1887
Volume 38, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0172-8865
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9730
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This large-scale corpus study explores new parameters which might indicate grammaticalization of the -passive in recent American English, where the construction has increased in frequency. To this end, large samples of both - and -passives from the TIME Magazine Corpus were analyzed with regard to tense, aspect, and situation type (). While tense and aspect preferences of the passives were diachronically stable, the results of the situation-type analysis were of interest for two reasons. First, they showed clear differences in the way - and -passives are used which reflect the -passive’s inchoative origins. And second, the diachronic analysis of situation-type preferences for -passives provides a first indication that they may be further grammaticalizing as they begin to behave more like canonical -passives in the most recent data. This finding is tentatively supported by supplementary data from COHA.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/eww.38.3.03sch
2017-12-01
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Davies, Mark
    2007 TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s–2000s. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/TIME/.
  2. 2010 The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/coha/.
  3. Biber, Douglas , Stig Johansson , Geoffrey Leech , Susan Conrad , and Edward Finegan
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carter, Ronald , and Michael McCarthy
    1999 “The English Get-Passive in Spoken Discourse: Description and Implication for an Interpersonal Grammar”. English Language and Literature3: 41–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chappell, Hilary
    1980 “Is the Get-Passive Adversative”? Papers in Linguistics13: 411–452. doi: 10.1080/08351818009370504
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818009370504 [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairclough, Norman
    1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Farrelly, Michael , and Elena Seoane
    2012 “Democratization”. In Terttu Nevalainen , and Elizabeth Closs Traugott , eds.The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 392–401.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fleisher, Nicholas
    2006 “The Origin of Passive Get ”. English Language and Linguistics10: 225–252. doi: 10.1017/S1360674306001912
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306001912 [Google Scholar]
  9. Garey, Howard B.
    1957 “Verbal Aspect in French”. Language33: 91–110. doi: 10.2307/410722
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410722 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbs, Wolcott
    1936 “Backward Ran Sentences until Reeled the Mind”. The New Yorker, Nov. 28, 1936.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Haegeman, Liliane
    1985 “The Get-Passive and Burzio’s Generalization”. Lingua66: 53–77. doi: 10.1016/S0024‑3841(85)90256‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(85)90256-6 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hopper, Paul J. , and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization (7th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  13. Huddleston, Rodney , and Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hundt, Marianne , and Christian Mair
    1999 “‘Agile’ and ‘Uptight’ Genres: The Corpus-based Approach to Language Change in Progress”. The International Journal of Corpus Linguistics4: 221–242. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
  15. Leech, Geoffrey
    2004 “Recent Grammatical Change in English: Data, Description, Theory”. In Karin Aijmer , and Bengt Altenberg , eds.Advances in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 61–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Leech, Geoffrey , Marianne Hundt , Christian Mair , and Nicholas Smith
    2009Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mair, Christian
    1997 “Parallel Corpora: A Real-Time Approach to the Study of Language Change in Progress”. In Magnus Ljung , ed.Corpus-based Studies in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 195–209.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2006Twentieth-Century English. History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486951
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486951 [Google Scholar]
  19. Mair, Christian , and Marianne Hundt
    1995 “Why Is the Progressive Becoming more Frequent in English? A Corpus-based Investigation of Language Change in Progress”. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik43: 111–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pullum, Geoffrey K.
    2014 “Fear and Loathing of the English Passive”. Language and Communication37: 60–74. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.08.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech , and Jan Svartvik
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schwarz, Sarah
    2015 “Passive Voice in American Soap Opera Dialogue”. Studia Neophilologica87: 152–170. doi: 10.1080/00393274.2015.1049831
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2015.1049831 [Google Scholar]
  23. Siemund, Rainer
    1995 “‘For Who the Bell Tolls’: Or Why Corpus Linguistics Should Carry the Bell in the Study of Language Change in Present-Day English”. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik20: 351–376.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith, Nicholas , and Paul Rayson
    2007 “Recent Change and Variation in the British English Use of the Progressive Passive”. ICAME Journal31: 129–159.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Smitterberg, Erik
    2008 “ The Progressive and Phrasal Verbs: Evidence of Colloquialization in Nineteenth-century English? ”. In Terttu Nevalainen , Irma Taavitsainen , Päivi Pahta , and Minna Korhonen , eds.The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 269–289. doi: 10.1075/silv.2.21smi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.2.21smi [Google Scholar]
  26. Strunk Jr., William , and Elwyn B. White
    1979The Elements of Style (3th ed.). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 “Verbs and Times”. The Philosophical Review66: 143–160. doi: 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/eww.38.3.03sch
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/eww.38.3.03sch
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): American English , be-passive , get-passive , grammaticalization and situation type
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error