1887
Volume 23, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article deals with impersonal clauses in Chinese (ICiCs) (e.g. 台上唱着戏). These are called pseudo-existentials in the literature, as they resemble typical existentials both in form and in meaning. I argue that ICiCs are impersonal, ergatively oriented, and existential. They are impersonal in that the actor of the process is typically demoted to the end position or completely omitted; ergatively oriented in that they express the meaning of instead of , and existential in that they present the existence of events with reference to some location realized by the initial locative nominal group. These three semantic aspects are in tune with each other and are realized by the structure NGL ^ VG ^ NG, in which VG ^ NG constitutes the event, whose existence is expressed through its configuration with the initial NGL.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.3.04wan
2017-02-06
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, Werner & Elisabeth Leiss
    2006 Personal and impersonal passive: Definite vs. indefinite diathesis. Transactions of the Philological Society104 (2). 259–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2006.00167.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2006.00167.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Afonso, Susana
    2008 Existentials as impersonalizing devices: The case of European Portuguese. Transactions of the Philological Society106(2). 180–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2008.00192.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00192.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Cáo, Bóhán
    1956 Zhǔyǔ bīnyǔ wèntí suígǎn (‘Reflections on the issue of subject and object’). In Editorial Board of Chinese Language (eds.), Hànyǔ-de Zhǔyǔ Bīnyǔ Wèntí (‘The Issue of Subject and Object in Chinese’), 192–198. Beijing: Zhōnghuá Shūjú.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidse, Kristin
    1992 Transitivity/Ergativity: The Janus-headed grammar of actions and events. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 105–135. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 1998 On transitivity and ergativity in English, or on the need for dialogue between schools. In Johan van der Auwera , Frank Durieux , & Ludo Lejeune (eds.), English as a human language: To honour Louis Goossens, 3–26. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dixon, R.M.W
    1994Ergativity. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fan, Fanglian
    1963 Cúnzàijù (‘Existential sentences’). Zhōngguó Yǔwén (‘Chinese Language’) 5. 386–393.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Fù, Zǐdōng
    1956 Zhǔcí hé bīncí (‘Subject and object’). In Editorial Board of Chinese Language (eds.), Hànyǔ-de Zhǔyǔ Bīnyǔ Wèntí (‘The Issue of Subject and Object in Chinese’), 76–96. Beijing: Zhōnghuá Shūjú.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Guo, Jimao
    1990 Lǐngzhǔshǔbīnjù (‘Sentences with possessor as subject and possessum as object’). Zhōngguó Yǔwén (‘Chinese Language’) 1. 24–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Halliday, M.A.K
    1968 Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 3. Journal of Linguistics4. 179–215. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700001882
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700001882 [Google Scholar]
  11. 1994An introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Halliday, M.A.K. & James R. Martin
    1993Writing science. London: The Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
    1999Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2004An introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Langacker, Ronald W
    1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol.2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Malchukov, Andrej & Akio Ogawa
    2011 Towards a typology of impersonal constructions: A semantic map approach. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 19–56. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.124
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124 [Google Scholar]
  17. Pan, Haihua & Jingquan Han
    2005 Xiǎnxìng fēibīngé dòngcí jiégòude jùfǎ yánjiū (‘The Syntax of Surface Unaccusative Constructions’). Yǔyán Yánjiū (‘Language Research’) 3. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ren, Ying
    2009 Cóng gàiniànde guānlián dào gòushì-de guānlián: Yě cóng Wáng Miǎn sǐle fùqīnde shēngchéng fāngshì shuōqǐ (‘How the sentence ‘Wáng Miǎn sǐ-le fùqīn’ is generated: From the correlation of concepts to that of constructions’). Shìjiè Hànyǔ Jiāoxué (‘Chinese Teaching in the World’) 3. 308–321.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Shi, Yuzhi
    2007 Yǔyánxué jiǎshèzhōngde zhèngjù wèntí (‘On evidence of linguistic hypothesis’). Yǔyán Kēxué (‘Linguistic Sciences’) 4. 39–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Siewierska, Anna
    2008 Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject-centred vs. agent-centred perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society106(2). 115–137. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2008.00211.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00211.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Song, Yuzhu
    2007Xiàndài Hànyǔ Cúnzàijù (‘Existential sentences in Modern Chinese’): Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wang, Yong & Jie Xue
    2010 Hànyǔ cúnzàijùde gòushì yǔfǎ yánjiū (‘A Construction Grammar study of the Chinese existential sentence’). Yǔyán Yánjiū (‘Language Research’) 3. 62–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2013 A systemic typology of possessive and existential constructions. Functions of Language20(1). 1–30. doi: 10.1075/fol.20.1.01wan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20.1.01wan [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang, Yong & Yingfang Zhou
    2011 Cúnzàijù zhǔyǔ de lèixíngxué yánjiū (‘A typological study of the subject in the existential construction’). Wàiyǔ Jiàoxué yǔ Yánjiū (‘Foreign Language Teaching and Research’) 2. 163–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2014a Xiàndài hànyǔ zhōngde shìjiànlèi cúnzàijù (‘Event-existentials in Modern Chinese’). Wàiguóyǔ ( ‘Journal of Foreign Languages’) 3. 71–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2014b A functional study of event-existentials in Modern Chinese. Functional Linguistics1:7. doi: 10.1186/2196‑419X‑1‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-419X-1-7 [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu, Jie
    1999 Liǎngzhǒng bǎoliú bīnyǔ jùshì jí xiāngguān jùfǎ lǐlùn wèntí (‘Some theoretical issues of the two types of Chinese retained-object construction’). Dāngdài Yǔyánxué (‘Contemporary Linguistics’) 1. 16–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Xing, Fuyi
    1996Hànyǔ Yǔfǎxué (‘Chinese Grammar’). Changchun: North-East Normal University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Yamamoto, Mutsumi
    2006Agency and impersonality: Their linguistic and cultural manifestations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.78
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.78 [Google Scholar]
  30. Yi, Yan & Anna Siewierska
    2011 Referential impersonal constructions in Mandarin. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 547–580. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.124.19yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.19yan [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhu, Dexi
    1980Xiàndài Hànyǔ Yǔfǎ Yánjiū (‘Studies on the Grammar of Modern Chinese’). Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 1981Yǔfǎ Jiǎngyì. (‘Lecture Notes on Chinese Grammar’). Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1985Yǔfǎ Dáwèn (‘Dialogues on Chinese Grammar’). Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ziv, Yael
    1982 Getting more mileage out of existentials in English. Linguistics20. 747–762.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.3.04wan
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error