Competing ditransitive constructions in Enets

References

1. Castrén, M. Alexander
   1854 Grammatik der samojedischen Sprachen. St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Conti, Carmen
   2008 Receptores y beneficiarios: Estudio tipológico de la ditransitividad. München: Lincom Europa.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Creissels, Denis
   1979 Les constructions dites “possessives”: Etude de linguistique générale et de typologie linguistique. Paris: Université Paris 4.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Creissels, Denis & Michael Daniel
   2006 Monotransitivity in ‘give’-constructions: Exploring the periphery of ditransitives. Paper presented at the‘Rara and Rarissima’ Conference in Leipzig.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Du Bois, John W.
   1987 The discourse basis of ergativity. Language63. 805–855. 10.2307/415719
   https://doi.org/10.2307/415719 [Google Scholar]
6. Du Bois, John W. , Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby
   2003 Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (Studies in discourse and grammar 14). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.14
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.14 [Google Scholar]
7. Enç, Mürvet
   1991 The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry22(1). 1–25.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gerland, Doris
   2014 Definitely not possessed? Possessive suffixes with definiteness marking Function. In Thomas Gamerschlag , Doris Gerland , Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen (eds.), Frames and concept types: Applications in language and philosophy (Studies in linguistics and philosophy 94), 269–292. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑01541‑5_12
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01541-5_12 [Google Scholar]
9. Givón, Talmy
   1984 Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Vol.1. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.17
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.17 [Google Scholar]
10. Haspelmath, Martin
    2015 Ditransitive constructions. Annual Review of Linguistics1. 19–41. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125204
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125204 [Google Scholar]
11. Helimski, Eugen A.
    1994 Očerk morfonologii i slovoizmenitel’noj morfologii nganasanskogo jazyka [A sketch of Nganasan morphophonology and inflectional morphology]. In Eugen A. Helimski (ed.), Tajmyrskij ètnolingvističeskij sbornik [Tajmyr ethnolinguistic paper collection], Vol.1: Materialy po nganasanskomu šamanstvu i jazyku [Data on Nganasan shamanism and language], 190–221. Moscow: Russian State University for Humanities.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Helimski, Eugen
    1998 Nganasan. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 480–515. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Helimski, Eugen
    . Manuscript. Materialy k slovarju èneckogo jazyka [Materials for an Enets dictionary]. Available online atwww.uni-hamburg.de/ifuu/Arbeiten_/Helimski-Enzisch.zip
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
    2004 Polysemy in Basque locational cases. Belgian Journal of Linguistics18. 271–298. 10.1075/bjl.18.14iba
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.18.14iba [Google Scholar]
15. Ioup, Georgette
    1977 Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy1. 233–245.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Janhunen, Juha
    1989 Samojedin predestinatiivisen deklinaation alkuperästä. Suomalais Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskirja82. 298–201.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kazama, Shinjiro
    2012 Designative case in Tungusic languages. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics, 123–154. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky
    2013 Jadernye padeži suščestvitel’nyx v èneckom jazyke: V poiskax adekvatnogo opisanija [Core cases in Enets: a search for an appropriate description]. In Tatiana Agranat , Olga Kazakevič & Egor Kashkin (eds.), Lingvističeskij bespredel 2. Festschrift for Ariadna Kuznecova, 76–94. Moscow: Izdatel̘’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky
    2014 A rare type of benefactive construction: Evidence from Enets. Linguistics52(6). 1391–1431. doi: 10.1515/ling‑2014‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0025 [Google Scholar]
20. Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky
    2015 Prjamoj ob”ekt v èneckom jazyke: Ob”ektnoe soglasovanie glagola [Direct object in Enets: Object cross-reference on a verb]. In Ekaterina Lyutikova , Anton Zimmerling & Maria Konoshenko (eds.), Tipologija morfosintaksičeskix parametrov, Vyp. 2 [Typology of morphosyntactic parameters, Vol. 2], 392–410. Moscow: MPGU.
21. Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky
    2017 Enets object cross-reference: Syntactic marking of information structure. Paper presented atSyntax of Uralic languages (SOUL) 2017, Budapest, June 27–28.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Künnap, Ago Ju.
    1974 Sklonenie i sprjaženie v samodijskix jazykax [Declension and conjugation in Samoyedic languages]. Tartu: University of Tartu Habilitation thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Künnap, Ago
    2004 About the non-personal definite function of the Uralic 3rd person possessive suffix. Linguistica Uralica40(1). 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
25. Leisiö, Larisa
    2014 Imennye kategorii vremeni v nganasanskom i drugix severnosamodijskix jazykax [The categories of nominal tense in Nganasan and other Northern Samoyedic languages]. Voprosy jazykoznanija1. 39–59.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Malchukov, Andrej
    2018 Typological remarks on “internal” beneficiaries and the benefactive-possessive convergence. In Agnes Korn & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Ditransitive constructions in a typological perspective, 13–25. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Malchukov, Andrej , Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie
    2010 Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Andrej Malchukov , Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions, 1–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110220377.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220377.1 [Google Scholar]
28. Margetts, Anna & Peter Austin
    2007 Three-participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics45(3). 393–451. 10.1515/LING.2007.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2007.014 [Google Scholar]
29. Mikola, Tibor
    2004 Studien zur Geschichte der samojedischen Sprachen. Szeged: SzTE Finnisch-Ugrisches Institut.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Galina A. Otaina
    2013 A syntax of the Nivkh language: The Amur dialect. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.139
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.139 [Google Scholar]
31. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2003 Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds.), International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia, 130–145. Iževsk & Leipzig: Udmurt State University; Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2009 Nominal tense in Tundra Nenets and Northern Samoyedic. In Peter Austin , Oliver Bond , Monik Charette , David Nathan & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of the conference on language documentation and linguistic theory2, 241–250. SOAS: Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project and Department of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2014 A grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110320640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110320640 [Google Scholar]
34. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2015 On the expression of TAM on nouns: Evidence from Tundra Nenets. Lingua166. 99–126. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.006 [Google Scholar]
35. Schröder, Christoph
    2006 Articles and article systems in some areas of Europe. In Guiliano Bernini & Marcia Schwartz (eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, 545–615. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892222.545
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892222.545 [Google Scholar]
36. Siegl, Florian
    2013 Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Siegl, Florian
    2015 The structure of noun phrases with referential PX.2P in Northern Samoyedic. Tomsk Journal for Linguistics and Anthropology1(7). 21–31.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Sorokina, Irina P.
    2010 Èneckij jazyk [Enets]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sorokina, Irina P. & Dar’ja S. Bolina
    2005 Èneckie teksty [Enets texts]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Tereščenko, Natal’ja M.
    1966 Èneckij jazyk [Enets]. In Vasilij E. Lytkin & Klara E. Majtinskaja (eds.), Jazyki narodov SSSR: Finno-ugorskie i samodijskie yazyki [Languages of the USSR: Fenno-Ugric and Samoyedic languages], 438–457. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Tereščenko, Natal’ja M.
    1977 K genezisu lično-prednaznačitel’nyx (deziderativnyx) form severnosamodijskix jazykov [On the genesis of the destinative (desiderative) forms of the Northern Samoyedic languages]. Fenno-Ugristica4. 95–105.
    [Google Scholar]