1887
Volume 32, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper contributes to the study of actualization through a case study on the development of the Chinese NP++NP+VP construction. Actualization is the process following syntactic reanalysis in which new linguistic structures diffuse and extend their usage. Data are sourced from The Centre for Chinese Linguistics (CCL) Corpus. Multiple Correspondence Analysis is employed to explore the dynamic relationships among several subconstructions, and Multidimensional Scaling is adopted to visualize the continuity of their meanings. The findings indicate that: (1) the subconstructions form a continuum from expressing disposition meanings to causative meanings; (2) over time, the manipulation of NP to NP decreases, while the affectedness of NP increases; (3) evidence of actualization is observed in the expansion of both semantic and syntactic distributional contexts. These results challenge prevalent claims regarding the high affectedness of the argument marked by and present further evidence for the ongoing debate over directionality in language change. These findings lend support to the gradualness (Traugott & Trousdale 2010) and diffusion hypotheses (De Smet 2016) of language change, and supplement these hypotheses by proposing that the actualization process can be influenced by the token frequency of existing patterns.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23049.zuo
2025-09-25
2026-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, Henning
    2001 Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. InHenning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress, 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.219.11and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219.11and [Google Scholar]
  2. Beavers, John
    2011 On affectedness. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory291. 335–370. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9124‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9124-6 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bisang, Walter & Andrej Malchukov
    2020Grammaticalization scenarios: Cross-linguistic variation and universal tendencies. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110563146
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563146 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bisang, Walter
    2015 Problems with primary vs. secondary grammaticalization: the case of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. Language Sciences471. 132–147. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan & Clay Beckner
    2009 Usage-based theory. InBernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 827–856. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0032 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chappell, Hilary
    2013 Pan-Sinitic object markers: morphology and syntax. InCao Guangshun, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond, 785–816. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, Noam
    1982Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Smet, Hendrik
    2012 The course of actualization. Language88(3). 601–633. 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2016 How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change28(1). 83–102. 10.1017/S0954394515000186
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394515000186 [Google Scholar]
  10. Delancey, Scott
    1981 An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language571. 626–657. 10.2307/414343
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414343 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deshors, Sandra C. & Sandra Götz
    2020 Common ground across globalized English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory16(1). 1–28. 10.1515/cllt‑2016‑0052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0052 [Google Scholar]
  12. Divjak, Dagmar
    2019Frequency in language: Memory, attention and learning. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316084410
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316084410 [Google Scholar]
  13. Du, Jing, Shan Zuo & Fuyin Thomas Li
    2023 Attraction or differentiation: Diachronic changes in the causative alternation of Chinese change of state verbs. Cognitive Linguistics35(4). 603–638. 10.1515/cog‑2023‑0094
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2023-0094 [Google Scholar]
  14. Du, Yi
    2008 Hanyu de Jiegou de Qiyuan yu Yanbian [The origin and evolution of the Chinese de Construction]. Beijing: Peking University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fang, Yu & Haitao Liu
    2021 Predicting syntactic choice in Mandarin Chinese: a corpus-based analysis of ba sentences and SVO sentences. Cognitive Linguistics32(2). 219–250. 10.1515/cog‑2020‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2020-0005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fischer, Olga
    2018 Analogy: Its role in language learning, categorization, and in models of language change such as grammaticalization and constructionalization. InSylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & Jose Vicente Lozano (eds.), New trends in grammaticalization and language change, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.202.04fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.202.04fis [Google Scholar]
  17. Givón, Talmy
    2001Syntax: An introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.syn2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syn2 [Google Scholar]
  18. Greenacre, Michael
    2007Correspondence analysis in practice. London: Chapman & Hall. 10.1201/9781420011234
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011234 [Google Scholar]
  19. Guo, Rui
    2003 Ba ziju de yuyi gouzao he lunyuan jiegou [The semantics and argument structures of BA sentences]. Yuyanxue Luncong281. 152–181.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hilpert, Martin
    2011 Dynamic visualizations of language change: Motion charts on the basis of bivariate and multivariate data from diachronic corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics16(4). 435–461. 10.1075/ijcl.16.4.01hil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.4.01hil [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  23. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?InWalter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197440.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language561. 251–299. 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hu, Chirui
    2005 Dongjie shi de zaoqi xingshi ji panding biaozhun [The early forms of the resultative construction and the relevant criterion]. Zhongguo Yuwen31. 214–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang, Shaoyu
    2017Jindai hanyu yanjiu gaiyao (Xiudingben) [An outline of Modern Chinese studies(Revision)]. Peking: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo & Hongyin Tao
    2009 The Mandarin disposition constructions: usage and development. Language and Linguistics10(1). 29–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Levin, Beth
    1993English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Levshina, Natalia
    2022 Semantic maps of causation: New hybrid approaches based on corpora and grammar descriptions. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft41(1). 179–205. 10.1515/zfs‑2021‑2043
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2021-2043 [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, Fuyin & Na Liu
    2021 Potentials for grammaticalization: Sensitivity to position and event type. Review of Cognitive Linguistics19(2). 363–402. 10.1075/rcl.00088.li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00088.li [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, Fuyin & Yu Shen
    2021Shijian yufa daolun [An introduction to event grammar]. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Liang, Yinfeng
    2007Hanyu quxiang dongci de yufahua [Grammaticalization of Chinese directional complements]. Shanghai: Xue Lin Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, Li & Ben Ambridge
    2021 Balancing information-structure and semantic constraints on construction choice: building a computational model of passive and passive-like constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics32(3). 349–388. 10.1515/cog‑2019‑0100
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2019-0100 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lyu, Shuxiang
    1999Xiandai hanyu babaici [Modern Chinese eight hundred words]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Naro, Anthony J.
