1887
image of A computational approach to mapping replacement processes in language change

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores the advantages of using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) as a computational approach to mapping replacement in language change. Historical linguistics assumes that when a construction replaces another construction, this process is gradual, affecting certain usage contexts before others. This model of replacement predicts that these usage contexts play a greater role for the decrease in usage frequency of the replaced construction than other contexts. As a case study, I examine the replacement of the perfect auxiliary ‘be’ with ‘have’ in the history of Spanish using a combination of LCA and regression analysis. Starting from the eight usage contexts identified with LCA, I observe changes in the preference for or to be used in these contexts. By using the predicted probability of assignment to these contexts as a dependent variable, I provide proof of significant replacement of with , but also of with , in contexts with perfective meanings. The absence of replacement in the remaining contexts leads me to postulate that underwent both functional specialization and renewal as its usage frequency declined. From a theoretical perspective, this study provides empirical evidence for a key assumption in historical linguistics, namely that replacement processes occur locally.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24026.ros
2026-01-29
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/fol.24026.ros/fol.24026.ros.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24026.ros&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Acosta, Diego de
    2011 Rethinking the genesis of the Romance periphrastic perfect. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.28.2.01dea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.28.2.01dea [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen, Erling B.
    1982 Latent structure analysis: A survey. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Batlle, Mar
    2002L’expressió dels temps compostos en la veu mitjana i la passiva pronominal: El procés de substitució de l’auxiliar ésser per haver. Barcelona: L’Abadia de Montserrat.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benveniste, Émile
    1966 “Être” et “avoir” dans leur fonctions linguistiques. InÉmile Benveniste (ed.), Problèmes de linguistique générale, –. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, Joan L.
    2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency. InRichard Janda & Brian Joseph (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, –. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cennamo, Michela
    1998 The loss of the voice dimension between Late Latin and Early Romance. InMonika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds.), Historical linguistics 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 10–17 August 1997, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.164.06cen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.164.06cen [Google Scholar]
  8. 2008 The rise and development of analytic perfects in Italo-Romance. InThórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.113.05cen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.113.05cen [Google Scholar]
  9. Coussé, Evie
    2014 Lexical expansion in the have and be perfect in Dutch: A constructionist prototype account. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.31.2.01cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.31.2.01cou [Google Scholar]
  10. Crosthwaite, Peter
    2023 Corpus linguistics: Mixed-methods research. InCarol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, –. Malden, MA: Wiley. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal20019
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal20019 [Google Scholar]
  11. De Smet, Hendrik
    2012 The course of actualization. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056 [Google Scholar]
  12. Drinka, Bridget
    2013 Sources of auxiliation in the perfects of Europe. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.37.3.06dri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.06dri [Google Scholar]
  13. Feltgen, Quentin, Benjamin Fagard & Jean-Pierre Nadal
    2017 Modeling language change. InFrancesco LaMantia, Ignazio Licata & Pietro Perconti (eds.), Language in complexity: The emerging meaning, –. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑29483‑4_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29483-4_3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Formentin, Vittorio
    2001 L’ausiliazione perfettiva in antico napoletano. Archivio Glottologico Italiano(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gillmann, Melitta
    2015 Auxiliary selection in closely related languages: The case of German and Dutch. InRolf Kailuweit & Malte Rosemeyer (eds.), Auxiliary selection revisited: Gradience and gradualness, –. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110348866‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110348866-012 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2016Perfektkonstruktionen mit haben und sein: Eine Korpusuntersuchung im Althochdeutschen, Altsächsischen und Neuhochdeutschen. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110492170
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110492170 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillmann, Melitta & Alexander Werth
