1887
Volume 26, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates the association between language patterns and attitudinal meanings, focusing specifically on adjective complementation patterns and types of attitudes as proposed in the Appraisal framework (Martin & White 2005). The investigation shows that the tripartite division of Attitude into Affect, Judgement and Appreciation can be supported with pattern differentials. The detailed scrutiny of adjective patterns with respect to the system supports Bednarek’s (2009) argument that both aspects of attitudinal lexis (emotion or opinion lexis) and attitudinal target (the entity being evaluated) should be considered in analysing appraisal expressions, which leads to the proposal that Appraisal is in essence instantiated by choices made simultaneously in terms of the attitudinal lexis that is used and the attitudinal target that is involved.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.16030.su
2019-11-25
2020-08-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alba-Juez, Laura & Geoff Thompson
    2014 The many faces and phases of evaluation. InGeoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 3–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, John
    1957 A plea for excuses. InProceedings of the Aristotelian SocietyVol.57 (1956–1957), 1–30. Available online atwww.jstor.org/stable/4544570
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul
    2006Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bednarek, Monika
    2006Evaluation in media discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2009 Language patterns and ATTITUDE. Functions of Language16(2). 165–192. 10.1075/fol.16.2.01bed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.01bed [Google Scholar]
  6. Coffin, Caroline
    2006Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Conrad, Susan & Douglas Biber
    2000 Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. InSusan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 56–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 The stance triangle. InRobert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  9. Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
    1997Analyzing causal conversation. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Englebretson, Robert
    (ed.) 2007Stancetaking in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164 [Google Scholar]
  11. Felices-Lago, Ángel & María Enriqueta Cortés-de-los-Ríos
    2014 The implementation of the axiological parameter in a verbal subontology for natural language processing. InGeoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 117–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Francis, Gill, Susan Hunston & Elizabeth Manning
    1996Collins Cobuild grammar patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1998Collins Cobuild grammar patterns 2: Nouns and adjectives. London: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldberg, Adele
    1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1994An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn.London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoey, Michael
    1983On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffman, Sebastian, Stefan Evert, Nicholas Smith, David Y. W. Lee & Ylva Berglund
    2008Corpus linguistics with BNCweb: A practical guide. Oxford: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hood, Susan
    2010Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230274662
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunston, Susan
    2003 Frame, phrase or function: A comparison of frame semantics and local grammars. InDawn Archer, Paul Rayson, Andrew Wilson & Tony McEnery (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 conference, 342–358. UCREL technical paper number 16. UCREL, Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2011Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson
    (eds.) 2000Evaluation in text. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hunston, Susan & Gill Francis
    2000Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunston, Susan & John Sinclair
    2000 A local grammar of evaluation. InSusan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 74–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Macken-Horarik, Mary & J. R. Martin
    (eds.) 2003 Negotiating heteroglossia: Social perspectives on evaluation. Text23 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin, J. R.
    2000 Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. InSusan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 142–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2003 Introduction. Text23(2). 171–181. 10.1515/text.2003.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.007 [Google Scholar]
  28. Martin, J. R. & David Rose
    2003Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Martin, J. R. & Peter White
    2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  30. Millar, Neil & Susan Hunston
    2015 Adjectives, communities, and taxonomies of evaluative meaning. Functions of Language22(3). 297–331. 10.1075/fol.22.3.01mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.3.01mil [Google Scholar]
  31. Moreno-Ortiz, Antonio & Chantal Pérez-Hernández
    2014 Form and function in evaluative language: The use of corpora to identify contextual valence in a linguistically-motivated sentiment analysis system. InMaría de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez-García & Angela Downing (eds.), The functional perspective on language and discourse: Applications and implications, 87–110. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.247.05mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.05mor [Google Scholar]
  32. Ochs, Elinor
    (ed.) 1989 The pragmatics of affect. Text9(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin
    1989 Language has a heart. Text9(1). 7–25. 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pang, Bo & Lillian Lee
    2008 Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval2(1–2). 1–135. 10.1561/1500000011
    https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011 [Google Scholar]
  35. Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid & Charlotte Taylor
    2013Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.55
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55 [Google Scholar]
  36. Saucier, Gerard & Lewis Goldberg
    2001 Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality69(6). 847–879. 10.1111/1467‑6494.696167
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696167 [Google Scholar]
  37. Silk, Alex
    2016Discourse contextualism: A framework for contextualist semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783923.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sinclair, John
    1991Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2004Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Su, Hang
    2015 Adjective complementation patterns and Judgement in biographical discourse: A corpus study. Birmingham: University of Birmingham PhD thesis.
  41. Su, Hang & Susan Hunston
    2019 Adjective complementation patterns and judgement: Aligning lexical-grammatical and discourse-semantic approaches in appraisal research. Text & Talk39(3). 415–439. 10.1515/text‑2019‑2031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2031 [Google Scholar]
  42. Thompson, Geoff
    2010 Review of Emotion Talk across Corpora. Linguistics and the Human Sciences3(3). 399–404.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2014 AFFECT and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls: Refining the APPRAISAL model. InGeoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 47–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Thompson, Geoff & Laura Alba-Juez
    (eds.) 2014Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242 [Google Scholar]
  45. Turney, Peter
    2002 Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. InProceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 417–424.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. White, Peter
    2000 Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. InMalcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill & Frances Rock (eds.), Working with dialogue, 67–80. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110941265‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110941265-006 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2003 Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text23(2). 259–284. 10.1515/text.2003.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.011 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2011 Appraisal. InJan Zienknowski, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Discursive pragmatics, 14–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.8.02whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.02whi [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.16030.su
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.16030.su
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error