English tag questions eliciting knowledge or action

References

1. Athanasiadou, Angeliki
   1991 The discourse function of questions. Pragmatics1. 107–122. 10.1075/prag.1.1.02ath
   https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.1.1.02ath [Google Scholar]
2. Axelsson, Karin
   2011 Tag questions in fiction dialogue. Göteborg: University of GothenburgPhD thesis. Available online athdl.handle.net/2077/24047
3. Bald, Wolf-Dietrich
   1979 English tag questions and intonation. InKuno Schumann (ed.), Anglistentag, 263–292. Berlin: Technische Universität.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beckman, Mary E. & Gayle Elam Ayers
   1993 Guidelines for ToBI labelling: The Ohio State University Research Foundation. Available online atwww.ling.ohio-state.edu//~tobi/ame_tobi/labelling_guide_v3.pdf
5. Berry, Margaret
   1981a Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. InMalcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berry, Margaret
   1981b Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network2. 23–32.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berry, Margaret
   1981c Polarity, ellipticity and propositional development: Their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange. (A discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s classes of move.) Nottingham Linguistic Circular10. 36–63.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Berry, Margaret
   2016 Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction9. 33–55. 10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber [Google Scholar]
9. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
   2015 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.04. www.praat.org
10. Burton, Deirdre
    1980 Dialogue and discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Coulthard, Malcolm & David Brazil
    1979 Exchange structure. Discourse Analysis Monographs 6. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Margaret Seltink & Paul Drew
    1996 Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862 [Google Scholar]
13. Kimps, Ditte
    2007 Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis of their form, meaning and attitudinal uses. Journal of Pragmatics39. 270–291. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.003 [Google Scholar]
14. Kimps, Ditte
    2018 Tag questions in conversation: A typology of their interactional and stance meanings. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.83
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.83 [Google Scholar]
15. Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Bert Cornillie
    2014 A speech function analysis of tag questions in British English spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics66. 64–85. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.013 [Google Scholar]
16. Davies, Eirian
    2001 Propositional attitudes. Functions of Language8. 217–251. 10.1075/fol.8.2.04dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.8.2.04dav [Google Scholar]
17. Drew, Paul
    2012 What drives sequences?Research of Language and Social Interaction45. 61–68. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646688
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646688 [Google Scholar]
18. Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
    1997 Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1964 English system networks. InGunther Kress (ed.), Halliday: System and function in language. Selected papers (1976), 101–135. London: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1970 Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language6. 322–361.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1985 An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2004 An introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn.London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly68. 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
24. Levshina, Natalia
    2015 How to do Linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
25. Martin, James
    1981 How many speech acts?InWang Zhenhua (ed.), Discourse Semantics: Collected Works of J. R. Martin. Vol.2 (2010), 35–57. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Martin, James
    1992 English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
27. Muntigl, Peter
    2009 Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges: Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers. Functions of Language16. 225–263. 10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun [Google Scholar]
28. O’Donnell, Michael
    1990 A dynamic model of exchange. WORD41. 293–327. 10.1080/00437956.1990.11435825
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1990.11435825 [Google Scholar]
29. O’Grady, Gerard
    2010 A grammar of spoken English discourse. The intonation of increments. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
30. O’Grady, Gerard
    2013 Key concepts in phonetics and phonology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
31. O’Grady, Gerard
    2016 Given/New: What do the terms refer to? A first (small) step. English Text Construction9. 7–32. 10.1075/etc.9.1.02ogr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.02ogr [Google Scholar]
32. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rose, David
    2014 Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics1. 1–32. 10.1186/s40554‑014‑0011‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-014-0011-4 [Google Scholar]
34. Schegloff, Emmanuel & Harvey Sacks
    1973 Opening up Closings. Semiotica7. 289–327.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard
    1975 Towards an analysis of discourse. London: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Stenström, Anna-Brita
    1984 Questions and responses in English conversation. Lund Studies in English 68. Lund: Liber/Gleerups.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tomasello, Michael
    2014 A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674726369
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726369 [Google Scholar]
38. Tsui, Amy
    1994 English conversation. London: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Ventola, Eija
    1987 The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Frances Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
    2007 Rethinking the coordinate-subordinate dichotomy. Interpersonal grammar and the analysis of adverbial clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110918199
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110918199 [Google Scholar]