The role of (historical) pragmatics in the use of response particles

References

1. Corpus CLAPI
   Corpus CLAPI: clapi.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/V3_Accueil.php?interface_langue=FR
2. Frantext
   Frantext: www.frantext.fr/
3. Perseus Digital Library
   Perseus Digital Library: www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/
4. Cole, Peter & Jerry L. Morgan
   eds. Syntax and semantics (vol.3). New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cruse, David Alan
   1986 Lexical semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fretheim, Thorstein
   2017 The pragmatics of yes and no. InStavros Assimakopoulos (ed.), Pragmatics and its interfaces, 175–200. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gordon, David & George Lakoff
   1975 Conversational postulates. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), 83–106.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Grice, Herbert Paul
   1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
   2008 Particles at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues. A study with special reference to the French phasal adverbs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2011 On the evolution of temporal n-words in Medieval French. Language Sciences34(1). 76–91. 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.003 [Google Scholar]
11. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2014 The grammaticalization of negative indefinites: The case of the temporal/aspectual n-words plus and mais in Medieval French. InMaj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), The diachrony of negation, 185–212. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2018 The expression of clause negation: From Latin to early French. InAnne Carlier & Céline Guillot-Barbance (eds.), Latin tardif, français: Continuïtés et ruptures, 267–295. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110551716‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551716-014 [Google Scholar]
13. Heine, Bernd
    2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. InIlse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
14. Heinz, Sieglinde
    1976 Bejahung und Verneinung. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur86(4). 289–316.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Holmberg, Anders
    2016 The syntax of yes and no. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Høybye, Poul
    1939 Oui, si et non. Le français moderne7. 47–51.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2001 Oui, non, si: Un trio célèbre et méconnu. Marges linguistiques2. 95–119.
    [Google Scholar]
19. König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
    2007 Speech act distinctions in grammar. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), 276–324.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Larrivée, Pierre
    2011 The role of pragmatics in grammatical change: The case of French preverbal non. Journal of Pragmatics43. 1987–1996. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.012 [Google Scholar]
21. Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
    1985 Dire le vrai: L’adverbe si en français médiéval. Geneva: Droz.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Martinet, André
    1952 Function, structure, and sound change. Word8. 1–32. 10.1080/00437956.1952.11659416
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1952.11659416 [Google Scholar]
23. Plantin, Christian
    1982 Oui et non sont-ils des pro-phrases?Le français moderne50. 252–265.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pohl, Jacques
    1976 Matériaux pour l’histoire du système oui-non-si. Kwartalnik neofilologiiczny23. 197–208.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pope, Emily Norwood
    1972 Questions and answers in English. Harvard, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.
26. Reid, Thomas Bertram Wallace
    1939 Non, nen, and ne with finite verbs in French. InStudies in French language and Mediaeval literature: Presented to Professor Mildred K. Pope by pupils, colleagues and friends, 305–313. Manchester: MUP.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Roelofsen, Floris & Donka Farkas
    2015 Polarity particle responses as a window on the interpretation of questions and assertions. Language91(2). 359–414. 10.1353/lan.2015.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0017 [Google Scholar]
28. Roulet, Eddy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, Christian Rubattel & Marianne Schelling
    1987 L’articulation du discours en français contemporain, 2nd edn.Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sadock, Jerrold M. & Arnold M. Zwicky
    1985 Speech act distinctions in syntax. InTimothy Shopen, (ed.), 155–196.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Shopen, Timothy
    (ed.) 1985 Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 1: Clause structure. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Thesleff, Holger
    1960 Yes and no in Plautus and Terence. Helsingfors: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Wallage, Phillip & Win van der Wurff
    2013 On saying yes in early Anglo-Saxon England. Anglo-Saxon England42. 183–215. 10.1017/S0263675113000100
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263675113000100 [Google Scholar]
33. Wilmet, Marc
    1976 Oui, si et non en français moderne. Le français moderne44, 229–251.
    [Google Scholar]