1887
Volume 23, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Subjectivity and intersubjectivity have long been recognized as central to the understanding of the relations between language, mind and society. They arise in an interactive world for the mind of the individual and shape his/her (inter)personal reality. In present-day linguistics, there are two major approaches to subjectivity. One is associated with Langacker and focuses on cognitive construal. The other framework, which was developed by Traugott, zooms in on diachronic changes on the conceptual level. Naturally, diachronic developments are intimately related to synchronic variation and the conceptual content of an utterance hinges on its presentation and perspectivization. This paper, therefore, argues that, rather than being discrepant and treating distinct phenomena, as is widely suggested (e.g. Brisard 2006; Nuyts 2001, 2012), the two frameworks can be reconciled. By so doing, the ensuing discussion yields an integrated view on objectivity and (inter)subjectivity, a view that will be organized around four main arguments.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.2.02kra
2016-10-07
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adamson, Sylvia
    2000A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Olga Fischer , Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.53.04ada
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.04ada [Google Scholar]
  2. Athanasiadou, Angeliki , Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie
    2006 Introduction. In Angeliki Athanasiadou , Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity,1–13. doi: 10.1515/9783110892970.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892970.1
  3. (eds.) 2006Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110892970
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892970 [Google Scholar]
  4. Benveniste, Émile
    1971Problems in general linguistics. Coral Gables, Fa: University of Miami Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blank, Andreas & Peter Koch
    (eds.) 1999Historical semantics and cognition. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110804195
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804195 [Google Scholar]
  6. Breban, Tine
    2006 Grammaticalization and subjectification of the English adjectives of general comparison. In Angeliki Athanasiadou , Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity,241–277.
  7. 2010English adjectives of comparison: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110216011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216011 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brisard, Frank
    2006 Logic, subjectivity, and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. In Angeliki, Athanasiadou , Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity,41–74.
  9. Bybee, Joan
    2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language82. 711–733. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  10. Carey, Kathleen
    1995 Subjectification and the development of the English perfect. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation,83–102. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.005
  11. Cornillie, Bert
    2007Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish semi-auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft, William
    2009 Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 395–420. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.24.25cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.25cro [Google Scholar]
  13. Davidse, Kristin
    2013 Nominal reference and the dynamics of discourse: A cognitive-functional approach. In María de los Ángeles , Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza & Francisco Gonzálvez García (eds.), Form and function in language: Functional, Cognitive and applied perspectives, 189–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.247
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247 [Google Scholar]
  14. Davidse, Kristin , Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens
    (eds.) 2013Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Degand, Liesbeth & Benjamin Fagard
    2011Alors between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language18. 29–56. doi: 10.1075/fol.18.1.02deg
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.1.02deg [Google Scholar]
  16. De Smet, Hendrik & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
    2006 Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics17. 365–392.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Evans, Vyvyan & Melanie Green
    2006Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    2004 Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies6. 427–448. doi: 10.1177/1461445604046585
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604046585 [Google Scholar]
  19. Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens
    2007 Introducing cognitive linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 3–21. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghesquière, Lobke
    2010 On the subjectification and intersubjectificationpaths followed by the adjectives of completeness. In Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization,277–314.
  21. Ghesquière, Lobke , Lieselotte Brems & Freek Van de Velde
    2012 Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification: Typology and operationalizaiton. English Text Construction5. 128–152. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.1.07ghe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.07ghe [Google Scholar]
  22. Harder, Peter
    2010Meaning in mind and society: A Functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110216059
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216059 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hougaard, Anders R. & Gitte R. Hougaard
    2009 Fused bodies: Sense-making as a phenomenon of interacting, knowledgeable, social bodies. In Hanna Pishwa (ed.), Social cognition and language. Expression of the social mind,47–78.
  24. Keller, Rudi
    1994On language change: The invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Krawczak, Karolina
    2013Epiphenomenal semantics: Cognition, context and convention. Frankfurt/Main: Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑02436‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02436-4 [Google Scholar]
  26. Langacker, Ronald W
    1985 Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 109–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.6.07lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.07lan [Google Scholar]
  27. 1987Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1990 Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics1. 5–38. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  29. 1991Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1999aGrammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110800524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  31. 1999b Losing control: Grammmaticalization, subjectification, and transparency. In Andreas Blank & Peter Koch (eds.), Historical semantics and cognition,147–175.
  32. 2001 Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics12. 143–188. doi: 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2002 Deixis and subjectivity. In Frank Brisard (ed.), Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110899801.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899801.1 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2006 Subjectification, grammaticization and conceptual archetypes. In Angeliki Athanasiadou , Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity,18–40.
  35. 2007 Constructing the meanings of personal pronouns. In Günter Radden , Klaus-Michael Köpcke , Thomas Berg & Peter Siemund (eds.), Aspects of meaning construction, 171–187. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.136.12lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.136.12lan [Google Scholar]
  36. 2008Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110214369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2011 Grammaticalization and cognitive grammar. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 79–91. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. López-Couso, María José
    2010 Subjectification and intersubjectification. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 127–163. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Narrog, Heiko
    2012a Beyond intersubjectification: Textual uses of modality and mood in subordinate clauses as part of speech-act orientation. English Text Construction5. 29–52. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.1.03nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.03nar [Google Scholar]
  41. 2012bModality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694372.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nuyts, Jan
    2001 Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics33. 383–400. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00009‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00009-6 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2012 Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction5. 53–76. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.1.04nuy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.04nuy [Google Scholar]
  44. Paradis, Carita
    2003 Between epistemic modality and degree: The case of really . In Roberta Facchinetti , Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 191–220. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pishwa, Hanna
    (ed.) 2009Social cognition and language. Expression of the social mind. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110216080
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216080 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1990 The principle of intersubjectivity in communication and conversation. Semiotica80. 121–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Stein, Dieter & Susan Wright
    (eds.) 1995Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tomasello, Michael
    1999The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language65. 31–55. doi: 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  50. 1995 Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation,31–54. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
  51. 1999 The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change. In Andreas Blank & Peter Koch (eds.), Historical semantics and cognition,177–196.
  52. 2003 From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization,29–71.
  54. 2012 Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction5. 7–28. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.1.02trau [Google Scholar]
  55. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard Dasher
    2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König
    1991 The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 189–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo [Google Scholar]
  57. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and constructional change. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Verhagen, Arie
    1995 Subjectification, syntax and communication. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation,103–128. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.006
  59. 2005Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Zlatev, Jordan , Timothy Racine , Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen
    (eds.) 2008The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.2.02kra
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error