1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Functions of Language
  4. Volume 32, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper investigates the evolution of the present perfect and in English to assess whether these forms may be considered emerging inferentials. Combining quantitative and qualitative analyses in diachrony and synchrony, it argues that the two forms may show incipient signs of the grammaticalization of inferential evidentiality. The present perfect is already fully grammaticalized in its morphology, and highly frequent. Inferential evidentiality is not part of its meaning, but a slightly rising implicature. The semi-auxiliary is less grammaticalized morphologically, but possesses a distinct function that is traditionally called ‘epistemic’, but is rather ‘logical inferential’. This function is still infrequent, but has been rising steadily in the past decades. Whether these changes will lead to a fully-developed evidential paradigm is unpredictable, but this study confirms that evidentiality is a necessary notion to describe English grammar and its evolution accurately.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23017.mel
2025-03-04
2026-03-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/fol.23017.mel
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarts, Bas
    2011 Oxford modern English grammar. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aijmer, Karin
    1980 Evidence and the declarative sentence. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2011 The grammaticalization of evidentiality. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 605–613. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0049
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0049 [Google Scholar]
  5. Algeo, John
    2006 British or American English? A handbook of word and grammar patterns. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511607240
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607240 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolinger, Dwight
    1980 Wanna and the gradience of auxiliaries. InGunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann (eds.), Wege zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler, 292–299. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
    2009 Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language16(1). 9–43. 10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy [Google Scholar]
  8. Brinton, Laurel J.
    1991 The origin and development of quasimodal have to in English. Paper presented at the10th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL 10). Amsterdam, 12–16 August 1991.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornillie, Bert
    2009 Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of language16(1). 44–62. 10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor [Google Scholar]
  11. Corre, Éric
    2006 Quelques réflexions sur le Present Perfect Puzzle. InClaude Delmas (ed.), Complétude, cognition, construction linguistique, 195–210. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. 10.4000/books.psn.3155
     https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psn.3155 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cruse, D. Alan
    1986 Lexical semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. de Haan, Ferdinand
    2001 The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte91. 201–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2013 Coding of evidentiality. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.7385533 (wals.info/chapter/78; accessed16 June 2024).
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 [Google Scholar]
  15. Declerck, Renaat
    1991 Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ekberg, Lena & Carita Paradis
    2009 Evidentiality in language and cognition. Functions of Language16(1). 5–7. 10.1075/fol.16.1.02ekb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.02ekb [Google Scholar]
  17. Fischer, Olga
    1994 The development of quasi-auxiliaries in English and changes in word order. Neophilologus781. 137–164. 10.1007/BF00999959
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999959 [Google Scholar]
  18. Friedman, Victor A.
    1986 Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. InWallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Advances in discourse processes, 168–87. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 2018 Where do evidentials come from?InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 124–147. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.6
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.6 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fryd, Marc
    2015 The narrative present perfect in English. InJuan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla, Carmen Maíz, Elena Domínguez & María Victoria Martín de la Rosa (eds.), Thinking modally: English and contrastive studies on modality, 185–202. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Grice, Herbert P.
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  22. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316423530
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  23. Izvorski, Roumyana
    1997 The present perfect as an epistemic modal. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory71. 222–239. 10.3765/salt.v7i0.2795
     https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v7i0.2795 [Google Scholar]
  24. Johanson, Lars
    2003 Evidentiality in Turkic. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 273–291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.54.15joh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.15joh [Google Scholar]
  25. Kearns, Kate
    2011 Semantics, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑35609‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35609-2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Krug, Manfred
    2000 Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110820980
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110820980 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    (eds.) 2019 World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316479704
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
  28. Larreya, Paul
    2009 Towards a typology of modality in language. InRaphael Salkie, Pierre Bussutil & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Modality in English: Theory and description, 9–29. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110213331.9
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213331.9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Landis, Richard J. & Gary G. Koch
    1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics331. 159–174. 10.2307/2529310
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  30. Leech, Geoffrey
    2013 Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. InMarta Carretero & Jorge Arús Hita (eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality, 95–115. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110286328.95
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110286328.95 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lehmann, Christian
    1995 [1982] Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lindstedt, Jouko
    2000 The perfect — aspectual, temporal and evidential. InÖsten Dahl (ed.), Empirical approaches to language typology, 365–384. Berlin: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lorenz, David