    2024 Hybrider Status des sein-Perfekts zwischen stativ-resultativer und perfektischer Lesart: Eine Auswertung von Positionsverben in historischen Referenzkorpora des Deutschen. Germanistische Linguistik(). –. 10.5771/0072‑1492‑2024‑2‑181
    https://doi.org/10.5771/0072-1492-2024-2-181 [Google Scholar]
  18. Glynn, Dylan
    2014 The many uses of run. InDylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.43.05gly
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.43.05gly [Google Scholar]
  19. Gries, Stefan Th
    2003 Towards a corpus-based identification of prototypical instances of constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/arcl.1.02gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.1.02gri [Google Scholar]
  20. Gries, Stefan Th. & Dagmar Divjak
    2009 Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis. InVyvyan Evans & Stéphane Pourcel (eds.), New directions in Cognitive Linguistics, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.24.07gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.07gri [Google Scholar]
  21. Harris, Martin
    1982 The ‘past simple’ and the ‘present perfect’ in Romance. InNigel Vincent & Joe Cremona (eds.), Studies in the Romance verb: Essays offered to Joe Cremona on the occasion of his 60th birthday, –. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hilpert, Martin
    2021Ten lectures on Diachronic Construction Grammar: Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004446793
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446793 [Google Scholar]
  23. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal?InWalter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, –. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197440.1.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440.1.21 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jacob, Daniel
    1994Die Auxiliarisierung von habere. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Habilitation thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1996 Von der Subjekt-Relevanz zur Gegenwartsrelevanz: Gebrauch und Entwicklung der Perfektperiphrase aver + Partizip Perfekt Passiv im Altspanischen. Romanistisches Jahrbuch. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kailuweit, Rolf
    2018 Exaptation, refunctionalization, decapitalization: be + past participle with intransitive verbs in Medieval and Early Modern Spanish. Languages(). . 10.3390/languages3040043
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages3040043 [Google Scholar]
  27. Konvička, Martin & Ferdinand von Mengden
    . Forthcoming. Grammaticalization. InHilary Nesi & Petar Milin eds. International encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 3rd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑323‑95504‑1.01096‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95504-1.01096-6 [Google Scholar]
  28. Larsson, Ida
    2009Participles in time: The development of the perfect tense in Swedish. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lazarsfeld, Paul F.
    1950 The logical and mathematical foundation of Latent Structure Analysis. InSamuel A. Stouffer, Louis Guttman, Edward A. Suchmann, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, Shirley A. Star & John Clausen (eds.), Measurement and prediction, –. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lazarsfeld, Paul F. & Neil Henry
    1969Latent structure analysis. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ledgeway, Adam
    2003 L’estensione dell’ausiliare perfettivo avere nell’antico napoletano: Intransitività scissa condizionata da fattori modali. Archivo Glottologico Italiano. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2022 Residues and extensions of perfective auxiliary be: Modal conditioning. Languages(). e160. 10.3390/languages7030160
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030160 [Google Scholar]
  33. Linzer, Drew A. & Jeffrey B. Lewis
    2011 poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software(). –. 10.18637/jss.v042.i10
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i10 [Google Scholar]
  34. Llopis-Cardona, Ana & Salvador Pons Bordería
    2020 La gramaticalización de macho y tío/a como ciclo semántico-pragmático. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación. –. 10.5209/clac.68970
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.68970 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mackenzie, Ian
    2006Unaccusative verbs in Romance languages. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230627550
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627550 [Google Scholar]
  36. McFadden, Thomas & Artemis Alexiadou
    2010 Perfects, resultatives and auxiliaries in Early English. Linguistic Inquiry(). –. 10.1162/LING_a_00002
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Méndez García de Paredes, Elena
    2011 Si yo fuera estado allí, no fuera pasado eso: Pervivencia de un aparente arcaísmo en la lengua de Internet. InJosé Jesús Bustos Tovar, Rafael Cano Aguilar, Elena Méndez García de Paredes & Araceli López Serena (eds.), Sintaxis y análisis del discurso hablado en español: Homenaje a Antonio Narbona, –. Sevilla: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Nylund-Gibson, Karen & Andrew Young Choi
    2018 Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science. –. 10.1037/tps0000176
    https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176 [Google Scholar]
  39. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, Álvaro S.
