1887
Volume 26, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reviews The dynamics of political discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups

 
9789027256645

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.00023.ton
2019-11-25
2020-04-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Athanasiadou, Angeliki & Herbert L. Colston
    (eds.) 2017Irony in language use and communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlin, Lawrence N.
    2007 Cooperative conflict and evasive language: The case of the 9/11 commission hearings.” InAnita Fetzer (ed.), Context and appropriateness: Micro meets macro, 176–215. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.162.10ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.162.10ber [Google Scholar]
  3. 2011 Fighting words: Hybrid discourse and discourse processes. InAnita Fetzer & Etsuko Oishi (eds.), Context and contexts, 41–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.209.04ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.209.04ber [Google Scholar]
  4. Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach
    (eds.) 2011Understanding quotation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110240085
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dynel, Marta
    2018Irony, deception and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781501507922
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507922 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gu, Yueguo
    2010 The activity type as interface between language and parole, and between individual and society: An argument for trichotomy in pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society1(1). 74–101. doi:  10.1075/ps.1.1.05gu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.1.1.05gu [Google Scholar]
  7. Harré, Rom & Luk Van Langenhove
    1999Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Katriel, Tamar
    1986Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli Sabra culture. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nuolijärvi, Pirkko & Liisa Tiittulab
    2011 Irony in political television debates. Journal of Pragmatics43(2). 572–587. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.019 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor & Maria Belén Alvarado Ortega
    (eds.) 2013Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.231
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.231 [Google Scholar]
  11. Saka, Paul & Michael Johnson
    (eds.) 2017The semantics and pragmatics of quotation. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑68747‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68747-6 [Google Scholar]
  12. Searle, John R.
    1992 Conversation revisited. InJohn R. Searle, Hermann Parret & Jef Verschueren (eds.), (On) Searle on conversation, 137–147. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.21.09sea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.21.09sea [Google Scholar]
  13. Yus, Francisco
    2016 Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition23(1). 92–116. 10.1075/pc.23.1.05yus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.05yus [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.00023.ton
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error