1887
Volume 29, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Using the methodology of Grounded Theory, this study aims to identify and analyze the perceptions and functions of self-denigration in dissertation defenses. The data comprises transcripts of two focus group discussions and the disputation sections of a corpus of 53 applied linguistics doctoral defense sessions gathered from 14 Iranian state universities between 2019 and 2021. The findings suggest that self-denigration depends to a great extent on the role of the participants in a disputation, and it is used before or after a criticism or a response to criticism. The analysis of the data revealed that self-denigration as a sign of respectfulness and modesty in a defense contributes to social decorum, diffidence, coercive self-deprecation, contrived modesty, or flamboyance. This study highlights the importance of self-denigration in the oral academic discourse of EFL defense sessions and has pedagogical implications for oral academic literacy practices.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.22021.may
2022-11-01
2022-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arundale, Robert B.
    2006 Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture2(2). 193–217. 10.1515/PR.2006.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Birks, Melanie & Jane Mills
    2015Grounded theory: A practical guide, 2nd edn.Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blickle, Gerhard, Corinna Diekmann, Paula B. Schneider, Yvonne Kalthöfer & James K. Summers
    2012 When modesty wins: Impression management through modesty, political skill, and career success – a two-study investigation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology21(6). 899–922. 10.1080/1359432X.2011.603900
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.603900 [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown, Robyn
    2019Self-defeating vs. self-deprecating humor: A case of being laughed at vs. laughed with?Melbourne: Swinburne University of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1978Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Charmaz, Kathy
    2014Constructing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Rong
    1993 Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics20(1). 49–75. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90106‑Y
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90106-Y [Google Scholar]
  8. Creswell, John W.
    2012Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th edn. Boston: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Daneshvar, Maryam, Ali Asghar Kargar & Arash Zareian
    2017 A pragmatic analysis of the interactions in MA TEFL students’ defense sessions. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research4(7). 217–235.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dendenne, Boudjemaa
    2021 Compliments, self-praise, and self-denigration among nonnative English users in an online setting. TESL-EJ25(1). 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dayter, Daria
    2014 Self-praise in microblogging. Journal of Pragmatics611. 91–102. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.021 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2018 Self-praise online and offline: The hallmark speech act of social media?Internet Pragmatics1(1). 184–203. 10.1075/ip.00009.day
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00009.day [Google Scholar]
  13. 2021 Dealing with interactionally risky speech acts in simultaneous interpreting: The case of self-praise. Journal of Pragmatics1741. 28–42. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.010 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dobson, Stephen
    2018Assessing the viva in higher education: chasing moments of truth. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑64016‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64016-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Don, Zuraidah Mohd & Ahmad Izadi
    2011 Relational connection and separation in Iranian dissertation defenses. Journal of Pragmatics43(15). 3782–3792. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.09.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.09.010 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2013 Interactionally achieving face in criticism criticism-response exchanges. Language Communication33(3). 221–231. 10.1016/j.langcom.2013.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Drisko, James & Tina Maschi
    2015Content analysis. New York: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Glaser, Barney
    1992Basics of Grounded Theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goffman, Erving
    1955 On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry18(3). 213–231. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics14(2). 237–257. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  21. Hadley, Gregory
    2017Grounded theory in applied linguistics research: A practical guide. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315758671
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758671 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki & Tsunao Ogino
    1986 Universals of linguistics politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics101. 347–371. 10.1016/0378‑2166(86)90006‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(86)90006-8 [Google Scholar]
  23. Izadi, Ahmad
    2013 Politeness in spoken review genre: Viva voce context. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities21(4). 1327–1346.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2016 Over-politeness in Persian professional interactions. Journal of Pragmatics1021. 13–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2017a Culture-generality and culture-specificity of face: Insights from argumentative talk in Iranian dissertation defenses. Pragmatics and Society8(2). 208–230. 10.1075/ps.8.2.03iza
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.03iza [Google Scholar]
  26. 2017b Mixed messages in criticisms in Iranian PhD dissertation defenses. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice11(3). 270–291. 10.1558/japl.35211
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.35211 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2017c Turn-taking, preference, and face in criticism responses. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics8(1). 72–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Izadi, Ahmad & Alireza Jalilifar
    2010 Politeness in LAP assessment: Dissertation defense sessions in focus. Iranian Journal of TEFLL2(2). 71–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jalilifar, Alireza & Nadia Mayahi
    2022 Referral for resubmission: Scholarly expectations of EFL applied linguistics doctoral defense sessions. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10.1515/eujal‑2021‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2021-0009 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones, Ronald M., Lars Hansen, Valentina Moskvina, David Kingdon & Douglas Turkington
    2010 The relationship between self-esteem and psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia: A longitudinal study. Psychosis2(3). 218–226. 10.1080/17522431003602430
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17522431003602430 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2009 Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments. Journal of Pragmatics41(8). 1611–1635. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jucker, Andreas H., Gerold Schneider, Irma Taavitsainen & Barb Breustedt
    2008 Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research. InAndreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), 273–294. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.15juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.15juc [Google Scholar]
  33. Kádár, Daniel Z.
    2013Relational rituals and communication: Ritual interaction in groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230393059
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230393059 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2019 Politeness and impoliteness in Chinese discourse. InChris Shei (ed.), The Routledge handbook of Chinese discourse analysis, 203–215. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315213705‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213705-14 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kádár, Daniel Z. & Michael Haugh
    2013Understanding politeness. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kádár, Daniel Z. & Ling Zhou
    2021 Self-denigration in 21st century Chinese. Journal of Politeness Research17(2). 265–289. 10.1515/pr‑2018‑0043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2018-0043 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim, Myung-Hee
    2014 Why self-deprecating? Achieving ‘oneness’ in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics691. 82–98. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  38. Krueger, Richard A. & Mary Anne Casey
    2015Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, 5th edn. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
    1990Talking power: The politics of language in our lives. Glasgow: HarperCollins.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Leech, Geoffrey
    2007 Politeness: Is there an East-West divide?Journal of Politeness Research3(2). 167–206. 10.1515/PR.2007.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2014The pragmatics of politeness. New York: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Locher, Miriam A.
