A diachronic corpus study of prenominal zo’n ‘so a’ in Dutch

References

1. Auwera, Johan van der & Evie Coussé
   2016 Such and sådan – the same but different. Nordic Journal of English Studies15(3). 15–32. 10.35360/njes.374
   https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.374 [Google Scholar]
2. Auwera, Johan van der & Kalyanamalini Sahoo
   2015 On comparative concepts and descriptive categories, such as they are. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia47(2). 136–173. 10.1080/03740463.2015.1115636
   https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2015.1115636 [Google Scholar]
3. Bolinger, Dwight
   1972 Degree words. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110877786
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786 [Google Scholar]
4. Breban, Tine
   2010 English adjectives of comparison: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110216011
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216011 [Google Scholar]
5. Brems, Lieselotte
   2011 Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110252927
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252927 [Google Scholar]
6. Carlier, Anne & Walter De Mulder
   2010 The emergence of the definite article: ille in competition with ipse in Late Latin. InKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), 241–275.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö
   2000 Data in historical pragmatics: spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1(2). 175–199. 10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.03cul [Google Scholar]
8. Davidse, Kristin, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens
   (eds) 2010 Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226102
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102 [Google Scholar]
9. Demske, Ulrike
   2005 Weshalb Demonstrativpronomina nich immer Determinantien sind [Why demonstrative pronouns are not always determiners]. InFranz Josef D’Avis (ed.), Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie [German syntax: Empiricism and theory], 53–80. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Diessel, Holger
    2006 Demonstratives, joint attention and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics17(4). 463–489. 10.1515/COG.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
11. Ekberg, Lena
    2010 Extended uses of sån (’such’) among adolescents in multilingual Malmö. InRoger Källström & Inger Lindberg (eds.), Young urban Swedish: Variation and change in multilingual settings, 49–65. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ekberg, Lena
    2011 Joint attention and cooperation in the Swedish of adolescents in multilingual settings. InFriederike Kern & Margret Selting (eds.), Ethnic styles of speaking in European metropolitan areas, 217–237. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/silv.8.09ekb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.8.09ekb [Google Scholar]
13. Ghesquière, Lobke
    2009 From determining to emphasizing meanings: the adjectives of specificity. Folia Linguistica43(2). 311–343. 10.1515/FLIN.2009.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/FLIN.2009.009 [Google Scholar]
14. Ghesquière, Lobke
    2012 Identifying and intensifying uses of prenominal such: A data-based approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17(4). 516–545. 10.1075/ijcl.17.4.03ghe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.4.03ghe [Google Scholar]
15. Ghesquière, Lobke, Lieselotte Brems & Freek Van de Velde
    2012 Intersubjectivty and intersubjectification: Typology and operationalization. English Text Construction5(1). 128–152. 10.1075/etc.5.1.07ghe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.07ghe [Google Scholar]
16. Ghesquière, Lobke & Freek Van de Velde
    2011 A corpus-based account of the development of English such and Dutch zulk: Identification, intensification and (inter)subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics22(4). 765–797. 10.1515/cogl.2011.028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.028 [Google Scholar]
17. Gries, Stefan Th
    2013 Elementary statistical testing with R. InManfred G. Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 361–381. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511792519.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792519.024 [Google Scholar]
18. Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn
    1997 Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst [Comprehensive Dutch grammar]. Groningen: Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Haspelmath, Martin
    2004 On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. InOlga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 17–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.59.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.59.03has [Google Scholar]
21. Heine, Bernd
    2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. InIlse Wisher & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
22. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2001 Articles. InMartin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: Volume1, 831–841. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hole, Daniel & Gerson Klumpp
    2000 Definite type and indefinite token: The article son in colloquial German. Linguistische Berichte182. 231–244.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Horst, Joop M. van der
    2008 Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis [History of Dutch syntax]. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Horst, Joop M. van der & Freek Van de Velde
    2003 Zo vreemd een groep [So strange a group]. Taal en Tongval15/16. 237–250.
    [Google Scholar]
26. IBM Corp.
    IBM Corp. 2013 IBM SPSS statistics for Windows: Version 22.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Koninklijke Bibliotheek
    Koninklijke Bibliotheek 2015 Digitale bibliotheek voor de Nederlandse letteren [Digital library of Dutch literature]. The Hague. Available online atwww.dbnl.org
    [Google Scholar]
28. Narrog, Heiko
    2011 The limits of (inter)subjectification. Paper presented inDecember at the University of Leuven.
29. Narrog, Heiko
    2012 Beyond intersubjectification: Textual uses of modality and mood in subordinate clauses as part of speech-act orientation. English Text Construction5(1). 29–52. 10.1075/etc.5.1.03nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.03nar [Google Scholar]
30. Nederlandse Taalunie
    Nederlandse Taalunie. Corpus gesproken Nederlands 1.0 [Corpus of spoken Dutch 1.0]. The Hague.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Rayson, Paul E. & Roger Garside
    2000 Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics Workshop on Comparing Corpora at their 38th Annual Meeting, 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Scott, Mike
    2012 WordSmith tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Smitterberg, Erik
    2016 Extracting data from historical material. InMerja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics, 181–199. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139600231.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139600231.012 [Google Scholar]
34. Spinillo, Miriangela
    2003 On such. English Language and Linguistics7(2). 195–210. 10.1017/S1360674302001004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674302001004 [Google Scholar]
35. Tantucci, Vittorio
    2013 Interpersonal evidentiality: The Mandarin V-过 guo construction and other evidential systems beyond the ‘source of information’. Journal of Pragmatics57. 210–230. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.013 [Google Scholar]
36. Tantucci, Vittorio
    2015 From immediate to extended intersubjectification: A gradient approach to intersubjective awareness and semasiological change. Language and Cognition. Available online atjournals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=10088734&fileId=S1866980815000265; accessedMarch 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tantucci, Vittorio
    2016 Textual factualization: The phenomenology of assertive reformulation and presupposition during a speech event. Journal of Pragmatics101. 155–171. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.007 [Google Scholar]
38. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1982 From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. InWinfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics, 245–271. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
39. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2003 From subjectification to intersubjectification. InRaymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 [Google Scholar]
40. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2006 The semantic development of scalar focus modifiers. InAns van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), Handbook on the history of English, 335–359. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470757048.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch14 [Google Scholar]
41. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. InKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), 29–71.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher
    2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Van Olmen, Daniël
    2013 The imperative of say as a pragmatic marker in English and Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics25(3). 247–287. 10.1017/S1470542713000123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542713000123 [Google Scholar]
44. Van Olmen, Daniël & Johan van der Auwera
    2014 Over zo’n and zo meer [On zo’n and so on]. InFreek Van de Velde, Hans Smessaert, Frank Van Eynde & Sara Verbrugge (eds.), Patroon en argument: Een dubbelfeestbundel bij het emeritaat van William Van Belle en Joop van der Horst [Pattern and argument: A double festschrift on the occasion of the retirements of William Van Belle and Joop van der Horst], 215–228. Leuven: Leuven University Press. 10.2307/j.ctt14jxsr0.17
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14jxsr0.17 [Google Scholar]
45. WNT
    WNT 2010 [1864–1998] Woordenboek der Nederlandsche taal [Dictionary of the Dutch language]. Leiden. Available online atgtb.inl.nl/?owner=WNT, accessedJuly 2015.
    [Google Scholar]