1887
Volume 23, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Nancy Bell. We are not amused. Failed humor in interaction., Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/fol.23.3.05ste-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.3.05ste
2017-02-06
2019-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bell, Nancy
    2009a Impolite responses to failed humor. In Delia Chiaro & Neal Norrick (eds.), Humor in interaction, 143–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.182.07bel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182.07bel [Google Scholar]
  2. 2009b Responses to failed humor. Journal of Pragmatics4. 1825–1836. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2013 Responses to incomprehensible humor. Journal of Pragmatics7. 176–189. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.019 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bell, Nancy & Salvatore Attardo
    2010 Failed humor: Issues in non-native speakers’ appreciation and understanding of humor. Intercultural Pragmatics7. 423–447. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2010.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.019 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergson, Henri
    [1900] 2008Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. Rockville, MD: Arc Manor.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carrell, Amy
    1997 Joke competence and humor competence. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research10(2). 173–185.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1981Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hay, Jennifer
    2001 The pragmatics of humor support. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research14(1). 55–82. doi: 10.1515/humr.14.1.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hinnenkamp, Volker
    2001 Constructing misunderstanding as a cultural event. In Aldo di Luzio , Susanne Günther & Franca Orletti (eds.), Culture in communication: Analyses of intercultural situations, 211–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.81.13hin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.81.13hin [Google Scholar]
  12. Hobbes, Thomas
    1840Human nature. Available online atonlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/metabook?id=hobbesworks.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kramer, Elise
    2011 The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke arguments. Language in Society40. 137–168. doi: 10.1017/S0047404511000017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000017 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lockyer, Sharon & Michael Pickering
    2001 Dear shit-shovellers: Humour, censure and the discourse of complaints. Discourse and Society12. 633–651. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012005004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012005004 [Google Scholar]
  15. Palmer, Jerry
    1994Taking humour seriously. New York, NY: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203380154
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203380154 [Google Scholar]
  16. Priego-Valverde, Beatrice
    2009 Failed humor in conversation: A double-voicing analysis. In Delia Chiaro & Neal Norrick (eds.), Humor in interaction, 165–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.182.08pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.182.08pri [Google Scholar]
  17. Raskin, Victor
    1985Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schlesinger, Izchak & Sharon Hurvitz
    2008 The structure of misunderstandings. Pragmatics and Cognition16(3). 568–585. doi: 10.1075/pc.16.3.07sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.3.07sch [Google Scholar]
  19. Weigand, Edda
    1999 Misunderstanding: The standard case. Journal of Pragmatics31. 763–785. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00068‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00068-X [Google Scholar]
  20. Wolfson, Nessa
    1988 The bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance. In Jonathan Fine (ed.), Second language discourse: A textbook of current research, 21–38. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23.3.05ste
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error