Contrast marking variation in Romance and Germanic languages

References

1. Andorno, Cecilia & Claudia Crocco
   2018 In search for polarity contrast marking in Italian: A contribution from echo replies. InChristine Dimroth & Stefan Sudhoff (eds.), The grammatical realization of polarity contrast, 256–287. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/la.249.09and
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.249.09and [Google Scholar]
2. Andorno, Cecilia & Giuseppina Turco
   2015 Embedding additive particles in the sentence information structure: How L2 learners find their way through positional and prosodic patterns. Linguistik Online71(2). 57–79. 10.13092/lo.71.1778
   https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.71.1778 [Google Scholar]
3. Benazzo, Sandra & Cecilia Andorno
   2010 Discourse cohesion and topic discontinuity in native and learner production. Changing topic entities on maintained predicates. InLeah Roberts, Martin Howard, Muiris Ó Laoire & David Singleton (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook101, 92–118. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Benazzo, Sandra, Cecilia Andorno, Cedric Patin & Grazia Interlandi
   2012 Perspective discursive et influence translinguistique: Exprimer le contraste d’entité en français et en italien L2. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition3(2). 173–201. 10.1075/lia.3.2.02ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.3.2.02ben [Google Scholar]
5. Cruschina, Silvio
   2021 The greater the contrast, the greater the potential: On the effects of Focus in syntax. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics6(1). 1–30. 10.5334/gjgl.1100
   https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1100 [Google Scholar]
6. Dimroth, Christine
   2002 Topics, assertions, and additive words: How L2 learners get from information structure to target-language syntax. Linguistics40(4). 891–923. 10.1515/ling.2002.033
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2002.033 [Google Scholar]
7. Dimroth, Christine, Cecilia Andorno, Sandra Benazzo & Josie Verhagen
   2010 Given claims about new topics. How Romance and Germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics42(12). 3328–3344. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.009 [Google Scholar]
8. Fetzer, Anita
   2018 The encoding and signalling of discourse relations in argumentative discourse: Evidence across production formats. InMaría de los Ángeles Gómez González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds.), The construction of discourse as verbal interaction, 13–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.296.02fet
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.296.02fet [Google Scholar]
9. Fetzer, Anita & Augustin Speyer
   2012 Discourse relations in English and German discourse: Local and not-so-local constraints. Intercultural Pragmatics9(4). 413–452. 10.1515/ip‑2012‑0025
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2012-0025 [Google Scholar]
10. Gussenhoven, Carlos
    1983 Focus, mode and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics91. 377–417. 10.1017/S0022226700007799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007799 [Google Scholar]
11. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    1998 La grammaticalisation de l’interaction ou Pour une approche polysémique de l’adverbe bien. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique41. 111–138.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hohle, Tilman
    1992 Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. InJoachim Jacobs (ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑663‑12176‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12176-3_5 [Google Scholar]
13. Krifka, Manfred
    2007 Basic notions of information structure. InCaroline Féry & Manfred Krifka (eds.), The notions of information structure61, 13–55. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Molnar, Valéria
    2002 Contrast from a contrastive perspective. InHilde Hasselgård, Stig Johansson, Bergljot Behrens & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds.), Information structure in a cross-linguistic perspective, 147–161. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004334250_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334250_010 [Google Scholar]
15. Poletto, Cecilia & Raffaella Zanuttini
    2013 Emphasis as reduplication: Evidence from sì che/no che sentences. Lingua1281. 124–141. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.016 [Google Scholar]
16. Repp, Sophie
    2010 Defining ‘contrast’ as an information-structural notion in grammar. Lingua120(6). 1333–1345. 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.04.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.04.006 [Google Scholar]
17. Stalnaker, Robert
    2002 Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy251. 701–721. 10.1023/A:1020867916902
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902 [Google Scholar]
18. Sudhoff, Stefan
    (2012): Negation der Negation. Verumfokus und die niederländische Polaritätspartikel wel. In: Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft181, 105–136.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Turco, Giuseppina
    2014 Contrasting opposite polarity in Germanic and Romance languages. Nijmegen: MPI Series in Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Turco, Giuseppina, Bettina Braun & Christine Dimroth
    2014 When contrasting polarity, the Dutch use particles, Germans intonation. Journal of Pragmatics621. 94–106. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.020 [Google Scholar]
21. Turco, Giuseppina, Christine Dimroth & Bettina Braun
    2013 Intonational means to mark verum focus in German and French. Language and Speech56(4). 461–491. 10.1177/0023830912460506
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830912460506 [Google Scholar]
22. Turco, Giuseppina, Christine Dimroth & Bettina Braun
    2015 Prosodic and lexical marking of contrast in L2 Italian. Second Language Research31(4). 465–491. 10.1177/0267658315579537
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658315579537 [Google Scholar]