The Structure of the English NP
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adamson, Sylvia
    2000A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Olga Fischer , Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.53.04ada
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.04ada [Google Scholar]
  2. Adamson, Sylvia & Victorina González-Díaz
    2009 History and structure of the English noun phrase: Introduction. Transactions of the Philological Society107. 255–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2009.01229.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2009.01229.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Bache, Carl
    2000Essentials of mastering English: A concise grammar. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110825985
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110825985 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boas, Hans & Ivan Sag
    2012Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse
    2003 Adjectives of comparison: The grammaticalization of their attribute uses into postdeterminer and classifier uses. Folia Linguistica37(3/4). 269–317. doi: 10.1515/flin.2003.37.3‑4.269
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2003.37.3-4.269 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brems, Lieselotte
    2011The layering of size noun and type noun constructions in English. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110252927
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252927 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, Joan
    2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  8. Denison, David
    2002 History of the S ort of construction family. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Construction Grammar , Helsinki, 6–8 September 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2006 Category change and gradience in the determiner system. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 279–304. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470757048.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757048.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Smet, Hendrik
    2012 The course of actualization. Language88. 601–633. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fanego, Teresa
    2004 On reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change: The rise and development of English verbal gerunds. Diachronica21. 5–55. doi: 10.1075/dia.21.1.03fan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21.1.03fan [Google Scholar]
  12. Fillmore, Charles
    2003Form and meaning in language. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fillmore, Charles & Paul Kay
    1993Construction grammar course book. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gehweiler, Elke
    2011The grammaticalization of private adjectives: Present-day uses and diachronic development. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghesquière, Lobke & Freek Van de Velde
    2011 A corpus-based account of the development of English such and Dutch zulk: Identification, intensification and (inter)subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics22. 765–797. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2011.028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.028 [Google Scholar]
  16. Halliday, M.A.K
    1976[1964] English system networks. In Gunther Kress (ed.), Halliday: System and function in language, 101–135. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1994[1985]An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn [1st edn]. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hilpert, Martin
    2013Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  20. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
    2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kaltenböck, Gunther , Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva
    2011 On thetical grammar. Studies in Language35(4). 848–893. doi: 10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal [Google Scholar]
  22. Keizer, Evelien
    2007The English noun phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627699
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627699 [Google Scholar]
  23. Langacker, Ronald W
    1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Michaelis, Laura
    2009 Sign-based construction grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 155–176. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum , Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sinclair, John
    2004Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
    (eds.) 2010Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.90
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Van de Velde, Freek , Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
    2013 Introduction: On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language37(3). 473–489. doi: 10.1075/sl.37.3.01int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.01int [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Langendonck, Willy
    1999 Neurolinguistic and syntactic evidence for basic level meaning in proper names. Functions of Language6. 95–138. doi: 10.1075/fol.6.1.04van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.6.1.04van [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error