Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


In recent years, consensus has been growing that certain co-speech gestures must be incorporated in grammatical theory. Contrary to traditional beliefs, gestural expression has been found to be systematic in various ways, to exhibit some degree of compositional structure and to be to a certain extent language-specific. Most current work on the gesture-grammar interface is, nonetheless, rather programmatic in character or lacks an appropriate theoretical framework. This paper shows that Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG) provides a promising model for understanding the grammar-gesture relationship in a more comprehensive and detailed way than has thus far been achieved. It first evaluates how a FDG perspective on language structure aligns with the ways gestures have been studied. Then it demonstrates that various types of co-speech manual gestures can be classified (perhaps even exhaustively) according to the pragmatic and semantic layers recognized in FDG. On the basis of this survey, a first sketch of a multi-channel (speech-gesture) version of FDG’s architecture is presented. Finally, some challenges are put forward that arise when taking the multimodal grammar enterprise seriously. Altogether, the content of this paper suggests that a multimodal perspective on grammar can be mutually beneficial for functionally oriented linguists and gesture researchers.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alahverdzhieva, Katya
    2013Alignment of speech and co-speech gesture in a constraint-based grammar. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allwood, Jens
    2002 Bodily communication dimensions of expression and content. In Inger Karlsson , Björn Granström & David House (eds.), Multimodality in language and speech systems, 7–26. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑2367‑1_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2367-1_2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrén, Mats
    2010Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Lund: Lund University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Anstey, Matthew P
    2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: Multifunctional problems and constructional solutions. Linguistics46(4). 831–859. doi: 10.1515/LING.2008.027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.027 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bavelas, Janet B. , Nicole Chovil , Douglas A. Lawrie & Allan Wade
    1992 Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes15(4). 469–489. doi: 10.1080/01638539209544823
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beattie, Geoffrey & Heather Shovelton
    1999 Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology18(4). 438–462. doi: 10.1177/0261927X99018004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018004005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergmann, Kirsten & Stefan Kopp
    2010 Systematicity and idiosyncrasy in iconic gesture use: Empirical analysis and computational modeling. In Stefan Kopp & Ipke Wachsmuth (eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction, 182–194. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑12553‑9_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12553-9_16 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bressem, Jana
    2012Repetitions in gesture: Structures, functions, and cognitive aspects. Frankfurt (Oder): European University Viadrina PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Butler, Christopher S
    2008 Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of language. Language Sciences30(1). 1–30. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  10. Calbris, Geneviève
    1990The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2008 From left to right: Coverbal gestures and their symbolic use of space. In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 27–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.3.05cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.05cal [Google Scholar]
  12. Chomsky, Noam
    1983 Noam Chomsky’s views on the psychology of language and thought. In Robert W. Rieber (ed.), Dialogues on the psychology of language and thought, 29–63. New York, NY: Plenum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cienki, Alan
    2005 Image schemas and gesture. In Beate Hampe & Joseph E. Grady (eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, 421–441. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110197532.5.421
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.5.421 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012 Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. In Krzysztof Kosecki & Janusz Badio (eds.), Cognitive processes in language, 149–158. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2015 Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition7(4). 499–514. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2015.20
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.20 [Google Scholar]
  16. Connolly, John H
    2010 Accommodating multimodality in Functional Discourse Grammar. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar83. 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2014 The contextual component within a dynamic implementation of the FDG model: Structure and interaction. Pragmatics24(2). 229–248. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.2.03con
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.2.03con [Google Scholar]
  18. Cooperrider, Kensy & Rafael Núñez
    2012 Nose-pointing: Notes on a facial gesture of Papua New Guinea. Gesture12(2). 103–129. doi: 10.1075/gest.12.2.01coo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.2.01coo [Google Scholar]
  19. De Ruiter, Jan-Peter
    2000 The production of gesture and speech. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture, 331–357. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Debras, Camille & Alan Cienki
    2012 Some uses of head tilts and shoulder shrugs during human interaction, and their relation to stancetaking. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom) , 932–937.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dik, Simon C
    1986 On the notion ‘Functional Explanation’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics1. 11–52. doi: 10.1075/bjl.1.02dik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.1.02dik [Google Scholar]
  22. Duncan, Susan D
    2002 Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture2(2). 183–206. doi: 10.1075/gest.2.2.04dun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.04dun [Google Scholar]
  23. Efron, David
    1972Gesture, race and culture. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ekman, Paul & Wallace V. Friesen
    1969 Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry32. 88–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Enfield, Nicholas J
    2001 Lip-pointing: A discussion of form and function with reference to data from Laos. Gesture1. 185–211. doi: 10.1075/gest.1.2.06enf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.2.06enf [Google Scholar]
  26. 2004 On linear segmentation and combinatorics in co-speech gesture: A symmetry-dominance construction in Lao fish trap descriptions. Semiotica149. 57–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2009The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511576737
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576737 [Google Scholar]
  28. Everett, Daniel
    . In preparation. Sculpting language: A review of the David McNeill Gesture Trilogy. Available online atling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002084.
