Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics

References

1. Bartlett, Tom
   2016 Multiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of mode. InWendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 166–183. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137402868_7
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402868_7 [Google Scholar]
2. Bartlett, Tom
   2017 Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics. InTom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 375–390.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bartlett, Tom
   2018 Rethinking (context of) culture in Systemic Functional Linguistics. InAkila Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics, 26–46. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315299877‑3
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315299877-3 [Google Scholar]
4. Bartlett, Tom & Gerard, O’Grady
   (eds.) 2017 The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315413891
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315413891 [Google Scholar]
5. Blommaert, Jan
   2007 Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics4(1). 1–19. 10.1515/IP.2007.001
   https://doi.org/10.1515/IP.2007.001 [Google Scholar]
6. Blommaert, Jan, Eline Westinen & Sirpa Leppänen
   2015 Further notes on sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics12(1). 119–127. 10.1515/ip‑2015‑0005
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
7. Bowcher, Wendy L.
   2013 Material action as choice in field. InLise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 318–341. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077.020
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.020 [Google Scholar]
8. Bowcher, Wendy L.
   2014 Issues in developing unified systems for contextual field and mode. Functions of Language21(2). 176–209. 10.1075/fol.21.2.02bow
   https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.2.02bow [Google Scholar]
9. Bowcher, Wendy L.
   2018 The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics5(5). 10.1186/s40554‑018‑0055‑y
   https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0055-y [Google Scholar]
10. Bühler, Karl
    1934 Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Butt, David G. & Rebekah Wegener
    2007 The work of concepts: Context and metafunction in the systemic functional model. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, Volume 2, 589–618. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Clarke, Benjamin
    2012 Do patterns of ellipsis in text support systemic functional linguistics’ ‘context-metafunction hook-up’ hypothesis? A corpus-based approach. Cardiff: Cardiff University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin
    1992 Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ervin-Tripp, Susan
    1996 Context in language. InDan Isaac Slobin, Julie Gerhadt, Amy Kiratzis & Jiansheng Guo (eds.), Social interaction, social context and language, 21–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Firth, J. R.
    [1950] 1957 Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady
    (eds.) 2013 Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077 [Google Scholar]
17. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1967 Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics3(1). 37–81. 10.1017/S0022226700012949
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949 [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1978 Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Maryland, MD: University Park Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1985 Part A. InM. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 3–49. 10.2307/3011108
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3011108 [Google Scholar]
20. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1991 [2007] The notion of ‘context’ in language education. InJonathan Webster (ed.). Language and education. Volume 9 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 269–290. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1992 How do you mean?InMartin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 20–35. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
23. Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1985 Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1981 What’s going on: A dynamic view of context in language. InJames E. Copeland & Philip W. Davis (eds.), The seventh LACUS forum 1980, 106–121. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1985 Part B. InM. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 51–121.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    [1992] 2009 Rationality in everyday talk: From process to system. InJonathan J. Webster (ed.), Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics. Collected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2, 309–352. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1995 The conception of context in text. InPeter Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic Functional perspectives: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 183–282. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    1999 Speaking with reference to context. InMohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 219–232. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.169.11has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.169.11has [Google Scholar]
29. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2013 Choice, system, realisation: Describing language as meaning potential. InLise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett and Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 269–299. 10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.018 [Google Scholar]
30. Hasan, Ruqaiya
    2014 Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions and semantics. Functional linguistics1(9). 1–54. 10.1186/s40554‑014‑0009‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-014-0009-y [Google Scholar]
31. Kretzschmar, William A.
    2015 Language and complex systems. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781316179017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316179017 [Google Scholar]
32. Lemke, Jay
    1984 Semiotics and education. InMonographs, working papers and prepublications of the Toronto Semiotic Circle, No.2, 23–62. Toronto: Victoria University.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lemke, Jay
    1992 New challenges for Systemic-Functional Linguistics: Dialect diversity and language change. Network18. 61–68.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lemke, Jay
    2015 Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. InPeter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 589–616. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑9404‑6_27
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_27 [Google Scholar]
35. Malinowski, Bronislaw
    1923 The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Supplement toC. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards, The meaning of meaning, 10th edn. 1966), 296–336. New York, NY: Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Malinowski, Bronislaw
    1935 Coral gardens and their magic, Volume II. New York, NY: American Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Martin, J. R.
    1992 English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
38. Martin, J. R.
    2014 Evolving systemic functional linguistics: Beyond the clause. Functional Linguistics1(3). Available online atwww.functionallinguistics.com/content/1/1/3. 10.1186/2196‑419X‑1‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-419X-1-3 [Google Scholar]
39. Martin, J. R. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    1991 Systemic typology and topology. InFrances Christie (ed.), Literacy in social processes: Papers from the inaugural Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics conference, 345–383. Darwin: Centre for Studies of Language in Education, Northern Territory University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Moore, Alison Rotha
    2020 Progress and tensions in modelling register as a semantic configuration. Language, Context and Text2(1). 22–58. 10.1075/langct.00020.moo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00020.moo [Google Scholar]
41. Morris, Desmond
    1967 The Naked Ape. London: Jonathan Cape.
    [Google Scholar]
42. O’Donnell, Mick
    2019 Continuing issues in SFL. InGeoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), 204–229. 10.1017/9781316337936.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.010 [Google Scholar]
43. Saussure de, Ferdinand
    1960 Cours de Linguistique Générale, 3rd edn. (eds.Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye). Paris: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Taverniers, Miriam
    2019 Semantics. InGeoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), 55–91.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Thompson, Geoff, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal
    (eds.) 2019 The Cambridge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316337936
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936 [Google Scholar]
46. Wegener, Rebekah
    2011 Parameters of context: From theory to model and application. Sidney: Macquarie University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]