    1981 The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language571. 63–98. 10.1353/lan.1981.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1981.0020 [Google Scholar]
  37. Peyraube, Alain & Thekla Wiebusch
    2020 New insights on the historical evolution of differential object marking (DOM) in Chinese. InXing, Janet Zhiqun (ed.), A typological approach to grammaticalization and lexicalization: East meets West, 101–129. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110641288‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110641288-005 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pijpops, Dirk & Van de Velde Freek
    2016 Constructional contamination: how does it work and how do we measure it?Folia Linguistica50(2). 543–581. 10.1515/flin‑2016‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2016-0020 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rosch, Eleanor
    1978 Principles of categorization. InEleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Loyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 27–48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Shao, Jingmin & Chunli Zhao
    2005 Zhishi ‘ba’ ziju he sheng‌lü‌e ‘bei’ ziju ji qi yuyong jieshi [Cognitive interpretation of the Ba-construction and the Bei-construction]. Hanyu Xuexi (4). 11–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Shen, Jiaxuan
    2002 Ruhe chuzhi chuzhi shi — Lun ba ziju de zhuguan xing [Can the disposal construction be disposed of? — On the subjectivity of the Ba construction in Mandarin Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen (5). 387–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Shi, Huimin
    2011Hanyu dongjie shi de zhenghe yu lishi yanbian [The integration and diachronic development of Chinese verb resultatives]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Song, Huanjie & Yuling Yang
    2022 Jiyu yinyu de ‘ba’ ziju jiazu goushi wangluo yanjiu [The network of the ba construction family based on metaphor]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu (4). 44–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sun, Chaofen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2011 Grammaticalization and word order change. InBernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 378–388. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0030
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0030 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sun, Chaofen
    1995 Transitivity, the ba construction and its history. Journal of Chinese Linguistics231. 159–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2015 The grammaticalization of the BA construction. InWilliam S-Y. Wang & Chaofen Sun (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, 429–442. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Thompson, Sandra A.
    1973 Transitivity and some problems with the BA construction in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics1(2). 208–221.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tian, Chunlai
    2007 Zutangji jieci yanjiu. [Studies on preposition in Zutangji]. Shanghai Normal University: Unpublished dissertation.
  49. Timberlake, Alan
    1977 Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. InCharles N. Li (ed.). Mechanisms of syntactic change, 141–177. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/750357‑006
    https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-006 [Google Scholar]
  50. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
    2010 Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization: How do they intersect?InElizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.90.04tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.04tra [Google Scholar]
  51. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2018 Modeling language change with constructional networks. InPons Bordería & Loureda Lamas (eds.), Beyond grammaticalization and discourse markers, 17–50. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1163/9789004375420_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004375420_003 [Google Scholar]
  52. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
    2013 On multiple source constructions in language change. Studies in Language37(3). 473–489. 10.1075/sl.37.3.01int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.01int [Google Scholar]
  54. Van der Klis, Martijn & Jos Tellings
    2022 Generating semantic maps through multidimensional scaling: linguistic applications and theory. Corpus Linguistics & Linguistic Theory18(1). 1–39. 10.1515/cllt‑2021‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2021-0018 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, Li
    1985Zhongguo Xiandai Yufa [Modern Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 1989Hanyu yufa shi [The history of Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wei, Pei-chuan
    1996 Lun gudai hanyu zhong jizhong chuzhishi zai fazhan zhong fen yu he [On the division and merging of several types of disposal forms in the course of their development in Archaic Chinese]. Zhongguo Jingnei Yuyan Ji Yuyanxue41. 555–594.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin Herzog
    1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. InWinfred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–188. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Wu, Fuxiang
    2003 Zailun chuzhishi de laiyuan [Further discussion on the origin of the disposal construction]. Yuyan Yanjiu23(3). 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Xiang, Kaixi
    2006 Hanyu shicheng biaoda yanjiu [Research on the expression of Chinese causative form]. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (GSCASS): Unpublished dissertation.
  61. Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2019 The development of the Chinese copula shì construction: A diachronic constructional perspective. Functions of Language26(2). 139–176. 10.1075/fol.16001.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16001.zha [Google Scholar]
  62. 2020 A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica37(1). 83–126. 10.1075/dia.18025.zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.18025.zha [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang, Wangxi
    2001 Ba ziju de weiyi tushi [The displacement of the Ba-sentence]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu (3). 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhu, Yubin
    2016 Jindai hanyu ba/jiang zi ju de jingzheng ji chengyin [On ba and jiang sentences in modern Chinese: Competition and causes]. Yantai Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban)29(6). 112–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Ziegeler, Debra
    2000 A possession-based analysis of the ba-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua1101. 807–842. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(00)00018‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00018-8 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23049.zuo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23049.zuo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error