Presupposed evaluation in environmental argumentative discourse

References

1. BBC News
   BBC News5January 2013 Viewpoints: fracking’s risks and benefitsAvailable online atwww.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-20758673NT
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bednarek, Monika
   2006 Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bednarek, Monika
   2008 Emotion talk across corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230285712
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712 [Google Scholar]
4. Benamara, Farah, Maite Taboada & Yannick Mathieu
   2017 Evaluative language beyond bags of words: Linguistic insights and computational applications. Computational Linguistics43(1). 201–264. 10.1162/COLI_a_00278
   https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00278 [Google Scholar]
5. Colomina-Almiñana, Juan J.
   2018 Pragmatic presuppositions and articulated constituents. Lingua206. 112–126. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.02.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.02.003 [Google Scholar]
6. Davies, Anna R.
   2006 Nature in place: Public visions of nature-society relationships in the UK. InJ. G. Riyan, Rob Van den Born, H. J. Lenders & Wouter T. de Groot (eds.), Visions of nature, 85–106. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst
   2003 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511616389
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389 [Google Scholar]
8. Gerritsen, Susanne
   2001 Unexpressed premises. InFrans H. van Eemeren (ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, 51–79. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Johnson, Ralph H. & Blair J. Anthony
   2006 Logical self-defence. New York, NY: International Debate Education Association.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2004 An introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn.London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hommerberg, Charlotte
    2015 Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining Appraisal and argumentation analysis. Text and Talk35(2). 155–175. 10.1515/text‑2014‑0033
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2014-0033 [Google Scholar]
12. Hommerberg, Charlotte & Alexanne, Don
    2015 Appraisal and the language of wine appreciation: A critical discussion of the potential of the appraisal framework as a tool to analyse specialised genres. Functions of Language22(2). 161–191. 10.1075/fol.22.2.01hom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.2.01hom [Google Scholar]
13. Hood, Susan & J. R. Martin
    2007 Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, vol.2, 739–764. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hunston, Susan
    1989 Evaluation in experimental research articles. Birmingham: University of Birmingham PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hunston, Susan
    2000 Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. InSusan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 176–206.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson
    (eds.) 2000 Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hyland, Ken
    2002 What do they mean? Questions in academic writing. Text22(4). 259–557. 10.1515/text.2002.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.021 [Google Scholar]
18. Labov, William & Joshua Valetzky
    1967 Narrative analysis. InJune Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lemke, Jay
    1998 Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language5(1). 33–56. 10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem [Google Scholar]
20. Kaltenbacher, Martin
    2006 Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: The emotive andthe factual. A corpus analysis within the framework of appraisal. InGeoff Thompson & Susan Hunston (eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections, 269–292. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Macken-Horarik, Mary & Anne Isaac
    2014 Appraising appraisal. InGeoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 67–92.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
    2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
23. Pounds, Gabrina
    2005 Writer’s argumentative attitude: A contrastive analysis of Letters to the Editor in English and Italian. Pragmatics15(1). 49–88. 10.1075/prag.15.1.03pou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.15.1.03pou [Google Scholar]
24. Pounds, Gabrina
    2011 “This property offers much character and charm”: Evaluation in the discourse of online property advertising. Text and Talk31(2). 195–220. 10.1515/text.2011.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.009 [Google Scholar]
25. Thompson, Geoff
    2014 Affect and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls: Refining the Appraisal model. InGeoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 47–66.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Thompson, Geoff & Laura Alba-Juez
    (eds.) 2014 Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242 [Google Scholar]
27. Toulmin, Stephen E., Richard Rieke & Allan S. Janik
    1979 An introduction to reasoning. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Toulmin, Stephen E.
    2003 The uses of argument. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005 [Google Scholar]
29. Vargas, Andrès, Michael Howes & Nicholas Rohde
    2017 The problem of inclusion in deliberative environmental evaluation. Environmental values26. 157–176. 10.3197/096327117X14847335385472
    https://doi.org/10.3197/096327117X14847335385472 [Google Scholar]
30. Walton, Douglas
    2009 Argumentation theory: A very short introduction. InGuillermo Simari & Iyad Rahwan (eds.), Argumentation in artificial intelligence, 1–22. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98197‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_1 [Google Scholar]
31. White, Peter R. R.
    2006 Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse: A new framework for analysis. InInger Lassen, Jeanne Strunck & Torben Vestergaard (eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image, 37–67. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.18.05whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.18.05whi [Google Scholar]
32. Wilson, Matthew A. & Richard B. Howarth
    2002 Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: Establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecological Economics1. 431–443. 10.1016/S0921‑8009(02)00092‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00092-7 [Google Scholar]
33. Wu, Siew Mei & Allison Desmond
    2005 Evaluative expressions in analytical arguments: Aspects of appraisal in assigned English language essays. Journal of Applied Linguistics2(1). 105–127.
    [Google Scholar]