Volume 25, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper examines the phenomenon of paratactic negation (PN) by analyzing the usage of the Finnish verb (‘doubt’, ‘suspect’, ‘suppose’), which is associated with both inherent negation and negative evaluation. Paratactic negation refers to an overt negation in a complement clause of an inherently negative verb that results in a single negative reading. This analysis draws on previous research going back to Jespersen (1917), in observing that the PN complement clause verbalizes the content of the activity that is expressed by the matrix verb. In this case, the verb of inherent negation does not have scope over the complement despite its negative semantics. This paper addresses the question of where and why content complements actually occur. The answer to this question is given by accounting for the differences of the content complements from more clearly subordinate target complements. It is shown that this distinction is related to verb semantics and conventionalized syntagmatic patterns. This is demonstrated by accounting for the differences of the content complements from more clearly subordinate target complements. On the basis of these results, the paper offers a refined definition of paratactic negation. This definition has two major implications: First, it suggests that a semantically non-vacuous PN may be a conventionalized pattern. Second, it leads us to reconsider the limits of PN and the definition of inherent negation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Allwood, Jens , Lars-Gunnar Andersson & Östen Dahl
    1977Logic in linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511621017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621017 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1933Language. New York, NY: Henry Holt & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, Joan
    2010Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chafe, Wallace
    1988 Linking intonation units in spoken English. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 1–27. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.18.03cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.03cha [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, William
    2000Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
    2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cruse, D. Alan
    1977 Antonyms and gradable complementaries. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Perspektiven der lexikalischen Semantik. Beiträge zum Wuppertaler Semantikkolloquium vom 2–3 Dezember 1977, 14–25. Bonn: Bouvier.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cuypere, Ludovic de , Johan van der Auwera & Klaas Willems
    2007 Double negation and iconicity. In Elżbieta Tabakowsa , Christina Ljungberg & Olga Fisher (eds.), Insistent Images, 301–320. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/ill.5.25cuy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.5.25cuy [Google Scholar]
  9. Denison, David
    1999 Syntax. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language IV 1776–1997, 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Espinal, Maria Teresa
    2000 Expletive negation, negative concord and feature checking. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics8. 47–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Givón, Talmy
    1978 Negation in language: Pragmatics, function, ontology. In Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 9: Pragmatics, 69–112. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2001Syntax: An introduction. Vol.2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hakulinen, Auli & Fred Karlsson
    1979Nykysuomen lauseoppia. [Syntax of Modern Finnish.] Helsinki: SKS.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hakulinen, Auli , Maria Vilkuna , Riitta Korhonen , Vesa Koivisto , Tarja-Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho
    2004Iso suomen kielioppi [A comprehensive Finnish grammar]. Helsinki: SKS.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Haiman, John & Sandra A. Thompson
    1988 Introduction. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (Typological Studies in Language 18), ix–xiii. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.18.02hai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.02hai [Google Scholar]
  16. Herlin, Ilona , Jyrki Kalliokoski & Laura Visapää
    2014 Introduction. In Laura Visapää , Jyrki Kalliokoski & Helena Sorva (eds.), Contexts of subordination, 1–16. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Horn, Laurence R.
    1978 Some aspects of negation. In Joseph Greenberg , Charles Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, 127–210. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1989A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2010a Multiple negation in English and other languages. In Laurence R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 111–148. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110219302.111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219302.111 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2010b Introduction. In Laurence R. Horn (ed.), The expression of negation, 1–7. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110219302.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219302.1 [Google Scholar]
  21. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  22. Iyeiri, Yoko
    2009 The historical development of the verb doubt and its various patterns of complementation. In Ute Römer & Rainer Schultze (eds.), Exploring the lexis-grammar interface, 153–169. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.35.11iye
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.35.11iye [Google Scholar]
  23. 2010Verbs of implicit negation and their complements in the history of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.155
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.155 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jespersen, Otto
    1917Negation in English and other languages. Historisk-filologiske meddelelser / Det Kongelige Danske videnskaberners selskab; 1, 5. København: Andr. Fred. Høst & søn.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1924The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KS
