1887
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

In praise of text analysis, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fol.00014.asp-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.00014.asp
2019-05-27
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asp, Elissa & Jessica deVilliers
    2010When language breaks down: Analysing discourse in clinical contexts. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511845352
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845352 [Google Scholar]
  2. . In press. Clinical Linguistics. InWendy Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal eds. The Cambridge handbook of Systemic-Functional linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316337936.025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.025 [Google Scholar]
  3. Berry, Margaret
    1981a Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. InMalcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  4. 2013 Towards a study of the differences between formal written English and informal spoken English. InLisa Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice, 365–383. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.022 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2016 On describing contexts of situation. InWendy Bowcher & Jennifer Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 184–205. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9781137402868_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bloor, Meriel & Thomas Bloor
    2007The practice of critical discourse analysis: An introduction. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coulthard, Malcolm & Alison Johnson
    (eds.) 2010The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203855607
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607 [Google Scholar]
  8. deVilliers, Jessica & Robert Stainton
    (eds.) 2001 Communication in linguistics. Vol.1. Papers in Honour ofMichael Gregory. Toronto: Éditions du Gref.
  9. (eds.) 2009 Communication in Linguistics. Vol.2. Michael Gregory’s proposals for a communication linguistics. Toronto: Éditions du Gref.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Green, Clarence
    2014 On the relationship between clause combination, grammatical hierarchy and discourse-pragmatic coherence. Functions of Language21(3). 297–332. 10.1075/fol.21.3.02gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.3.02gre [Google Scholar]
  11. Gregory, Michael
    1988 Generic situation and register: A functional view of communication. InJames D. Benson, Michael J. Cummings & William S. Greaves (eds.), Linguistics in a systemic perspective, 301–329. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.39.12gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.39.12gre [Google Scholar]
  12. 1986/1995 Generic expectancies and discoursal surprises: John Donne’s The Good Morrow. InPeter H. Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic-functional perspectives, 67–84. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1984a/2002 Phasal analysis with communication linguistics: Two contrastive discourses. InPeter H. Fries, Michael J. Cummings, David Lockwood & William Spruiell (eds.), Relations and functions within and around language, 316–345. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1971 Linguistic function and literary style: An enquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. InSeymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2001 Is the grammar neutral? Is the grammarian neutral?IndeVilliers & Stainton 2001, 179–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Malcolm, Karen
    2010Phasal analysis: Analysing discourse through communication linguistics. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Martin, J. R. & David Rose
    2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller, Donna R. & Monica Turci
    (eds.) 2010Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to the study of literature. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Shklovsky, Viktor
    1925 Art as Technique. InAlexandra Berlina 2017, Victor Shklovsky: A reader. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.00014.asp
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error