Does functional linguistics have a ‘fundamental unity’?

References

1. Allen, Keith
   2007 The Western classical tradition in linguistics. London: Equinox.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andersen, Thomas Hestbæk
   2017 Interpersonal meaning and the clause. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 115–130.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Austin, J. L.
   1962 How to do things with words. Oxford: OUP.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bartlett, Tom & Gerard O’Grady
   (eds.) 2017 The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315413891
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891 [Google Scholar]
5. Berry, Margaret
   2016 Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction9(1). 33–55. 10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
   1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bowcher, Wendy L.
   2017 Field, tenor and mode. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 391–403.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Butler, Christopher S.
   2003a Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Butler, Christopher S.
   2003b Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Butler, Christopher S.
    2004 Corpus linguistics and functional linguistic theories. Functions of Language11(2). 147–186. 10.1075/fol.11.2.02but
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.11.2.02but [Google Scholar]
11. Butler, Christopher S.
    2008 Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences30. 1–30. 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.006 [Google Scholar]
12. Butler, Christopher S.
    2009 Criteria of adequacy in functional linguistics. Folia Linguistica43(1). 1–66. 10.1515/FLIN.2009.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/FLIN.2009.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Butler, Christopher S.
    2013 Systemic Functional Linguistics, Cognitive Linguistics and psycholinguistics: opportunities for dialogue. Functions of Language20(2). 185–218. 10.1075/fol.20.2.03but
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20.2.03but [Google Scholar]
14. Butler, Christopher S. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García
    2014 Exploring functional-cognitive space (Studies in Language Companion Series 157). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.157
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.157 [Google Scholar]
15. Butler, Christopher S. & Miriam Taverniers
    2008 Layering in functional grammars: An introductory survey. Linguistics46(2). 689–756.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Caffarel, Alice, J. R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    (eds.) 2004 Language typology: A functional perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.253
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253 [Google Scholar]
17. Culicover, Peter W. & Ray J. Jackendoff
    2005 Simpler syntax. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271092.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
18. Davies, Mark
    2004 BYU-BNC. (Based on theBritish National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online atcorpus.byu.edu/bnc/
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dik, Simon C.
    1997 The theory of Functional Grammar. Part1: The structure of the clause. 2nd edn., Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Facchinetti, Roberta, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer
    (eds.) 2003 Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110895339
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895339 [Google Scholar]
21. Fawcett, Robin P.
    2000 A theory of syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 206). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.206
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.206 [Google Scholar]
22. Fawcett, Robin P.
    2008 Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics through the Cardiff Grammar: An extension and simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar, 3rd edn.London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fawcett, Robin P.
    2011 A semantic system network for MOOD in English. ‘Work in progress’version available from[email protected]
24. Fawcett, Robin P.
    2017 From meaning to form in the Cardiff Model of language and its use. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 56–76.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gardner, Sheena
    2017 Systemic functional linguistics and genre studies. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 473–488.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gotti, Maurizio
    2003 Shall and will in contemporary English: A comparison with past uses. InRoberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds.), 267–300.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1978 Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1994 Systemic theory. InRonald E. Asher & James M. Y. Simpson (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 4505–4508. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Halliday, M. A. K.
    2002 Introduction: A personal perspective. InJonathan J. Webster (ed.), On grammar (Collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, Vol. 1), 1–14. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    1999 Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 An introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn.Revised byChristian M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
32. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2013 Choice, system, realisation: Describing language as meaning potential. InLise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice, 269–299. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018 [Google Scholar]
33. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2014 Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. Functional Linguistics1(9).
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hasan, Ruqaiya, Carmel Cloran, Geoffrey Williams & Annabelle Lukin
    2007 Semantic networks: The description of linguistic meaning in SFL. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), 697–738.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Hasan, Ruqaiya, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster
    (eds.) 2007 Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective. Vol2. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hengeveld, Kees, Eli Nazareth Bechara, Roberto Gomes Camacho, Alessandra Regina Guerra, Taísa Peres de Oliveira, Eduardo Penhavel, Erotilde Goreti Pezatti, Liliane Santana, Edson Rosa Francisco de Souza & Maria Luiza de Sousa Teixeira
    2007 Basic illocutions in the native languages of Brazil. Alfa-Revista de Lingüística51(2). 73–90.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
    2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
38. Jackendoff, Ray J.
    2007 A whole lot of challenges for linguistics. Journal of English Linguistics30(3). 353–358.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M.
    2008 Psychological explanations in Gricean pragmatics and Frege’s legacy. InIstvan Kecskes & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intentions, common ground, and egocentric speaker-hearer, 9–44. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús & Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla
    2010 Systemic-Functional Grammar of Spanish: A contrastive study with English. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Leech, Geoffrey
    2003 Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. InRoberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds.), 223–240.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Levelt, Willem J. M.
    1989 Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lyons, John
    1977 Semantics. Vol.1. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Martin, J. R.
    1992 English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
45. Martin, J. R.
    2018 Interpersonal meaning. Systemic functional linguistics perspectives. Functions of Language25(1).
    [Google Scholar]
46. Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
    2007 Lexicogrammar in systemic functional linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical developments in the ‘IFG’ tradition since the 1970s. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), 765–858.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Moore, Alison R.
    2017 Register analysis in Systemic Functional Linguistics. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 418–437.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. & Winfred W. Xuan
    2016 A survey of studies in Systemic Functional language description and typology. Functional Linguistics3(8).
    [Google Scholar]
49. Nuyts, Jan
    2005 Brothers in arms? On the relations between functional and cognitive linguistics. InFrancisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. Sandra Peña Carvel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 69–100. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Siewierska, Anna
    2013 Functional and cognitive grammars. InKeith Allan (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, 485–501. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Smirnova, Elena & Tanja Mortelmans
    2010 Funktionale Grammatik: Konzepte und Theorien. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110223873
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223873 [Google Scholar]
52. Tann, Ken
    2017 Context and meaning in the Sydney architecture of Systemic Functional Linguistics. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 438–456.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Teruya, Kazuhiro, Ernest Akerejola, Thomas H. Anderson, Alice Caffarel, Julia Lavid, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, Uwe H. Petersen, Pattama Patpong & Flemming Smedegaard
    2007 Typology of MOOD: A text-based and system-based view. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), 859–920.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Teruya, Kazuhiro & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2015 Halliday in relation to language comparison and typology. InJonathan J. Webster (ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to M. A. K. Halliday, 427–452. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
    1993 A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. InRobert D. Van Valin (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 82), 1–164. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
    2005 Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
57. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
    2008 RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories in Role and Reference Grammar. InRobert D. Van Valin (ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface (Studies in Language Companion Series 105), 161–178. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.105.14van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.14van [Google Scholar]
58. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
    2010 Role and Reference Grammar as a framework for linguistic analysis. InBernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 703–738. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla
    1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
60. Wray, Alison
    2014 Developing comprehensive criteria of adequacy: The challenge of hybridity. InMaría de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco Gonzálvez García & Angela Downing (eds.), The functional perspective on language and discourse, 19–36. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.247.02wra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.02wra [Google Scholar]