    2013 Contractions of English semi-modals: The emancipating effect of frequency. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg PhD thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Mair, Christian & Geoffrey Leech
    2006 Recent changes in English syntax. InBas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.), The handbook of English linguistics, 318–342. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470753002.ch14
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  35. Maisak, Timur
    2021 Structural and functional variations of the perfect in the Lezgic languages. InKristin M. Eide & Marc Fryd (eds.), The perfect volume: Papers on the perfect, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.217.04mai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.217.04mai [Google Scholar]
  36. Marín-Arrese, Juana I., Marta Carretero & Aurelija Usonienė
    2022 Evidentiality in English. InBjörn Wiemer & Juana I. Marin-Arrese (eds.), Evidential marking in European languages: Toward a unitary comparative account, 57–94. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110726077‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726077-002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Matthews, Richard
    1991 Words and worlds: On the linguistic analysis of modality. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Mélac, Eric
    2014 L’évidentialité en anglais — approche contrastive à partir d’un corpus anglais-tibétain. Paris: Université de la Sorbonne nouvelle — Paris 3PhD dissertation. Available online athttps://theses.hal.science/tel-01230545/file/These_MELAC_Eric_2014.pdf
  39. 2022 The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language & Linguistics26(2). 331–359. 10.1017/S1360674321000101
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000101 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2023 The pragmatic differences between grammatical and lexical evidentiality: A corpus-based study of Tibetan and English. Journal of Pragmatics2101. 143–156. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.03.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.03.017 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2024 The links between evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization. Studies in Language48(3). 513–542. 10.1075/sl.24011.mel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24011.mel [Google Scholar]
  42. Mélac, Eric & Joanna Bialek
    2024 Evidentiality as a grammaticalization passenger: An investigation of evidential developments in Tibetic languages and beyond. Studies in Language48(3). 638–681. 10.1075/sl.23009.mel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23009.mel [Google Scholar]
  43. Narrog, Heiko
    2005 Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: A new perspective. Cognitive Linguistics16(4). 677–731. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.677
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.677 [Google Scholar]
  44. Nuyts, Jan
    2017 Evidentiality reconsidered. InJuana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Hassler & Marta Carretero (eds.), Evidentiality revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives, 57–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.271.03nuy
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.271.03nuy [Google Scholar]
  45. Palmer, Frank
    1987 The English verb, 2nd edn. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Plato
    Plato. 339 BC. Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. Originally published with English translation in 1914 translation by Harold N. Fowler). Loeb Classical Library 36. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ritz, Marie-Eve A.
    2010 The perfect crime? Illicit uses of the present perfect in Australian police media releases. Journal of Pragmatics42(12). 3400–3417. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina
    2015 Can we predict linguistic change? An introduction. Studies in variation, contacts and change in English161. Helsinki: VARIENG. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/series/volumes/16/ (accessed16 June 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Serpault, Pauline
    2017 Tentative d’analyse énonciative de have to. Caen: Université de Normandie PhD dissertation.
  50. Squartini, Mario
    2016 Interactions between modality and other semantic categories. InJan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 50–67. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Sweetser, Eve
    1988 Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Berkeley Linguistics Society (1988) 389–405. 10.3765/bls.v14i0.1774
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1774 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2000 The grammaticalization of the present perfect in English: Tracks of change and continuity in a linguistic enclave. InOlga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 329–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.53.16tag
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.16tag [Google Scholar]
  53. Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Alexandra D’Arcy
    2007 The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective. English World-Wide28(1). 47–87. 10.1075/eww.28.1.04tag
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.1.04tag [Google Scholar]
  54. Tournadre, Nicolas
    1996 Comparaison des systèmes médiatifs de quatre dialectes tibétains (tibétain central, ladakhi, dzongkha et amdo). InZlatka Guentchéva (ed.), L’énonciation médiatisé, 195–213. Louvain: Peeters.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    1995 Subjectification in grammaticalization. InDieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2002 From etymology to historical pragmatics. InDonka Minkova & Robert Stockwell (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language: A millennial perspective, 19–50. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197143.1.19
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197143.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  57. Westney, Paul
    1995 Modals and periphrastics in English: An investigation into the semantic correspondence between certain English modal verbs and their periphrastic equivalents. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783110958904
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110958904 [Google Scholar]
  58. Whitt, Richard J.
    2009 Auditory evidentiality in English and German: The case of perception verbs. Lingua119(7). 1083–1095. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ziegeler, Debra
    2010 Semantic determinism and the grammaticalisation of have to in English: a reassessment. Journal of Historical Pragmatics11(1). 32–66. 10.1075/jhp.11.1.02zie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.11.1.02zie [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23017.mel
Loading
Emerging inferentials in English?
Functions of Language 32, 105 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23017.mel
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23017.mel
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23017.mel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): evidentiality; grammaticalization; have to; inferential; present perfect

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error