Modeling the discourse pragmatics of interrogatives

References

1. Boyd, Elisabeth & John Heritage
   2006 Taking the patient’s medical history: Questioning during comprehensive history taking. InJohn Heritage & Douglas Maynard (eds.), Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients, 151–184. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.008
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172.008 [Google Scholar]
2. Caponigro, Ivano & Jon Sprouse
   2007 Rhetorical questions as questions. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung11 (2007) 121–133.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chomsky, Noam
   1977 On wh-movement. InPeter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Clark, Herbert H.
   1996 Using language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
5. Clark, Herbert H. & Edward F. Schaefer
   1989 Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science13. 259–294. Available online atwww-psych.stanford.edu/~herb/1980s/Clark.Schaefer.89.pdf (last access21 November 2019).
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clayman, Steven E. & John Heritage
   2002 Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication52(4). 749–775. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02572.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02572.x [Google Scholar]
7. Cole, Pieter & Gabriella Hermon
   1994 Is there LF Wh-movement?Linguistic Inquiry25. 239–262.   10.2307/4178860
   https://doi.org/10.2307/4178860 [Google Scholar]
8. Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia
   2005 C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DuBois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra A. Thompson & Nii Martey
   2000 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, PartOne. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. Available online atwww.linguistics.ucsb.edu/research/santa-barbara-corpus (last access21 November 2019).
10. DuBois, John W., Wallace L. Chafe, Charles Meyer, Sandra A. Thompson & Nii Martey
    2003 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, PartTwo. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. Available online atwww.linguistics.ucsb.edu/research/santa-barbara-corpus (last access21 November 2019).
11. DuBois, John W. & Robert Englebretson
    2004 Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, PartThree. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. Available online atwww.linguistics.ucsb.edu/research/santa-barbara-corpus (last access21 November 2019).
12. Ehmer, Oliver & Malte Rosemeyer
    2018 When “questions” are not questions: Inferences and conventionalization in Spanish but-prefaced partial interrogatives. Open Linguistics4. 70–100. 10.1515/opli‑2018‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0005 [Google Scholar]
13. Enfield, Nicholas J., Penelope Brown & Jan P. De Ruiter
    2012 Epistemic dimensions of polar questions: Sentence-final particles in comparative perspective. InJan De Ruiter (ed.), Questions, 193–221. West Nyack, NY: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139045414.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139045414.014 [Google Scholar]
14. Engdahl, Elisabeth
    2006 Information packaging in questions. InOlivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 6, 93–111. Paris: CSSP.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hamblin, Charles L.
    1973 Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language10. 41–53.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2001 Syntax in interaction: Form and function of yes/no interrogatives in spoken standard French. Studies in Language25(3). 463–520. 10.1075/sl.25.3.04mos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.3.04mos [Google Scholar]
17. Hayano, Kaoru
    2013 Question design in conversation. InJack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 395–414. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, John
    2002 The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics34(10–11). 1427–1446.   10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00072‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3 [Google Scholar]
19. Heritage, John
    2003 Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview. InPhillip Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron & Jenny Mandelbaum (eds.), Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper, 57–90. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Heritage, John
    2010 Questioning in medicine. InAlice Freed & Susan Ehrlich (eds.), “Why do you ask?”: The function of questions in institutional discourse, 42–68. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Heritage, John
    2012a The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1). 30–52.   10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
22. Heritage, John
    2012b Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction45(1). 1–19.   10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
23. Heritage, John C. & Steven Clayman
    2010 Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
24. Heritage, John C. & Andrew L. Roth
    1995 Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction28(1). 1–60.   10.1207/s15327973rlsi2801_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2801_1 [Google Scholar]
25. Jacob, Daniel
    2019 Overt questions: A repair strategy?Talk presented at theworkshop Discourse-pragmatic perspectives on Romance interrogatives and elsewhere, Freiburg, July 16, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Koshik, Irene
    2003 Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies5. 51–77. 10.1177/14614456030050010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
27. Onea, Edgar & Malte Zimmermann
    2019 Questions in discourse: An overview. InKlaus von Heusinger, Edgar Onea & Malte Zimmermann (eds.), Questions in discourse. Volume 1: Semantics, 5–117. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Perlmutter, David M.
    1968 Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Pires, Acrisio & Heather L. Taylor
    2007 The syntax of wh-in-situ and common ground. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society43(2). 201–215.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Raso, Tommaso & Heliana Mello
    2012 The C-ORAL BRASIL I: Reference corpus for informal spoken Brazilian Portuguese. InHelena Caseli, Aline Villavicencio, António Teixeira & Fernando Perdigão (eds.), Computational processing of the Portuguese language, 362–367. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑28885‑2_40
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28885-2_40 [Google Scholar]
31. Riester, Arndt, Lisa Brunetti & Kordula De Kuthy
    2018 Annotation guidelines for Question under Discussion and information structure. InEvangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Information structure in lesser-described languages: Studies in prosody and syntax, 403–443. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.199.14rie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.199.14rie [Google Scholar]
32. Roberts, Craige
    1996 Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. InJae Haak Yoon & Andreas Kathol (eds.), OSUWPL Volume 49: Papers in semantics, 91–136. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Roberts, Craige
    2004 Context in dynamic interpretation. InLaurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 197–220. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2018 The pragmatics of Spanish postposed-wh-interrogatives. Folia Linguistica52(2). 283–317. 10.1515/flin‑2018‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
35. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2019 Brazilian Portuguese in-situ wh-interrogatives between rhetoric and change. Glossa4(1). 1–29. 10.5334/gjgl.900
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.900 [Google Scholar]
36. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2021 Two types of constructionalization processes in Spanish and Portuguese clefted wh-interrogatives. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics14(1). 117–160. 10.1515/shll‑2021‑2042
    https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2021-2042 [Google Scholar]
37. Ross, John R.
    1967 Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Roter, Debra & Judith Hall
    2006 Doctors talking with patients / Patients talking with doctors: Improving communication in medical visits, 2nd edn.Westport, CT: Praeger.   10.1111/j.1444‑0938
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938 [Google Scholar]
39. Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Arnulf Deppermann, Peter Gilles, Susanne Günthner, Martin Hartung, Friederike Kern, Christine Mertzlufft, Christian Meyer, Miriam Morek, Frank Oberzaucher, Jörg Peters, Uta Quasthoff, Wilfried Schütte, Anja Stukenbrock & Susanne Uhmann
    2011 A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion12. 1–51.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Harvey Sacks
    1973 Opening up closings. Semiotica8. 289–327.   10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
41. Stalnaker, Robert
    1973 Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic2. 447–457. 10.1007/BF00262951
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262951 [Google Scholar]
42. Stalnaker, Robert
    2002 Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy25. 701–721. 10.1023/A:1020867916902
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 [Google Scholar]
43. Stivers, Tanya, Nicholas J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson
    (eds.) 2010 Question-response sequences in conversation across ten languages. Special issue ofJournal of Pragmatics, 42(10). 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.002 [Google Scholar]
44. Zahn, Christopher J.
    1984 A reexamination of conversational repair. Communication Monographs51(1). 56–66.   10.1080/03637758409390183
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390183 [Google Scholar]