1887
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Do we need more of the same?, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fol.00016.sim-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.00016.sim
2019-05-27
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Alex Black, Nicole Chovil & Jennifer Mullett
    1990Equivocal Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berry, Margaret
    2014 Changes in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Past developments, ongoing developments (and future developments?). Paper presented at the25th European Systemic Functional Congress, Paris, 9–12 July 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berry, Margaret, Geoff Thompson & Hilary Hillier
    2014 Theme and variations. InMaría de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Francisco Gonzálvez García (eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space (Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 68), 107–126. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, Doug
    1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Doug, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
    1999The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bull, Peter & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
    2014 Equivocation and doublespeak in far right-wing discourse: An analysis of Nick Griffin’s performance on BBC’s Question Time. Text & Talk34(1). 1–22. 10.1515/text‑2013‑0035
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0035 [Google Scholar]
  7. . in press. Conflict in political discourse. InLesley Jeffreys & Jim O’Driscoll eds. The Routledge handbook of language and conflict. Oxford: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429058011‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058011-14 [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, Christopher S.
    2004a Multi-word sequences and their relevance for recent models of Functional Grammar. Functions of Language10(2). 179–208. 10.1075/fol.10.2.03but
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.2.03but [Google Scholar]
  9. 2004b Corpus studies and functional linguistic theories. Functions of Language11(2). 147–186. 10.1075/fol.11.2.02but
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.11.2.02but [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1971 Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors. InSeymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin
    1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Labov, William
    1981 What can be learned about change in progress from synchronic description?InDavid Sankoff & Henrietta Cedergren (eds.), Variation Omnibus. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Martin, J. R. & Robert Veel
    (eds.) 1998Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
    2008 “Those are only slogans”: A linguistic analysis of argumentation in debates with extremist political speakers. Journal of Language and Social Psychology27(4). 345–358. 10.1177/0261927X08322476
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322476 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sinclair, John McH
    1992 Trust the text: The implications are daunting. InMartin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 5–19. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Stubbs, Michael
    1995 Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language2(1). 23–55. 10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu [Google Scholar]
  17. Thompson, Geoff
    2003 The elided participant: Presenting an uncommonsense view of the researcher’s role. InAnne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Miriam Taverniers & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Grammatical metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics, 257–278. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.236.14tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.236.14tho [Google Scholar]
  18. Webster, Jonathan J.
    (ed.) 2002Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. Volume2in the Collected Works ofM. A. K. Halliday. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.00016.sim
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error