Volume 29, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper offers a qualitative and quantitative analysis of French and Italian questions based on spontaneous spoken data. A pragmatic analysis relying on two parameters, propositional activation and pragmatic functions, reveals that the licensing conditions and the use of this structure largely differ in the two languages. While French do not require an activated proposition and can introduce a discourse-new topic, Italian mostly require an activated proposition and, at least in the analyzed corpus data, do not introduce discourse-new topics. An examination of the context also reveals that the different licensing conditions influence the interactional uses of these questions. All in all, both French and Italian require a pragmatic condition, which is their ‘anchoring’ to given, or at least inferable, information in the linguistic context (as is typical of Italian) or to predictable situations in the extralinguistic context (such as expected discourse moves in social interactions, as is the case for French).


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adli, Aria
    2006 French wh-in-situ questions and syntactic optionality: Evidence from three data types. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft25. 163–203. 10.1515/ZFS.2006.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ZFS.2006.007 [Google Scholar]
  2. Badan, Linda & Claudia Crocco
    2019 Focus in Italian echo wh-questions: An analysis at syntax-prosody interface. Probus31(1). 29–73. 10.1515/probus‑2017‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2017-0011 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2021 Italian wh- questions and the low periphery. Linguistics59(3). 757–784. 10.1515/ling‑2021‑0059
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0059 [Google Scholar]
  4. Badan, Linda , Stella Gryllia & Gaetano Fiorin
    2017 Italian echo-questions at the interface. Studia Linguistica71(3). 207–240. 10.1111/stul.12048
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12048 [Google Scholar]
  5. Béguelin, Marie-José , Aidan Coveney & Alexander Guryev
    (eds.) 2018L’interrogative en français. Bern: Peter Lang. 10.3726/b13079
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b13079 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biezma, Maria
    2018 Givenness and the difference between wh-fronted and wh-in-situ questions in Spanish. In Janine Berns , Heike Jacobs & Dominique Nouveau (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 13. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen, 21–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/rllt.13.03bie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.03bie [Google Scholar]
  7. Bolinger, Dwight
    1978 Asking more than one thing at a time. In Herny Hiż (ed.), Questions, 107–150. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9509‑3_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonan, Caterina
    2021Romance interrogative syntax. Formal and typological dimensions of variation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.266
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.266 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boucher, Paul
    2010Wh-questions in French and English. Mapping syntax to information structure. In Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds.), Comparative and contrastive studies of information structure, 101–137. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.165.05bou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.165.05bou [Google Scholar]
  10. Büring, Daniel
    2016 (Contrastive) Topics. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), 64–85. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1994Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: UCP.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Johan Rooryck
    2000 Licensing wh-in-situ . Syntax3. 1–19. 10.1111/1467‑9612.00022
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00022 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chernova, Ekaterina
    2015The Syntax of wh-movement in multiple (true and echo) questions: A Q-particle approach. Girona: Universitat de Girona PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark, Herbert H.
    1996Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  15. Comrie, Bernard , Martin Haspelmath & Balthasar Bickel
    2015Leipzig glossing rules. Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/pdf/Glossing-Rules.pdf (Last access: 05.06.2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Coveney, Aidan
    1996Variability in spoken French. A sociolinguistic study of interrogation and negation. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2020 L’interrogation directe. InEncyclopédie grammaticale du français. www.encyclogram.fr/notx/002/002_Notice.php (Last access: 05.06.2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
    2005C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.15 [Google Scholar]
  19. De Santis, Cristiana
    2010 Aggettivi e pronomi interrogativi. In Raffaele Simone (ed.), Enciclopedia dell’italiano, vol.I (A-L), 684–686. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana G. Treccani.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Donzelli, Giulia & Diego Pescarini
    2019 Tre tipi di wh in situ nei dialetti lombardi. In Annamaria Chilà & Alessandro De Angelis (eds.), Bollettino del Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani21. 183–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dryer, Matthew S.
