Butler, Christopher & Francisco Gonzálvez-García. Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space

References

1. Baayen, Rolf Harald
   2008 Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
2. Herbst, Thomas
   2011 The status of generalizations: Valency and argument structure constructions. In Thomas Herbst & Anatol Stefanowitsch , Argument structure: Valency and/or constructions,347–366.
3. Herbst, Thomas & Anatol Stefanowitsch
   (eds.) 2011 Argument structure: Valency and/or constructions. Special issue of Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik59(4).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Keizer, Evelien
   2013 The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds.), Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar, 213–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.137.09kei
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.137.09kei [Google Scholar]
5. Langacker, Ronald W
   2009 Cognitive (Construction) grammar. Cognitive Linguistics20. 167–176.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Nolan, Brian & Elke Diedrichsen
   (eds.) 2013 Linking constructions into functional linguistics (Studies in Language Companion Series, Volume 145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.145
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.145 [Google Scholar]
7. Perek, Florent & Martin Hilpert
   2014 Constructional tolerance: Cross-linguistic differences in the acceptability of non-conventional uses of constructions. Constructions and Frames6(2). 266–304.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
   2011 Argument structure: Item-based or distributed?In Thomas Herbst & Anatol Stefanowitsch , Argument structure: Valency and/or constructions,369–386.