1887
Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

English tag questions eliciting knowledge or action, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fol.18019.kim-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.18019.kim
2019-05-27
2019-08-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Athanasiadou, Angeliki
    1991 The discourse function of questions. Pragmatics1. 107–122. 10.1075/prag.1.1.02ath
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.1.1.02ath [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelsson, Karin
    2011 Tag questions in fiction dialogue. Göteborg: University of GothenburgPhD thesis. Available online athdl.handle.net/2077/24047
  3. Bald, Wolf-Dietrich
    1979 English tag questions and intonation. InKuno Schumann (ed.), Anglistentag, 263–292. Berlin: Technische Universität.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beckman, Mary E. & Gayle Elam Ayers
    1993 Guidelines for ToBI labelling: The Ohio State University Research Foundation. Available online atwww.ling.ohio-state.edu//~tobi/ame_tobi/labelling_guide_v3.pdf
  5. Berry, Margaret
    1981a Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. InMalcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1981b Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network2. 23–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1981c Polarity, ellipticity and propositional development: Their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange. (A discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s classes of move.) Nottingham Linguistic Circular10. 36–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2016 Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction9. 33–55. 10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.03ber [Google Scholar]
  9. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
    2015 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.04. www.praat.org
  10. Burton, Deirdre
    1980Dialogue and discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coulthard, Malcolm & David Brazil
    1979Exchange structure. Discourse Analysis Monographs 6. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Margaret Seltink & Paul Drew
    1996Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimps, Ditte
    2007 Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis of their form, meaning and attitudinal uses. Journal of Pragmatics39. 270–291. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2018Tag questions in conversation: A typology of their interactional and stance meanings. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.83
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.83 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Bert Cornillie
    2014 A speech function analysis of tag questions in British English spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics66. 64–85. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.013 [Google Scholar]
  16. Davies, Eirian
    2001 Propositional attitudes. Functions of Language8. 217–251. 10.1075/fol.8.2.04dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.8.2.04dav [Google Scholar]
  17. Drew, Paul
    2012 What drives sequences?Research of Language and Social Interaction45. 61–68. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646688
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646688 [Google Scholar]
  18. Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
    1997Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1964 English system networks. InGunther Kress (ed.), Halliday: System and function in language. Selected papers (1976), 101–135. London: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 1970 Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language6. 322–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1985An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2004An introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn.London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly68. 15–38. 10.1177/019027250506800103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103 [Google Scholar]
  24. Levshina, Natalia
    2015How to do Linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  25. Martin, James
    1981 How many speech acts?InWang Zhenhua (ed.), Discourse Semantics: Collected Works of J. R. Martin. Vol.2 (2010), 35–57. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  27. Muntigl, Peter
    2009 Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges: Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers. Functions of Language16. 225–263. 10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.03mun [Google Scholar]
  28. O’Donnell, Michael
    1990 A dynamic model of exchange. WORD41. 293–327. 10.1080/00437956.1990.11435825
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1990.11435825 [Google Scholar]
  29. O’Grady, Gerard
    2010A grammar of spoken English discourse. The intonation of increments. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2013Key concepts in phonetics and phonology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2016 Given/New: What do the terms refer to? A first (small) step. English Text Construction9. 7–32. 10.1075/etc.9.1.02ogr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.02ogr [Google Scholar]
  32. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rose, David
    2014 Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics1. 1–32. 10.1186/s40554‑014‑0011‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-014-0011-4 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schegloff, Emmanuel & Harvey Sacks
    1973 Opening up Closings. Semiotica7. 289–327.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard
    1975Towards an analysis of discourse. London: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Stenström, Anna-Brita
    1984Questions and responses in English conversation. Lund Studies in English 68. Lund: Liber/Gleerups.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Tomasello, Michael
    2014A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674726369
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674726369 [Google Scholar]
  38. Tsui, Amy
    1994English conversation. London: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ventola, Eija
    1987The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Frances Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
    2007Rethinking the coordinate-subordinate dichotomy. Interpersonal grammar and the analysis of adverbial clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110918199
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110918199 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.18019.kim
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.18019.kim
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error