    2002 Auxiliación con ser de verbos intransitivos de movimiento (1450–1600): El caso de ir(se). Res Diachronicae. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta, Álvaro S. & Javier Rodríguez Molina
    2008 En busca del tiempo perdido: Historia y uso de hube cantado. InÁngeles Carrasco Gutiérrez (eds.), Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas, –. Madrid: Iberoamerica Vervuert. 10.31819/9783865278654‑009
    https://doi.org/10.31819/9783865278654-009 [Google Scholar]
  41. Oesterreicher, Wulf
    1992Se im Spanischen: Pseudoreflexivität, Diathese und Prototypikalität von semantischen Rollen. Romanistisches Jahrbuch. –. 10.1515/9783110244991.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110244991.237 [Google Scholar]
  42. Petré, Peter
    2010 The functions of weorðan and its loss in the past tense in Old and Middle English. English Language and Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1360674310000158
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674310000158 [Google Scholar]
  43. Pons Rodríguez, Lola
    2008 Las construcciones imitativas del “accusativus cum infinitivo”: Modelos latinos y consecuencias romances. Revista de Historia de la Lengua Española. –. 10.54166/rhle.2008.03.04
    https://doi.org/10.54166/rhle.2008.03.04 [Google Scholar]
  44. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. www.R-project.org. Last accessed on5 March 2024.
  45. RAE
    RAE (2022) Corpus diacrónico del español (CORDE). www.rae.es. Last accessed on23 October 2022.
  46. Rodríguez Molina, Javier
    2006Ser + participio en español antiguo: Perífrasis resultativa, no tiempo compuesto. InJosé Jesus Bustos Tovar & José Luis Girón Alchonchel (eds.), Actas del VI Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, –. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2010La gramaticalización de los tiempos compuestos en español antiguo: Cinco cambios diacrónicos. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rosemeyer, Malte
    2012 How to measure replacement: Auxiliary selection in Old Spanish bibles. Folia Linguistica Historica(). –. 10.1515/flih.2012.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2012.006 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2014Auxiliary selection in Spanish: Gradience, gradualness, and conservation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.155
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.155 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2016 Gradientes semánticos y sintácticos en la historia de la selección de auxiliares en español. InCarlota De Benito Moreno & Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta (eds.), En torno a ‘haber’: Construcciones, usos y variación desde el latín hasta la actualidad, –. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2022 Anteriors and resultatives in Old Spanish. InMar Garachana, Sandra Montserrat & Claus Pusch (eds.), From composite predicates to verbal periphrases in Romance languages, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ivitra.31.08ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.31.08ros [Google Scholar]
  52. 2024a Data-driven identification of situated meanings in corpus data using Latent Class Analysis. Open Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/opli‑2024‑0029
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2024-0029 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2024bData-driven identification of situated meanings in corpus data using Latent Class Analysis: Supplementary materials. Available online athttps://osf.io/ap3zk. Last accessed on7 July 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sankoff, David
    1988 Variable rules. InUlrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar & Klaus Mattheier (eds.), Berlin sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, Vol 2, –. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sankoff, Gillian & Pierrette Thibault
    1977 L’alternance entre les auxiliaires avoir et être en français parlé à Montréal. Langue Francaise(). –. 10.3406/lfr.1977.4818
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1977.4818 [Google Scholar]
  56. Shannon, Thomas F.
    1995 Toward a cognitive explanation of perfect auxiliary variation: Some modal and aspectual effects in the history of Germanic. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics & Literatures(). –. 10.1017/S1040820700001578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1040820700001578 [Google Scholar]
  57. Stolova, Natalya I.
    2006 Split intransitivity in Old Spanish: Irreals and negation factors. Revue roumaine de linguistique(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
    2013 Diachronic probabilistic grammar. English Language and Linguistics(). –. 10.17960/ell.2013.19.3.002
    https://doi.org/10.17960/ell.2013.19.3.002 [Google Scholar]
  59. Timberlake, Alan
    1977 Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. InCharles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, –. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 10.7560/750357‑006
    https://doi.org/10.7560/750357-006 [Google Scholar]
  60. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review(). –. 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24026.ros
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24026.ros
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error