1887
Volume 31, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines a construction in Aisi (Trans New Guinea) which consists of a formally subordinate clause that expresses asserted meaning. This construction is called ‘semi-embedding’. The construction is more restricted than subordinate clauses, and serves a specific discourse function: it presents the information in the matrix clause as a surprising climax. The paper argues that semi-embedding arose when the backgrounding function of subordinate clauses was extended to allow assertions to serve as backgrounds for certain highlighted events. As this happened, the relationship between the semi-embedded clause and its matrix became more coordinate, which allowed longer strings of semi-embedded clauses to occur in what is called disengagement (Cristofaro 2016). Fully insubordinate clauses can then occur when the main clause no longer has to be uttered. At this point, the foregrounded meaning that originally centered on the main clause attached, instead, to the newly insubordinate one.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23055.dan
2024-04-29
2025-02-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bache, Carl
    2016 Narrative when in English. English Language and Linguistics20(2). 273–294. 10.1017/S1360674316000071
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000071 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beijering, Karin, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena
    (eds.) 2019aInsubordination: Theoretical and empirical issues. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110638288
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2019b Insubordination: Central issues and open questions. InKarin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), 1–28. 10.1515/9783110638288
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beijering, Karin & Muriel Norde
    2019 Adverbial semi-insubordination constructions in Swedish: Synchrony and diachrony. InKarin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), 79–106. 10.1515/9783110638288‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288-004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bergs, Alexander
    2017 The myth of the complete sentence—a response to Traugott. English Language and Linguistics21(2). 311–316. 10.1017/S1360674317000156
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000156 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bickel, Balthasar
    1999 Nominalization and focus constructions in some Kiranti languages. InYogendra P. Yadava & Warren G. Glover (eds.), Topics in Nepalese linguistics, 271–296. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blake, Barry J.
    1999 Nominal marking on verbs: Some Australian cases. Word50(3). 299–317. 10.1080/00437956.1999.11432490
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1999.11432490 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet
    1990Meaning and grammar. An introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Comrie, Bernard, Diana Forker & Zaira Khalilova
    2016 Insubordination in Tsezic languages. InNicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), 171–182. 10.1075/tsl.115.07com
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.07com [Google Scholar]
  10. Cristofaro, Sonia
    2003Subordination. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2016 Routes to insubordination: A cross-linguistic perspective. InNicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), 393–422. 10.1075/tsl.115.15cri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.15cri [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft, William
    2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dahl, Östen
    2001 Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere. InJoan Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 471–480. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.24dah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.24dah [Google Scholar]
  14. Daniels, Don
    2006 Papuan Languages Collection. Archival collection, 1071 items. Pacific and Regional Archive for Digital Sources in Endangered Cultures (PARADISEC). catalog.paradisec.org.au/collections/DD1
  15. 2015 A reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, lexicon, and morphosyntax. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara Ph.D. dissertation.
  16. 2016 Magɨ: An undocumented language of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics55(1). 199–224. 10.1353/ol.2016.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2016.0004 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2017 A method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction. Studies in Language41(3). 577–614. 10.1075/sl.41.3.02dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.41.3.02dan [Google Scholar]
  18. 2020Grammatical reconstruction: The Sogeram languages of New Guinea. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110616217
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110616217 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2021 The issue of arbitrariness in syntactic reconstruction. Folia Linguistica Historica551. 393–428. 10.1515/flin‑2021‑2021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2021-2021 [Google Scholar]
  20. Daniels, Don, Danielle Barth & Wolfgang Barth
    2019 Subgrouping the Sogeram languages: A critical appraisal of historical glottometry. Journal of Historical Linguistics9(1). 92–127. 10.1075/jhl.17011.dan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.17011.dan [Google Scholar]
  21. D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
    2014 Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?Journal of Pragmatics601. 89–102. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. Evans, Nicholas
    1985 Kayardild: The language of the Bentinck Islanders of North West Queensland. Canberra: Australian National University Ph.D. dissertation.
  23. 2007 Insubordination and its uses. InIrina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. New York: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  24. Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe
    (eds.) 2016aInsubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2016b The dynamics of insubordination: An overview. InNicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), 1–38. 10.1075/tsl.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115 [Google Scholar]
  26. Foley, William A.
    1986The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2010 Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. InIsabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 27–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.121.02fol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.02fol [Google Scholar]
  28. Haiman, John
    1978 Conditionals are topics. Language54(3). 564–589. 10.1353/lan.1978.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1978.0009 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva
    2016 On insubordination and cooptation. InNicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), 39–63. 10.1075/tsl.115.02hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.02hei [Google Scholar]
  30. Horie, Kaoru
    2011 Versatility of nominalizations: Where Japanese and Korean contrast. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), 473–496. 10.1075/tsl.96.17hor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.17hor [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva
    2011 On thetical grammar. Studies in Language35(4). 852–897. 10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaufman, Daniel
    2011 Exclamatives and temporal nominalizations in Austronesian. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), 721–754. 10.1075/tsl.96.25kau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.25kau [Google Scholar]
  33. Kratochvíl, František
    2011 Discourse-structuring functions of Abui demonstratives. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), 757–788. 10.1075/tsl.96.26kra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.26kra [Google Scholar]
  34. Kulick, Don
    1992Language shift and cultural reproduction: Socialization, self, and syncretism in a Papua New Guinean village. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. 2019A death in the rainforest: How a language and a way of life came to an end in Papua New Guinea. Chapel Hill: Algonquin.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lehmann, Christian
    1988 Towards a typology of clause linkage. InJohn Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 181–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.18.09leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh [Google Scholar]
  37. 2008 Information structure and grammaticalization. InElena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds.), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization, 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.77.12leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.12leh [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, Hongyong & Yang Gu
    2011 Nominalization in Nuosu Yi. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), 255–287. 10.1075/tsl.96.11liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.11liu [Google Scholar]