  29. Feyereisen, Pierre , Michèle van de Wiele & Fabienne Dubois
    1988 The meaning of gestures: What can be understood without speech?European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology8. 3–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Firbas, Jan
    1964 On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux linguistiques de Prague1. 267–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fricke, Ellen
    2008Grundlagen einer multimodalen Grammatik des Deutschen. Frankfurt (Oder): European University Viadrina PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2009 Multimodal attribution: How gestures are syntactically integrated into spoken language. Paper presented at theInternational workshop on Gesture and Speech in Interaction (GESPIN), Poznań.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2012Grammatik multimodal: wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110218893
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218893 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2013 Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: A multimodal approach. In Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction,733–754.
  35. Habets, Boukje , Sotaro Kita , Zeshu Shao , Asli Özyürek & Peter Hagoort
    2011 The role of synchrony and ambiguity in speech–gesture integration during comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience23(8). 1845–1854. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21462
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21462 [Google Scholar]
  36. Harrison, Simon
    2009Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. Bordeaux: University of Bordeaux PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hassemer, Julius , Gina Joue , Klaus Willmes & Irene Mittelberg
    2011 Dimensions and mechanisms of form constitution: Towards a formal description of gestures. Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Gesture and Speech in Interaction (GESPIN) .
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Haviland, John B
    1993 Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology3. 3–45. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1993.3.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1993.3.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hengeveld, Kees & Evelien Keizer
    2011 Non-straightforward communication. Journal of Pragmatics43(7). 1962–1976. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
    2006 Functional discourse grammar. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopaedia of language and linguistics, vol. 4, 668–676. Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/02035‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02035-6 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2014 Grammar and context in Functional Discourse Grammar. Pragmatics24(2). 203–227. doi: 10.1075/prag.24.2.02hen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.2.02hen [Google Scholar]
  43. Kendon, Adam
    1972 Some relationships between body motion and speech. In Aaron W. Siegman & Benjamin Pope (eds.), Studies in dyadic communication, 177–210. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑015867‑9.50013‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1988 How gestures can become like words. In Fernando Poyatos (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141. Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 1992 Some recent work from Italy on quotable gestures (Emblems). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology2. 92–108. doi: 10.1525/jlin.1992.2.1.92
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1992.2.1.92 [Google Scholar]
  46. 1995 Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics23(3). 247–279. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
  47. 2004Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kendon, Adam , Thomas A. Sebeok & Jean Umiker-Sebeok
    1981Nonverbal communication, interaction, and gesture: Selections from Semiotica. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110880021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110880021 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kendon, Adam & Laura Versante
    2003 Pointing by hand in Neapolitan. In Sotaro Kita (ed.), 109–137. Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kita, Sotaro
    2000 How representational gestures help speaking. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture, 162–185. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2003Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 2009 Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes24(2). 145–167. doi: 10.1080/01690960802586188
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802586188 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kita, Sotaro & Asli Özyürek
    2003 What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language48(1). 16–32. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00505‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kress, Gunther R
    2000 Multimodality: Challenges to thinking about language. Tesol Quarterly34(2). 337–340. doi: 10.2307/3587959
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587959 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kress, Gunther R. & Theo van Leeuwen
    1996Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kroon, Caroline
    2005 The relationship between grammar and discourse: Evidence from the Latin particle quidem . Latina Lingua. 576–590.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Ladewig, Silva H
    2011 Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes. Revue de l’Association française de linguistique cognitive6. Available online atcognitextes.revues.org/406.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. 2012Syntactic and semantic integration of gestures into speech: Structural, cognitive, and conceptual aspects. Frankfurt (Oder): European University Viadrina PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ladewig, Silva H. & Jana Bressem
    2013 New insights into the medium hand: Discovering recurrent structures in gestures. Semiotica197. 203–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Langacker, Ronald W
    2001 Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics12(2). 143–188. doi: 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  62. Levelt, Wim J.M
    1989Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Levinson, Stephen C
    2003Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
  64. Levy, Elena T. & David McNeill
    1992 Speech, gesture, and discourse. Discourse Processes15(3). 277–301. doi: 10.1080/01638539209544813
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544813 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lücking, Andy , Kirsten Bergmann , Hahn Florian , Stefan Kopp & Hannes Rieser
    2010 The Bielefeld speech and gesture alignment corpus (SaGA). Proceedings of theLREC 2010 workshop on Multimodal corpora–advances in capturing, coding and analyzing multimodality.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
    2010 More tiles on the roof: Further thoughts on incremental language production. In Kasper Boye & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds.), Language usage and language structure, 263–294. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. McNeill, David
    1992Hand and mind. What the hands reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 2000Language and gesture. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620850
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2003 Aspects of aspect. Gesture3(1). 1–17. doi: 10.1075/gest.3.1.02mcn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.3.1.02mcn [Google Scholar]
  70. 2005Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  71. McNeill, David & Susan D. Duncan
    2000 Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture,162–185. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.011
  72. McNeill, David & Elena Levy
    1982 Conceptual representations in language activity and gesture. In Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York, NY: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Mittelberg, Irene & Tanja Mortelmans
    2013 Grammaticalized manual actions of giving and holding: From ditransitive to existential constructions in speech and gesture. Paper presented at the International Conference of Cognitive Linguistics (ICLC12) , Edmonton, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Müller, Cornelia
    1998 Iconicity and gesture. In Serge Santi (ed.), Oralité et Gestualité: Communication Multimodale, Interaction, 321–328. Montréal: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. 2004 Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family. In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, 234–256. Berlin: Weidler Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 2013 Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures. In Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction,202–217.