    2008 Relational work, politeness and identity construction. InGerd Antos, Eija Ventola & Tilo Weber (eds.), Handbooks of Applied Linguistics: Interpersonal Communication, 509–540. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110211399.4.509
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211399.4.509 [Google Scholar]
  43. Locher, Miriam A. & Richard J. Watts
    2005Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research1(1). 9–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mayahi, Nadia & Alireza Jalilifar
    2022 Self-denigration in doctoral defense sessions: Scale development and validation. ESP Today10(1). 2–24. 10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2022.10.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mežek, Špela & John M. Swales
    2016 PhD defences and vivas. InKen Hyland & Philip Shaw (eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes, 361–375. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Murray, Rowena
    2003 Students’ questions and their implications for the viva. Quality Assurance in Education11(2). 109–113. 10.1108/09684880310471533
    https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310471533 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ohashi, Jun
    2013Thanking and politeness in Japanese: Balancing acts in interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137009876
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137009876 [Google Scholar]
  48. Owens, Timothy J., & Adam B. King
    2001 Measuring self-esteem: Race, ethnicity, and gender considered. InTimothy J. Owens, Sheldon Stryker & Norman Goodman (eds.), Extending self-esteem theory and research: Sociological and psychological currents, 56–84. New York: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511527739.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527739.004 [Google Scholar]
  49. Page, Ruth
    2019 Self-denigration and the mixed messages of ‘ugly’ selfies in Instagram. Internet Pragmatics2(2). 173–205. 10.1075/ip.00035.pag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00035.pag [Google Scholar]
  50. Preuss, Gregory S. & Mark D. Alicke
    2017 My worst faults and misdeeds: Self-criticism and self-enhancement can co-exist. Self and Identity16(6). 645–663. 10.1080/15298868.2017.1296019
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1296019 [Google Scholar]
  51. Recski, Leonardo
    2005 Interpersonal engagement in academic spoken discourse: A functional account of dissertation defenses. English for Specific Purposes24(1). 5–23. 10.1016/j.esp.2003.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Reichertz, Jo
    2019 Abduction: The logic of discovery in Grounded Theory – An updated review. InAntony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (eds.), The Sage handbook of current developments in Grounded Theory, 259–281. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sharifian, Farzad
    2003 On cultural conceptualization. Journal of Cognition and Culture3(3). 187–207. 10.1163/156853703322336625
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703322336625 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2005 Persian cultural schema of shekasteh-nafsi: A study of compliment responses in Persian and Anglo-Australian speakers. Pragmatics & Cognition13(2). 337–361. 10.1075/pc.13.2.05sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.13.2.05sha [Google Scholar]
  55. 2008 Cultural schemes in L1 and L2 compliment responses: A study of Persian-speaking learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research4(1). 55–80. 10.1515/PR.2008.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2008.003 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2017Cultural linguistics: Cultural conceptualizations and language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.8 [Google Scholar]
  57. Speer, Susan A.
    2019 Reconsidering self-deprecation as communication practice. British Journal of Social Psychology58(4). 806–828. 10.1111/bjso.12329
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12329 [Google Scholar]
  58. Spencer-Oatey, Helen
    2002 Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics341. 529–545. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00039‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
  59. (ed.) 2008Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 2008 (Im)politeness and rapport. InHelen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), 11–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Spencer-Oatey, Helen, Patrick Ng & Li Dong
    2008 British and Chinese reactions to compliment responses. InHelen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), 95–117.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Suh, Kyung-Hee
    2010 A contrastive study of compliment responses of Korean, Chinese and English speakers. Yengmiyenkwu (English and American Studies)221. 131–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Swales, John
    2004Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tang, Chen-Hsin & Grace Qiao Zhang
    2009 A contrastive study of compliment responses among Australian English and Mandarin Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics411. 325–345. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.019 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tie, Ylona Chun, Melanie Birks & Karen Francis
    2019 Grounded Theory: A design framework for novice researchers. Sage Open Medicine71. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Walkinshaw, Ian, Nathaniel Mitchell & Sophiaan Subhan
    2019 Self-denigration as a relational strategy in lingua franca talk: Asian English Speaker. Journal of Pragmatics1391. 40–51. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.013 [Google Scholar]
  67. Yu, Changrong
    2013 Two interactional functions of self-mockery in everyday English conversations: A multimodal analysis. Journal of Pragmatics50(1). 1–22. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  68. Zare, Javad
    2016 Self-mockery: A study of Persian multi-party interactions. Text & Talk36 (6). 789–812. 10.1515/text‑2016‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0034 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.22021.may
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.22021.may
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Academic discourse; Doctoral defense; EFL; Grounded theory; Politeness; Self-denigration
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error