak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.47.06yak [Google Scholar]
  79. Yakubovich, Ilya
    2010Sociolinguistics of the Luvian Language. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/eww.38.1.04yak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.38.1.04yak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): adstrate , Africa , areal , Caribbean , causative , Creole , lexifier , substrate , superstrate and typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error