1887
Volume 23, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The present article presents a corpus-based study of two near-synonymous verbs in Spanish: the locative verbs of putting and . Starting from the universal principle of linguistic economy, the paper aims to empirically identify potentially influencing variables that determine the native speaker’s choice between the two verbs. It is investigated whether and to what extent the choice is governed by a set of variables related to the nature of the locative movement itself and the characteristics of the participants taking part in the event. The difference between the near-synonyms is shown to be determined mainly by the direction of the locative movement, the semantic nature of the participants (animacy, concreteness), the reflexiveness of the event, as well as the cognitive construal of the locative event (the possibility of a container-reading).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.3.01com
2017-02-06
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CREA
    = Corpus de referencia del español actual. Real Academia Española: Banco de datos. Available online atcorpus.rae.es/creanet.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aissen, Judith
    2003 Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory21. 435–483. doi: 10.1023/A:1024109008573
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024109008573 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. Harald
    2008Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511801686
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bossong, Georg
    1998 Le marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues de l’Europe. In Jack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 193–257. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burnham, Kenneth P. & David R. Anderson
    2002Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cifuentes, José Luis
    1996 Estructuras locales de base personalEstructuras locales de base personal . In José Luis Cifuentes & Jesús Llopis (eds.), Complemento indirecto y complemento de lugar: Estructuras locales de base personal en español, 74–181. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2004 Verbos locales estativos en español. In José Luis Cifuentes & Carmen Marimón (eds.), Estudios de Lingüística: el Verbo, 73–118. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Comer, Marie , Renata Enghels & Clara Vanderschueren
    2015 De verbos de colocación a pseudo-copulativos: Procesos de gramaticalización en los cuasi-sinónimos poner/meter y pôr/meter en español y en portugués. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie131(2). 335–382. doi: 10.1515/zrp‑2015‑0023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2015-0023 [Google Scholar]
  9. Comrie, Bernard
    1981Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crego García, María
    2000El complemento locativo en español: Los verbos de movimiento y su combinatoria sintáctico-semántica. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Croft, William
    2003Typology and universals. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2012Verbs: Aspect and clausal structure. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dahl, Östen
    2008 Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny. Lingua118. 141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  14. Divjak, Dagmar
    2010Structuring the lexicon. A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110220599
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220599 [Google Scholar]
  15. Enghels, Renata & Marlies Jansegers
    2013 On the cross-linguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: A contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics51(5). 957–991. doi: 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0034 [Google Scholar]
  16. Enghels, Renata & Eugeen Roegiest
    2014 Contrasting the syntax and semantics of negative causation: The apparent similarity of Spanish and Portuguese. Languages in Contrast14(2). 278–306. doi: 10.1075/lic.14.2.05eng
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.2.05eng [Google Scholar]
  17. Fagard, Benjamin & Alexandru Mardale
    2012 The pace of grammaticalization and the evolution of prepositional systems: Data from Romance. Folia Linguistica46. 303–340. doi: 10.1515/flin.2012.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2012.011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fernández Ordóñez, Inés
    1999 Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1317–1398. Madrid: Espasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Geeraerts, Dirk
    2010 The doctor and the semantician. In Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches,63–78.
  20. Glynn, Dylan & Kerstin Fischer
    2010Quantitative methods in Cognitive Semantics: Corpus-driven approaches. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110226423
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226423 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gries, Stefan
    2006 Corpus-based methods and Cognitive Semantics: The many senses of to run . In Stefan Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 57–99. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110197709
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197709 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013Statistics for linguistics with R, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110307474
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110307474 [Google Scholar]
  23. Janda, Laura
    2013Cognitive Linguistics: The quantitative turn. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110335255
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335255 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lamiroy, Béatrice
    1987 Les verbes de mouvement emplois figurés et extensions métaphoriques. Langue française76. 41–58. doi: 10.3406/lfr.1987.4730
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1987.4730 [Google Scholar]
  25. Langacker, Ronald
    1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maldonado, Ricardo
    2000 Conceptual distance and transitivity increase in Spanish reflexives. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions, 153–185. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.40.07mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.40.07mal [Google Scholar]
  27. R Core Team
    2014R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R foundation for statistical computing. Available online atwww.R-project.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Roegiest, Eugeen
    1999 Objet direct prépositionnel ou objet indirect en espagnol. Verbum21(1). 67–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Silva, Augusto Soares da
    2012 Stages of grammaticalization of causative verbs and constructions in Portuguese, Spanish, French and Italian. Folia Linguistica46(2). 513–552.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Speelman, Dirk & Dirk Geeraerts
    2009 Causes for causatives: The case of Dutch doen and laten . In Ted Sanders & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Causal categories in discourse and cognition, 173–204. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Talmy, Leonard
    1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic descriptions, 57–149. New York, NY: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society17. 480–519. doi: 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2000aToward a Cognitive Semantics I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2000bToward a Cognitive Semantics II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Yamamoto, Mutsumi
    1999Animacy and reference. A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.46
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.46 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.3.01com
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error