    KS = Kielitoimiston sanakirja. [The new dictionary of Modern Finnish.] Available online atwww.kielitoimistonsanakirja.fi/.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Larjavaara, Matti
    1992 Etteikö kelpaa? [As if it won’t (etteikö) do?] Virittäjä96. 119–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2007Pragmasemantiikka. [Pragma-sematics.] Helsinki: SKS.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Laury, Ritva
    2006 On subordination, Finnish-Style: Questioning the category of finite clausal complements in spoken Finnish. In Mickael Suominen , Antti Arppe , Anu Airola , Orvokki Heinämäki , Matti Miestamo , Urho Määttä , Jussi Niemi , Kari K. Pitkänen & Kaius Sinnemäki (eds.), A man of measure: Festschrift in honour of Fred Karlsson on his 60th birthday. SKY Journal of Linguistics. Special Supplement19. 310–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Laury, Ritva & Eeva-Leena Seppänen
    2008 Clause combining, interaction, evidentiality, participation structure, and the conjunction-particle continuum. The Finnish että. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies in clause combining. The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 153–178. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.80.08lau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.80.08lau [Google Scholar]
  32. Leino, Jaakko
    1999 Selvää on se, että [‘It is clear that’]. Kielikello3/1999 20–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Meibauer, Jörg
    1990 Sentence mood, lexical category filling, and non-propositional nicht in German. Linguistische Berichte130. 441–463.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Miestamo, Matti
    2005Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2011 A typological perspective on negation in Finnish dialects. Nordic Journal of Linguistics34(2). 83–104.10.1017/S0332586511000126
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586511000126 [Google Scholar]
  36. Pajunen, Anneli
    2001Argumenttirakenne. Asiaintilojen luokitus ja verbien käyttäytyminen suomen kielessä. [Argument structure. The classification of state of affairs, and the behavior of verbs in Finnish.] Helsinki: SKS.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Salminen, Jutta
    2015 From doubt to supposition: The construction-specific meaning change of the Finnish verb epäillä. In Juhani Rudanko , Jukka Havu , Mikko Höglund & Paul Rickman (eds.), Perspectives on complementation. Structure, variation, and boundaries, 157–176. London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Saury, Jean-Michel
    2004The phenomenology of negation and its expression in natural language. Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 27. Department of Linguistics. Göteborg University.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2008 The phenomenology of negation. Phenom Cogn Sci (2009) 8. 245–260.10.1007/s11097‑008‑9113‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9113-3 [Google Scholar]
  40. Seppänen, Eeva-Leena & Ritva Laury
    2007 Complement clauses as turn continuations: The Finnish et(tä)-clause. Pragmatics17:4. 553–572.10.1075/prag.17.4.06sep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.17.4.06sep [Google Scholar]
  41. Smyth, Herbert Weir
    1956 [1920]Greek grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schneider, Stefan , Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi
    2015 Introduction. In Stefan Schneider , Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi (eds.), Parenthetical verbs, 1–12. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. SSA
    SSA = Suomen sanojen alkuperä: etymologinen sanakirja 1: A–K. [The origin of Finnish words: etymological dictionary] 1992 Helsinki: SKS.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Thompson, Sandra A.
    2002 “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language26. 125–164.10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho [Google Scholar]
  45. Tommola, Hannu
    2015 Conversation ‘fear + neg’ in LingTyp mailing list on20 March 2015: listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/lingtyp/2015-March/thread.html
  46. Tottie, Gunnel
    1991Negation in English speech and writing: A study in variation. (Quantitative analyses of linguistic structure 4). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tovena, Lucia M.
    1996 An expletive negation which is not so redundant. In Karen Zagona (ed.), Grammatical theory and Romance languages: Selected papers from the 25th linguistic symposium on Romance languages (LSRL XXV), 263–274. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.133.21tov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.133.21tov [Google Scholar]
  48. Tuppurainen, Hanna
    1991Kieltojen merkitys ja käyttö keskustelussa. [The meaning and use of negations in conversation.] Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Verhagen, Arie
    2005Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vilkuna, Maria
    2015 Negation in Finnish. In Matti Miestamo , Anne Tamm & Beata Wagner-Nagy (eds.), Negation in Uralic languages (Typological Studies in Language 108), 457–486. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.108.17vil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.108.17vil [Google Scholar]
  51. Vries, Mark de
    2007 Invisible constituents? Parentheticals as B-merged adverbial phrases. In Nicole Dehé & Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 203–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.106.11vri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.106.11vri [Google Scholar]
  52. Wouden, Ton van der
    1997Negative contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wurff, Wim van der
    1998 On expletive negation with adversative predicates in the history of English. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade , Gunnel Tottie & Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Negation in the history of English, 295–328. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Yoon, Suwon
    2011‘Not’ in the mood: The syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of evaluative negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2013 Parametric variation in subordinate evaluative negation: Korean/Japanese versus others. Journal of East Asian Linguistics22. 133–166.10.1007/s10831‑012‑9100‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-012-9100-0 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error