References

1. Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Alex Black, Nicole Chovil & Jennifer Mullett
   1990 Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Berry, Margaret
   2014 Changes in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Past developments, ongoing developments (and future developments?). Paper presented at the25th European Systemic Functional Congress, Paris, 9–12 July 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berry, Margaret, Geoff Thompson & Hilary Hillier
   2014 Theme and variations. InMaría de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Francisco Gonzálvez García (eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space (Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68), 107–126. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, Doug
   1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, Doug, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
   1999 The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bull, Peter & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
   2014 Equivocation and doublespeak in far right-wing discourse: An analysis of Nick Griffin’s performance on BBC’s Question Time. Text & Talk34(1). 1–22. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0035
   https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0035 [Google Scholar]
7. Bull, Peter & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
   . in press. Conflict in political discourse. InLesley Jeffreys & Jim O’Driscoll eds. The Routledge handbook of language and conflict. Oxford: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429058011‑14
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058011-14 [Google Scholar]
8. Butler, Christopher S.
   2004a Multi-word sequences and their relevance for recent models of Functional Grammar. Functions of Language10(2). 179–208. 10.1075/fol.10.2.03but
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.2.03but [Google Scholar]
9. Butler, Christopher S.
   2004b Corpus studies and functional linguistic theories. Functions of Language11(2). 147–186. 10.1075/fol.11.2.02but
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.11.2.02but [Google Scholar]
10. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1971 Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. InSeymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin
    1993 Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Labov, William
    1981 What can be learned about change in progress from synchronic description?InDavid Sankoff & Henrietta Cedergren (eds.), Variation Omnibus. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Martin, J. R. & Robert Veel
    (eds.) 1998 Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
    2008 “Those are only slogans”: A linguistic analysis of argumentation in debates with extremist political speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology27(4). 345–358. 10.1177/0261927X08322476
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322476 [Google Scholar]
15. Sinclair, John McH
    1992 Trust the text: The implications are daunting. InMartin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 5–19. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Stubbs, Michael
    1995 Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language2(1). 23–55. 10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu [Google Scholar]
17. Thompson, Geoff
    2003 The elided participant: Presenting an uncommonsense view of the researcher’s role. InAnne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Miriam Taverniers & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics, 257–278. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.236.14tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.236.14tho [Google Scholar]
18. Webster, Jonathan J.
    (ed.) 2002 Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. Volume2in the Collected Works ofM. A. K. Halliday. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]