Volume 24, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper traces the recurrence and manipulation of devices in monologic narrative texts produced by university students based on a semi-structured elicitation. It focuses on a detailed analysis of multiple texts produced by different speaker-writers of Hebrew, to illustrate the function of structural resonance of both clauses and combinations of clauses (Clause Packages). The analyses show that while lexical devices reflect a more distanced (less evaluative) discourse stance ( Berman 2005 ), the use of creative resonance ( Du Bois 2014 ) between syntactic structures can either enhance or undermine the narrator’s own explicit perspective on events. Stance is thus not only highlighted by resonance in monologic texts (Sakita this issue); in fact, stance is engaged with in a way that is very similar to what has been illustrated for dialogue (Dori-Hacohen this issue; Dutra this issue; Nir & Zima this issue). It is suggested that the power of this engagement can be fully assessed only if lexical and syntactic resonance are systematically analyzed.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agha, Asif
    2007Language and social relations. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anward, Jan
    2004 Lexeme recycled: How categories emerge from interaction. Logos and Language5(2). 31–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bazzanella, Carla
    1993 Dialogic repetition. DialoganalyseIV. 285–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2011 Redundancy, repetition, and intensity in discourse. Language Sciences33(2). 243–254. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berman, Ruth A.
    1986Repetition and recurrence. Unpublished manuscript. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1997 Narrative theory and narrative development: The Labovian impact. Journal of Narrative and Life History7. 235–244. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.29nar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.29nar [Google Scholar]
  7. (ed.) 2005Developing discourse stance across adolescence. Special issue ofJournal of Pragmatics37(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv
    2004 Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language31. 339–380. doi: 10.1017/S0305000904006038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006038 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2007 Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes43. 79–120. doi: 10.1080/01638530709336894
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336894 [Google Scholar]
  10. Berman, Ruth A. & Bracha Nir-Sagiv 2009 Clause-packaging in narratives: A crosslinguistic developmental study. In Jiansheng Guo , Elena Lieven , Nancy Budwig , Susan Ervin-Tripp , Keiko Nakamura & Seyda Özçalişkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan I. Slobin, 149–162. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berman, Ruth A. , Hrafnhildur Ragnarsdóttir & Sven Strömqvist
    2002 Discourse stance. Written Language and Literacy5(2). 255–290. doi: 10.1075/wll.5.2.06ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.5.2.06ber [Google Scholar]
  12. Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin
    1994Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Berman, Ruth A. & Ludo Verhoeven
    2002 Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy5(1). 1–43. doi: 10.1075/wll.5.1.02ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.5.1.02ber [Google Scholar]
  14. Biber, Douglas
    1995Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brewer, William F. & Edward H. Lichtenstein
    1982 Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics6(5). 473–486. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(82)90021‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(82)90021-2 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brȏne, Gert & Elisabeth Zima
    2014 Towards a dialogic construction grammar: Ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics25(3). 457–495. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0027 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bruner, Jerome
    1986Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    1999 Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. In Wolfram Bublitz , Uta Lenk & Eija Ventola (eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it, 11–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.63.05cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63.05cou [Google Scholar]
  19. Cristofaro, Sonia
    2003Subordination. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  21. 2014 Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics25(3). 359–410. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
  22. In prep. Reasons to resonate: Motivating Dialogic Syntax.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Du Bois, John W. , R. Peter Hobson & Jessica A. Hobson
    2014 Dialogic resonance and intersubjective engagement in autism. Cognitive Linguistics25(3). 411–441. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0025 [Google Scholar]
  24. Du Bois, John W. & Rachel Giora
    2014 Dialogic Resonance: Activating affinities across utterances. Cognitive Linguistics25(3). 351–557.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Eggins, Suzanne & J. R. Martin
    1997 Genres and registers of discourse. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as structure and process, 239–256. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Facchinetti, Roberta , Frank R. Palmer & Manfred G. Krug
    (eds.) 2003Modality in contemporary English. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110895339
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895339 [Google Scholar]
  27. Grimshaw, Allen D.
    2003 Genres, registers, and contexts of discourse. In Arthur C. Graesser , Morton Ann Gernsbacher & Susan R. Goldman (eds.), Handbook of discourse processes, 25–82. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Haiman, John & Sandra A. Thompson
    (eds.) 1988Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18 [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliday, M.A.K.
    1994An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hermans, Hubert J.M. & Thorsten Gieser (eds.) 2011Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139030434
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030434 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hinds, John
    1979 Organizational patterns in discourse. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax, 135–158. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hunston, Susan
    2010Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle
    1956Fundamentals of language. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Johnstone, Barbara
    (ed.) 1994Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Volume1. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kiesling, Scott F.
