1887
image of Negative conditionals in English
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper examines the register variation of negative conditionals in English. The main expression types for English negative conditionals are negative -conditionals and -conditionals. These two constructions were studied in five registers of the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). The results show that negative -conditionals differ from -conditionals in several respects. -conditionals contain few of the hallmarks of conditional constructions: they seldom appear in initial position, they shun the use of past tense or subjunctive morphology to indicate hypotheticality or counterfactuality, and their main clauses are almost never introduced by . Different registers are found to be associated with differences in clause order, the syntactic rank of the clause, tense choice in both protasis and apodosis, and the polarity of the apodosis. There are also phraseological patterns that are highly register-specific, such as scalar or the construction. The grammar of -conditionals is found to be less variable, and -conditionals also display less phraseological patterning. The findings highlight the interplay between register variation and degrees of schematicity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24045.sil
2026-05-12
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Davies, Mark
    2008–The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). March 2020 version. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ariel, Mira
    2019Or constructions: Code, inference and cue too. Constructions and Frames(). –. 10.1075/cf.00028.ari
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00028.ari [Google Scholar]
  3. Athanasiadou, Angeliki & René Dirven
    1996 Typology of if-clauses. InEugene H. Casad (ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, –. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110811421.609
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811421.609 [Google Scholar]
  4. 1997 Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality. InAngeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), –. 10.1075/cilt.143.05ath
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.05ath [Google Scholar]
  5. (eds.) 1997On conditionals again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.143
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143 [Google Scholar]
  6. Auwera, Johan van der
    1997 Conditional perfection. InAngeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, Douglas
    1989 A typology of English texts. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
    1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bossuyt, Tom & Bastian Persohn
    . In preparation. Exceptive conditionals in cross-linguistic perspective: A first survey.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, Joan L.
    1995 The semantic development of past tense modals in English. InJoan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.32.22byb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.32.22byb [Google Scholar]
  11. Carston, Robyn
    2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Malden: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470754603
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754603 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dancygier, Barbara
    2002 Mental space embeddings, counterfactuality, and the use of unless. English Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1360674302000278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674302000278 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
    2005Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511486760
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486760 [Google Scholar]
  14. Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed
    2000 The semantics and pragmatics of unless. English Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S136067430000023X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067430000023X [Google Scholar]
  15. 2001Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110851748
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851748 [Google Scholar]
  16. Diessel, Holger
    2001 The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses: A typological study. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2001.0152
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0152 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2019The grammar network: How linguistic structure is shaped by language use. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108671040
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ferguson, Gibson
    2001 If you pop over there: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes(). –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00027‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00027-7 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fintel, Kai von
    1992 Exceptive conditionals: The meaning of unless. North East Linguistics Society(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2011 Conditionals. InKlaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Volume 2, –. Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ford, Cecilia E. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1986 Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English. InElizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), On conditionals, –. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.019 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fujita, Takao
    1987 Counterfactual unless. English Linguistics. –. 10.9793/elsj1984.4.342
    https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.4.342 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gabrielatos, Costas
    2019If-conditionals and modality: Frequency patterns and theoretical explanations. Journal of English Linguistics(). –. 10.1177/0075424219875994
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424219875994 [Google Scholar]
  24. Geis, Michael L.
    1973If and unless. InBraj B. Kachru, Robert B. Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli & Sol Saporta (eds.), Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, –. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Geis, Michael L. & Arnold M. Zwicky
    1971 On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Grice, H. P.
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts, –. New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Haiman, John
    1983 Iconic and economic motivation. Language(). –. 10.2307/413373
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413373 [Google Scholar]
  28. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hasselgård, Hilde
    2010Adjunct adverbials in English. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511676253
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676253 [Google Scholar]
  30. Horn, Laurence R.
    1989A natural history of negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kortmann, Bernd
    1997Adverbial subordination: A typology and history of adverbial subordinators based on European languages. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110812428
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812428 [Google Scholar]
  33. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lastres-López, Cristina
    2018If-insubordination in spoken British English: Syntactic and pragmatic properties. Language Sciences. –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.009 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2020 Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  36. Potts, Christopher
    2005The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
    1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2025R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Reuneker, Alex
    2017 Sentence-medial if-clauses in Dutch: Frequency, semantic domain and syntactic integration. Nederlandse Taalkunde(). –. 10.5117/NEDTAA2017.1.REUN
    https://doi.org/10.5117/NEDTAA2017.1.REUN [Google Scholar]
  40. 2022 Connecting conditionals: A corpus-based approach to conditional constructions in Dutch. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden doctoral dissertation.
  41. 2023 Assessing classification reliability of conditionals in discourse. Argumentation(). –. 10.1007/s10503‑023‑09614‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09614-9 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sinclair, John McH
    2004Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Sommerer, Lotte
    2023 If that’s what she said, then that’s what she said: A usage-based, constructional analysis of pleonastic conditionals in English. Corpus Pragmatics(). –. 10.1007/s41701‑023‑00148‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-023-00148-9 [Google Scholar]
  44. Sullivan, Karen
    2011If and when it’s a construction…Constructions and Frames(). –. 10.1075/cf.3.2.04sul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.3.2.04sul [Google Scholar]
  45. Sweetser, Eve
    1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  46. Thompson, Sandra A., Robert E. Longacre & Shin Ja J. Hwang
    2007 Adverbial clauses. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2: Complex constructions, –. 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tottie, Gunnel
    1991Negation in English speech and writing: A study in variation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1997 UNLESS and BUT conditionals: A historical perspective. InAngeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), –. 10.1075/cilt.143.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.09clo [Google Scholar]
  49. Wickham, Hadley
    2016ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24045.sil
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24045.sil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: register ; subordination ; conditional ; corpus linguistics ; negation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error