  39. Matisoff, James A.
    1972 Lahu nominalization, relativization, and genetivization. InJohn P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, 237–257. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Michaelis, Laura
    2001 Exclamative constructions. InMartin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals, vol.21, 1038–1050. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mithun, Marianne
    2008 The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language84(1). 69–119. 10.1353/lan.2008.0054
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2008.0054 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2016a Shifting finiteness in nominalization: From definitization to refinitization. InClaudine Chamoreau & Zarina Estrada-Fernández (eds.), Finiteness and nominalization, 297–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.113.12mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.113.12mit [Google Scholar]
  43. 2016b How fascinating! Insubordinate exclamations. InNicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), 367–392. 10.1075/tsl.115.14mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.115.14mit [Google Scholar]
  44. 2019 Sources and mechanisms. InKarin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), 29–54. 10.1515/9783110638288‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288-002 [Google Scholar]
  45. Noonan, Michael
    1997 Versatile nominalizations. InJoan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 373–394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.21noo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.21noo [Google Scholar]
  46. Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström
    2018 The Trans New Guinea family. InBill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area: A comprehensive guide, 21–195. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Post, Mark W.
    2011 Nominalization and nominalization-based constructions in Galo. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), 255–287. 10.1075/tsl.96.09pos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.09pos [Google Scholar]
  48. Potsdam, Eric
    2011 Expressing exclamatives in Malagasy. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), 659–683. 10.1075/tsl.96.23pot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.23pot [Google Scholar]
  49. Reesink, Ger
    1987Structures and their functions in Usan: A Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.13
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.13 [Google Scholar]
  50. 1994 Domain-creating constructions in Papuan languages. InGer Reesink (ed.), Topics in descriptive Papuan linguistics (Semaian 10), 98–121. Leiden: Vakgroep Talen en Culturen van Zuidoost-Azië en Oceanië Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2014 Topic management and clause combination in the Papuan language Usan. InRik van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana Vilacy Galucio (eds.), Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences, 231–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.105.08ree
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.105.08ree [Google Scholar]
  52. Rhee, Seongha
    2011 Nominalization and stance marking in Korean. InFoong Ha Yap, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona (eds.), 393–422. 10.1075/tsl.96.14rhe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96.14rhe [Google Scholar]
  53. Roberts, John R.
    1997 Switch-reference in Papua New Guinea: A preliminary survey. InAndrew Pawley (ed.), Papers in Papuan linguistics31, 101–241. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sansiñena, María Sol, Hendrik De Smet & Bert Cornillie
    2015 Between subordinate and insubordinate: Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses. Journal of Pragmatics771. 3–19. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sarvasy, Hannah
    2015 Breaking the clause chains: Non-canonical medial clauses in Nungon. Studies in Language39(3). 664–697. 10.1075/sl.39.3.05sar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.3.05sar [Google Scholar]
  56. Schapper, Antoinette & Lila San Roque
    2011 Demonstratives and non-embedded nominalisations in three Papuan languages of the Timor-Alor-Pantar family. Studies in Language35(2). 380–408. 10.1075/sl.35.2.05sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.2.05sch [Google Scholar]
  57. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    2019 What is nominalization? Towards the theoretical foundations of nominalization. InRoberto Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani & David W. Fleck (eds.), Nominalization in languages of the Americas, 15–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.124.02shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.124.02shi [Google Scholar]
  58. Shopen, Timothy
    (ed.) 2007Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn.Vol.II1: Complex constructions. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Struckmeier, Volker & Sebastian Kaiser
    2019 When insubordination is an artefact (of sentence type theories). InKarin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), 320–348. 10.1515/9783110638288‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288-011 [Google Scholar]
  60. Tonhauser, Judith, David Beaver, Craige Roberts & Mandy Simons
    2013 Toward a taxonomy of projective content. Language89(1). 66–109. 10.1353/lan.2013.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0001 [Google Scholar]
  61. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2017 ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language and Linguistics21(2). 289–310. 10.1017/S1360674317000144
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000144 [Google Scholar]
  62. Van linden, An & Freek Van de Velde
    2014 (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic-pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics601. 226–250. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.022 [Google Scholar]
  63. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, Sarah D’Hertefelt & An Van linden
    2012 A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch. Studies in Language36(1). 123–153. 10.1075/sl.36.1.04ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.1.04ver [Google Scholar]
  64. Vries, Lourens de
    2006 Areal pragmatics of New Guinea: Thematization, distribution and recapitulative linkage in Papuan narratives. Journal of Pragmatics38(6). 811–828. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  65. Wiemer, Björn
    2019 On illusory insubordination and semi-insubordination in Slavic: Independent infinitives, clause-initial particles and predicatives put to the test. InKarin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), 107–166. 10.1515/9783110638288‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110638288-005 [Google Scholar]
  66. Yap, Foong Ha & Karen Grunow-Hårsta
    2010 Non-referential uses of nominalization constructions: Asian perspectives. Language and Linguistics Compass4(12). 1154–1175. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00250.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00250.x [Google Scholar]
  67. Yap, Foong Ha, Karen Grunow-Hårsta & Janick Wrona
    (eds.) 2011Nominalization in Asian languages: Diachronic and typological perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.96
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.96 [Google Scholar]
  68. Z’graggen, John A.
    1971Classificatory and typological studies in languages of the Madang District. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 1975a The Madang-Adelbert Range Sub-Phylum. InStephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papuan languages and the New Guinea linguistic scene, 569–612. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 1975bThe languages of the Madang District, Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 1980A comparative word list of the Southern Adelbert Range languages, Madang Province, Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23055.dan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.23055.dan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error