    2005 Norms of sociocultural meaning in language: Indexicality, stance, and cultural models. In Scott F. Kiesling & Christina B. Paulston (eds.), Intercultural discourse and communication: The essential readings, 92–104. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470758434.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758434.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  37. Labov, William
    1972Language in the inner city. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1997 Some further steps in narrative history. Journal of Narrative and Life History7. 394–415. doi: 10.1075/jnlh.7.49som
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.7.49som [Google Scholar]
  39. Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky
    1967 Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, Volume1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lempert, Michael
    2008 The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society37(4). 569–592. doi: 10.1017/S0047404508080779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080779 [Google Scholar]
  42. Longacre, Robert E.
    1983The grammar of discourse. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Maschler, Yael & Bracha Nir
    2014 Complementation in linear and dialogic syntax: The case of Hebrew divergently aligned discourse. Cognitive Linguistics25(3). 523–557. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0029 [Google Scholar]
  44. Nir, Bracha
    2008Clause packages as constructions in developing narrative discourse. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv UniversityPhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2014 Clause combining across grammars: A contrastive analysis of L1 and L2 construal of discourse organization. Constructions and Frames6(2). 232–265. doi: 10.1075/cf.6.2.05nir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.6.2.05nir [Google Scholar]
  46. Nir, Bracha & Ruth A. Berman
    2010 Complex syntax as a window on contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Pragmatics42(3). 744–765. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  47. Nir, Bracha , Gonen Dori-Hacohen & Yael Maschler
    2014 Formulations on Israeli political talk radio: From actions and sequences to stance via dialogic resonance. Discourse Studies16(4). 534–571. doi: 10.1177/1461445613519525
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613519525 [Google Scholar]
  48. Norrick, Neal R.
    1987 Functions of repetition in conversation. Text: Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse7(3). 245–264. doi: 10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.245
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.245 [Google Scholar]
  49. 1994 Repetition as a conversational joking strategy. Advances in Discourse Processes48. 15–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2007 Conversational storytelling. In David Herman (ed.), The Cambridge companion to narrative, 127–141. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521856965.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521856965.009 [Google Scholar]
  51. Paltridge, Brian
    1997Genre, frames and writing in research setting. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.45 [Google Scholar]
  52. Perrin, Laurent , Denise Deshaies & Claude Paradis 2003 Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetitions in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics35(12). 1843–1860. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00117‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00117-6 [Google Scholar]
  53. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Maxwell J. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 79–112. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Rauniomaa, Mirka
    2008Recovery through repetition. Oulu: University of OuluPhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Reinhart, Tanya
    1984 Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics22. 779–809.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 1995 From text to meaning: strategies of evaluation. In Yeshayahu Shen (ed.), Cognitive aspects of narrative structure, 4–37. Tel Aviv: Porter Institute [in Hebrew].
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Riloff, Ellen & Janyce Wiebe
    2003 Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. InProceedings of the 2003 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 105–112. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.3115/1119355.1119369
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1119355.1119369 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sakita, Tomoko I.
    2006 Parallelism in conversation: Resonance, schematization, and extension from the perspective of Dialogic Syntax and Cognitive Linguistics. Pragmatics & Cognition14. 467–500. doi: 10.1075/pc.14.3.03sak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.14.3.03sak [Google Scholar]
  59. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1981 Tense variation in narrative. Language57(1). 45–62. doi: 10.1353/lan.1981.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1981.0011 [Google Scholar]
  60. Siromaa, Maarit
    2012 Resonance in conversational second stories: A dialogic resource for stance-taking. Text & Talk4(4). 525–545
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Steen, Gerard
    1999 Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes28. 109–120. doi: 10.1080/01638539909545075
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539909545075 [Google Scholar]
  62. Takanashi, Hiroko
    2000 Stance differential in parallelism: Dialogic syntax of argumentation in Japanese. InPragmatics: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, 570–582.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Tannen, Deborah
    1982 Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives. Language58. 1–21. doi: 10.2307/413530
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413530 [Google Scholar]
  64. 1984Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 1987 Repetition in conversation: Towards a poetics of talk. Language63(3). 574–605. doi: 10.2307/415006
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415006 [Google Scholar]
  66. 1989Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Thompson, Susan
    1994 Aspects of cohesion in monologue. Applied Linguistics15(1). 58–75. doi: 10.1093/applin/15.1.58
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.1.58 [Google Scholar]
  68. Thompson, Geoff & Susan Hunston
    (eds.) 2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Verhagen, Arie
    2001 Subordination and discourse segmentation revisited, or: Why matrix clauses may be more dependent than complements. In Ted Sanders , Joost Schilperoord & Wilbert Spooren (eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and psychological aspects, 337–357. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.8.18ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.18ver [Google Scholar]
  70. Virtanen, Tuija & Helena Halmari
    2005 Persuasion across genres: Emerging perspectives. In Helena Halmari & Tuija Virtanen (eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach, 3–24. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.130.03vir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.130.03vir [Google Scholar]
  71. Zima, Elisabeth , Gert Brȏne , Kurt Feyaerts & Paul Sambre 2009Ce n’est pas tres beau ce que vous avez dit! Resonance activation in French parliamentary debates. Discours4. discours.revues.org/7337. doi: 10.4000/discours.7337
    https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.7337 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error