    1996 Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics26(4). 475–523. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00059‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00059-3 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013 Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/chapter/93 (Last access: 05.06.2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dufter, Andreas & Elisabeth Stark
    (eds.) 2017Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110377088
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088 [Google Scholar]
  24. Engdahl, Elisabeth
    2006 Information packaging in questions. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, 93–111. Paris: CSSP.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Féry, Caroline & Shinichiro Ishihara
    (eds.) 2016The Oxford handbook of information structure. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Frascarelli, Mara
    2017 Dislocations and framings. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), 472–501. 10.1515/9783110377088‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-013 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaiser, Georg & Stefano Quaglia
    2015 In search of wh-in-situ in Romance: An investigation in detective stories. In Ellen Brandner , Anna Czypionka , Constantin Freitag & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), Charting the landscape of linguistics, 92–103. Konstanz: Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System. https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/34161 (Last access: 05.06.2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kellert, Olga
    2017 Interrogatives. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), 569–602. 10.1515/9783110377088‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377088-016 [Google Scholar]
  29. Koshik, Irene
    2003 Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies5(1). 51–77. 10.1177/14614456030050010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
  30. Krifka, Manfred & Renate Musan
    2012 Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.), The expression of information structure, 1–43. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110261608.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261608.1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hamlaoui, Fatima
    2011 On the role of phonology and discourse in Francilian French wh-questions. Journal of Linguistics47(1). 129–162. 10.1017/S0022226710000198
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000198 [Google Scholar]
  32. Larrivée, Pierre
    2016 The pragmatics of marked configurations: Negative doubling in French. Journal of Pragmatics95. 34–49. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2019 Historical pragmatics, explicit activation and wh in situ in French. In Ingo Feldhausen , Martin Elsig , Imme Kuchenbrandt & Mareike Neuhaus (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 15. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 30, Frankfurt, 114–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/rllt.15.06lar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.15.06lar [Google Scholar]
  34. Lefeuvre, Florence & Nathalie Rossi-Gensane
    2015 Interrogation. In Pierre Larrivée & Florence Lefeuvre (eds.), Projet Fracov. www.univ-paris3.fr/index-des-fiches-227311.kjsp?RH=1373703153287 (Last access: 05.06.2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Levshina, Natalia
    2015How to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mathieu, Éric
    2009 Les questions en français: Micro et macro-variation. In France Martineau , Raymond Mougeon , Terry Nadasdi & Mireille Tremblay (eds.), Le français d’ici: études linguistiques et sociolinguistiques de la variation, 37–66. Toronto: GREF.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Myers, Lindsy Lee
    2007WH-interrogatives in spoken French: A corpus-based analysis of their form and function. Austin: University of Texas Austin PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Oushiro, Livia
    2011 Wh-interrogatives in Brazilian Portuguese: The influence of common ground. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics17 (2). 145–154.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pires, Acrisio & Heather Taylor
    2009 The syntax of wh-in-situ and common ground. CLS43 (2). 201–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2021A language and environment for statistical computing, v4.1.0. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/ (Last access: 05.06.2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Riester, Arndt , Lisa Brunetti & Kordula De Kuthy
    2018 Annotation guidelines for Questions Under Discussion and information structure. In Evangelia Adamou , Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Information structure in lesser-described languages. Studies in prosody and syntax, 403–444. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.199.14rie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.199.14rie [Google Scholar]
  42. Roberts, Craige
    2012 [1996] Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics & Pragmatics5. 1–69. 10.3765/sp.5.6
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.5.6 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2018 The pragmatics of Spanish postposed wh-interrogatives. Folia Linguistica, 52(2). 283–317. 10.1515/flin‑2018‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2019 Brazilian Portuguese in-situ wh-interrogatives between rhetoric and change. Glossa4(1). 1–29. 10.5334/gjgl.900
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.900 [Google Scholar]
  45. . This issue. Modeling the discourse pragmatics of interrogatives. Functions of Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rossi-Gensane, Nathalie & Biagio Ursi
    2020 Syntaxe et genre interactionnel : le cas des interrogatives directes partielles dans les interactions commerciales. Langages219(3). 147–160. 10.3917/lang.219.0147
    https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.219.0147 [Google Scholar]
  47. Spina, Stefania
    2014 Perugia Corpus: una risorsa di riferimento per l’italiano. Composizione, annotazione e valutazione. In Roberto Basili , Alessandro Lenci & Bernardo Magnini (eds.), Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it, vol.1, 354–359. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Velleman, Leah & David Beaver
    2016 Question-based models of information structure. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), 86–107. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.29
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.013.29 [Google Scholar]
  49. Wallage, Phillip
    2015 Identifying the role of pragmatic activation in changes to the expression of English negation. In Pierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives, 199–227. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Zimmermann, Michael & Katharina Kaiser
    2019 Refining current insights into the wh-in-situ interrogative construction in French: The case of Contemporary Hexagonal French. Romanistisches Jahrbuch70(1). 123–157. 10.1515/roja‑2019‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/roja-2019-0005 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error