  77. Müller, Cornelia , Jana Bressem & Silva Ladewig
    2013a Towards a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. In Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction,707–732.
  78. Müller, Cornelia , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf
    (eds.) 2013bBody – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Müller, Cornelia , Silva H. Ladewig & Jana Bressem
    2013c Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history. In Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction,55–81.
  80. Muntigl, Peter
    2004 Modelling multiple semiotic systems: The case of gesture and speech. In Eija Ventola , Cassily Charles & Martin Kaltenbacher (eds.), Perspectives on multimodality, 31–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ddcs.6.04mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.6.04mun [Google Scholar]
  81. Okrent, Arika
    2002 A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). In Richard P. Meier , Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 175–198. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486777.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.009 [Google Scholar]
  82. Özyürek, Asli , Sotaro Kita , Shanley E.M. Allen , Reyhan Furman & Amanda Brown
    2005 How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic variations and similarities. Gesture5(1–2). 219–240. doi: 10.1075/gest.5.1‑2.15ozy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.5.1-2.15ozy [Google Scholar]
  83. Parrill, Fey
    2010 Viewpoint in speech–gesture integration: Linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes25. 650–668. doi: 10.1080/01690960903424248
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903424248 [Google Scholar]
  84. Parrill, Fay , Benjamin K. Bergen & Patricia V. Lichtenstein
    2013 Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics24(1). 135–158. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
  85. Payrató, Lluís
    1993 A pragmatic view on autonomous gestures: A first repertoire of Catalan emblems. Journal of Pragmatics20(3). 193–216. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90046‑R
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90046-R [Google Scholar]
  86. Poggi, Isabella
    2008 Iconicity in different types of gestures. Gesture8(1). 45–61. doi: 10.1075/gest.8.1.05pog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.1.05pog [Google Scholar]
  87. Sadeghipour, Amir & Stefan Kopp
    2014 Learning a motor grammar of gesture. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , Quebec City, Canada.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Sandoval, Richard
    2014 Gestures in native Northern America: Bimodal talk in Arapaho. In Cornelia Müller , Alan Cienki , Ellen Fricke , Silva H. Ladewig , David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), 1215–1226.
  89. Schoonjans, Steven
    2014 Is gesture subject to grammaticalization? Papers of the Linguistic Society of Belgium 8. Available online atuahost.uantwerpen.be/linguist/SBKL/Vol8.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Sherzer, Joel
    1973 Verbal and nonverbal deixis: The pointed lip gesture among the San Blas Cuna. Language in Society2. 117–131. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500000087
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000087 [Google Scholar]
  91. Slama-Cazacu, Tatiana
    1976 Nonverbal components in message sequence: ‘Mixed syntax’. In William C. McCormack & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), Language and man: Anthropological issues, 217–227. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Sparhawk, Carol M
    1978 Contrastive-identificational features of Persian gesture. Semiotica24(1–2). 49–86. doi: 10.1515/semi.1978.24.1‑2.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1978.24.1-2.49 [Google Scholar]
  93. Stec, Kashmiri
    2012 Meaningful shifts: A review of viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture12(3). 327–360. doi: 10.1075/gest.12.3.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.3.03ste [Google Scholar]
  94. Stokoe, William C
    1960/2005 Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education10(1). 3–37. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eni001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni001 [Google Scholar]
  95. Streeck, Jürgen
    1993 Gesture as communication: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communications Monographs60(4). 275–299. doi: 10.1080/03637759309376314
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376314 [Google Scholar]
  96. 2002 Grammars, words, and embodied meanings: On the uses and evolution of so and like . Journal of Communication52(3). 581–596. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02563.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02563.x [Google Scholar]
  97. 2009Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  98. Sweetser, Eve
    1998 Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes .
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Talmy, Leonard
    1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Turner, Mark & Francis Steen
    2012 Multimodal Construction Grammar. In Michael Borkent , Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer A.J. Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 255–274. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Webb, Rebecca A
    1996Linguistic features of metaphoric gestures. New York, NY: University of Rochester PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Wilcox, Sherman
    2004 Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed language. Cognitive Linguistics15(2). 119–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Wilcox, Sherman & André Nogueira Xavier
    2013 A framework for unifying spoken language, signed language, and gesture. Revista Todas as Letras15(1). 88–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Wilkins, David
    2003 Why pointing with the index finger is not a universal (in sociocultural and semiotic terms). In Sotaro Kita (ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet,171–215.
  105. Zima, Elisabeth
    2014 English multimodal motion constructions: A Construction Grammar perspective. Papers of the Linguistic Society of Belgium 8. Available online atuahost.uantwerpen.be/linguist/SBKL/Vol8.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error