Review of Huang (2022): Toward multimodal pragmatics: A Study of illocutionary force in Chinese situated discourse

References

1. Kurzon, Dennis
   1998 The speech act status of incitement: perlocutionary acts revisited. Journal of Pragmatics29(5). 571–596. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)00083‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00083-0 [Google Scholar]
2. Li, Xiaoting
   2014 Multimodality, interaction and turn-taking in Mandarin conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scld.3
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.3 [Google Scholar]
3. Mabaquiao, Napoleon M. Jr.
   2018 Speech act theory: From Austin to Searle. A Journal for Humanities, Social Sciences, Business, and Education191. 35–45.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Norris, Sigrid
   2011 Three hierarchical positions of deictic gesture in relation to spoken language: A multimodal interaction analysis. Visual Communication10(2). 129–147. 10.1177/1470357211398439
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357211398439 [Google Scholar]
5. Norris, Sigrid
   2019 Systematically working with multimodal data: Research methods in multimodal discourse analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119168355
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119168355 [Google Scholar]
6. Norris, Sigrid
   2020 Multimodal theory and methodology: For the analysis of inter(action) and identity. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429351600
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351600 [Google Scholar]
7. Sierra, Sylvia
   2017 “Buffy sings to Cody”: A multimodal analysis of mother and pre-lingual-infant question–response sequences. Journal of Pragmatics1101. 50–62. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.005 [Google Scholar]
8. Turk, Matthew
   2014 Multimodal interaction: A review. Pattern Recognition Letters361. 189–195. 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.07.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]