Volume 26, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Berry, Margaret
    1975Introduction to Systemic Linguistics, Vol 1: Structures and systems. London: Batsford.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1977Introduction to Systemic Linguistics, Vol 2: Levels and links. London: Batsford.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1980 They’re all out of step except our Johnny: A discussion of motivation (or lack of it) in systemic linguistics. Occasional Papers in Systemic LinguisticsVol3. 5–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1981a Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. InMalcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 1981b Polarity, ellipticity, elicitation and propositional development: Their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange. Nottingham Linguistic Circular10. 36–63.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1981c Towards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network2. 23–32. Available online atblogs.cardiff.ac.uk/linc/network-newsletter
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1982 Review of Halliday, 1978, Language as social semiotic, London: Arnold. Nottingham Linguistic Circular11. 64–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1987aProjects for Modern English language courses. Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1987b Is teacher an unanalysed concept?InM. A. K. Halliday & Robin Fawcett (eds.), New developments in Systemic Linguistics, Vol 1: Theory and description, 41–63. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1995 Thematic options and success in writing. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts, 55–84. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 1996 What is Theme? A(nother) personal view. InMargaret Berry, Christopher Butler, Robin Fawcett & Guowen Huang (eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic Functional interpretations. Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 1–64. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2013 Towards a study of the differences between formal written English and informal spoken English. InLise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice, 243–268. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.022 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2014 On describing contexts of situation: A theoretical view. InSiân Alsop & Sheena Gardner (eds.), Language in a digital age: Be not afraid of digitality. Proceedings from the 24th European Systemic Functional Linguistics conference and workshop, 1–3July 2013, 17–19. Coventry: Coventry University. Available online atcurve.coventry.ac.uk/open/items/7b5b94aa-6984-48ad-b29a-9a8e9483fa2d/1/
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016 On describing contexts of situation. InWendy Bowcher & Jennifer Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society, 184–205. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137402868_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Berry, Margaret, Geoff Thompson & Hilary Hillier
    2014 Theme and variations. InMaría de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds.), Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space. Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 107–126. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Davies, Flo
    1997 Marked Theme as a heuristic for analysing text-type, text and genre. InJordi Pique & David Viera (eds.), Applied languages: Theory and practice in ESP, 45–71. Universitat de Valencia: Servei de Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ervin-Tripp, Susan
    1976 Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society5. 25–66. 10.1017/S0047404500006849
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006849 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fawcett, Robin P.
    1973 [1981]  Generating a sentence in Systemic Functional grammar. University College London. Reprinted inM. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (eds.), Readings in Systemic Linguistics, 146–183. London: Batsford.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Forey, Gail
    2009 Projecting clauses: Interpersonal realisation of control and power in workplace texts. InGail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture, 151–174. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gardner, Sheena
    2004 Four critical features of teacher-guided reporting in infant science and literacy contexts. Language and Education18/5. 361–378. 10.1080/09500780408666889
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780408666889 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2006 Centre-stage in the instructional register: Partnership talk in primary EAL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 9(4). 476–494. 10.2167/beb342.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/beb342.0 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2008 Transforming talk and phonics practice: Or, how do crabs clap?TESOL Quarterly42. 261–284. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00118.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00118.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Gardner, Sheena & Aizan Yaacob
    2009 CD-ROM multimodal affordances: Classroom interaction perspectives in the Malaysian English literacy hour. Language and Education23(5). 409–424. 10.1080/09500780802691751
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802691751 [Google Scholar]
  24. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1961 Categories of the theory of grammar. Word17. 241–292. 10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1961.11659756 [Google Scholar]
  25. 1969 Options and functions in the English clause. Brno Papers in Linguistics8. 81–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1970 Language structure and language function. InJohn Lyons (ed.), New horizons in linguistics, 140–165. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1973Explorations in the functions of language. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1978Language as Social Semiotic: the Social Interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hillier, Hilary
    1992The language of spontaneous interaction between children aged 7–12: Instigating action. (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 4). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2004Analysing real texts: Research studies in modern English language. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑05005‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05005-2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hood, Susan
    2009 Texturing interpersonal meanings in academic argument: Pulses and prosodies of value. InGail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture, 216–233. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Labov, William & David Fanshel
    1977Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Magee, Bryan
    1973Popper. Glasgow: Fontana.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin, James
    1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  35. Matthiessen, Christian
    1995Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Morgan, Jerry L. & Manfred B. Sellner
    1980 Discourse and linguistic theory. InRand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce & William F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence and education, 165–200. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. North, Sarah
    2005 Disciplinary variation in the use of Theme in undergraduate essays. Applied Linguistics26(3). 431–452. 10.1093/applin/ami023
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami023 [Google Scholar]
  38. Quirk, Randolf, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1972A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard
    1975Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sinclair, John
    1980Discourse in relation to language structure and semiotics. InSidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik (eds.), Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk, 110–124. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ventola, Eija
    1987The structure of social interaction. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wickens, Paul
    2000 Computer-based learning and changing legal pedagogical orders of discourse in UK higher education: A comparative critical discourse analysis of the TLTP materials in law. Warwick: University of WarwickPhD thesis. Available online atwrap.warwick.ac.uk/4030/
  • Article Type: Other
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error