1887
image of From dynamic modal to conditional protasis connective
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The grammaticalization literature has not demonstrated convincingly how, if at all, dynamic modals may develop into conditional protasis connectives. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative evidence from Chinese, this paper hypothesizes that such a directionality may arise through univerbation between dynamic modals and protasis connectives (e.g. ‘if’ + ‘be able to’ > ‘if’). Furthermore, this paper suggests that functional compatibility in terms of performativity may explain why dynamic modals tend to grammaticalize into connectives in pre-established conditional protases, while deontic and epistemic modals do so in main clauses.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.20030.kuo
2021-04-07
2021-04-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian
    1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology2(1). 79–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Breitbarth, Anne
    2019 Should a conditional marker arise … The diachronic development of conditional sollte in German. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4(1). 21. doi:  10.5334/gjgl.599
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.599 [Google Scholar]
  3. Breitbarth, Anne, Sara Delva & Torsten Leuschner
    2016 A (very) imperfect sandwich: English should, German sollte, Dutch mocht/moest as grammaticalizing markers of conditionality. Journal of Germanic Linguistics28(4). 282–316. 10.1017/S1470542716000143
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542716000143 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca
    1987 The evolution of future meaning. InAnna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 109–122. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.48.09byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.09byb [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Byloo, Pieter & Jan Nuyts
    2014 Meaning change in the Dutch core modals: (Inter)subjectification in a grammatical paradigm. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia46(1). 85–116. 10.1080/03740463.2014.955978
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.955978 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, Li-Li
    2009 From restrictive adverbs to sufficient conditional conjunctions. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies39(3). 355–388.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, Miao-Hsia
    1996 The grammaticalization of BEH in Taiwanese Hokkien. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences26(1/2). 39–59. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2009 Metaphorization and metonymization: the development of verbs of volition in Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics7(1). 53–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chappell, Hilary & Alain Peyraube
    2016 Modality and mood in Sinitic. InJan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 296–329. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cinque, Guglielmo
    1999Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Croft, William
    2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dancygier, Barbara
    1998Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
    2005Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486760
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486760 [Google Scholar]
  16. Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed
    2001Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110851748
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851748 [Google Scholar]
  17. Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit
    2002 Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft21. 151–195. 10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.2002.21.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  18. Diewald, Gabriele
    2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. InIlse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
  19. Dik, Simon
    1997The theory of Functional Grammar, part 1: The structure of the clause, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goldberg, Adele
    2019Explain me this: Creativity, competition and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Guo, Jianshen
    1995 The interactional basis of the Mandarin modal negn ‘can’. InJoan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 205–238. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.10guo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.10guo [Google Scholar]
  22. Hengeveld, Kees
    1989 Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics25. 127–157. 10.1017/S0022226700012123
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012123 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hengeveld, Kees, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz
    2017 A functional perspective on the grammaticalization of tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality. InKees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds.), The grammaticalization of tense, aspect and evidentiality: A functional perspective, 1–12. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110519389
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110519389 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hilpert, Martin
    2010 What can synchronic gradience tell us about reanalysis? Verb-first conditionals in written German and Swedish. InElizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 181–201. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.90.10hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.10hil [Google Scholar]
  25. Hsu, Hsun-Ming, Yu-Fang Wang & Kai-Ming Hu
    2015 Direct and indirect conditionals: A corpus-based study of Chinese yaoshi and yaobushi in spoken and written discourse. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics. 13(2). 31–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jiang, Shaoyu
    2013 Cíyì yǎnbiàn sān lì ‘Three examples of semantic change’. InGuangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese Linguistics and beyond, vol.1, 321–344. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuteva, Tania
    2001Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316479704
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuo, Yueh Hsin
    2020Late-stage grammatical change in Chinese: A constructional account. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. . Forthcoming a. From deontic modality to conditionality: A diachronic investigation into in Classical Chinese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics22(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. . Forthcoming b. Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese: A constructionalization account. Diachronica.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Ming
    2016Hanyu Zhudongci De Lishi Yanbian Yanjiu ‘A study of historical development of Chinese Auxiliary Verbs’. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, Renzhi
    2004 Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Antwerp: University of Antwerp PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu, Cheng-Hui
    2010 On the functions of the protasis markers gou, rou, and shi in Pre-Qin Chinese. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies40(2). 221–244.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lyons, John
    1977Semantics, vol.2. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ma, Beijia
    2002 ‘Yao’ de yufahua ‘the grammaticalization of yao’. Linguistics Study4. 81–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Narrog, Heiko
    2009Modality in Japanese: The layered structure of the clause and hierarchies of functional categories. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.109
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2012Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nuyts, Jan
    1993 Epistemic modal adverbs and adjectives and the layered representation of conceptual and linguistic structure. Linguistics31. 933–69. 10.1515/ling.1993.31.5.933
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1993.31.5.933 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2001Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  42. Ōta, Tatsuo
    1958Chugokugo rekishi bunpō ‘A historical grammar of modern Chinese’. Tokyo: Kōnan Shoin.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Palmer, Frank R.
    1990Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Peyraube, Alain & Li Ming
    2012 The semantic historical development of modal verbs of volition in Chinese. InJanet Zhiqun Xing (ed.), Newest trends in the study of grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, 149–167. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110253009.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253009.149 [Google Scholar]
  45. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  46. Rychlý, Pavel
    2008 A lexicographer-friendly association score. Workshop on recent advances in Slavonic natural language processing (RASLAN)2. 6–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schmid, Hans-Jörg
    2020The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814771.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
    2003 Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8(2). 209–43. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  49. Sweetser, Eve
    1988 Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. The annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society14. 389–405. 10.3765/bls.v14i0.1774
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1774 [Google Scholar]
  50. 1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  51. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1985 Conditional markers. InJohn Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 289–307. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.6.14clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.14clo [Google Scholar]
  52. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher
    2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Tsang, Chui Lim
    1981A semantic study of modal auxiliary verbs in Chinese. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Van den Nest, Daan
    2010 Should conditionals be emergent… Asyndetic subordination in German and English as a challenge to grammaticalization research. InAn Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete, Kristin Davidse & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research, 95–136. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.94.05van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.94.05van [Google Scholar]
  55. Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
    1997Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  56. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
    2001 Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics33(10). 1505–1528. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00029‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00029-7 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wiemer, Björn & Walter Bisang
    2004 What makes grammaticalization? An appraisal of its components and its fringes. InWalter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? – A look from its fringes and its components, 3–20. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu, Hsueh-ju
    2018A study of modal verbs in Pre-Qin Chinese. Shanghai: Zhongxi Shuju.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Yu, Hsueh-ying
    1998 Some speculations on the semantic change of Chinese modal verb ‘Yao’. Wenshan Review1(2). 161–175.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.20030.kuo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.20030.kuo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error