1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Functions of Language
  4. Volume 32, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 32, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-998X
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9765
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper gives a unified account of noun incorporation in Present-Day English from a constructional and typological perspective. We first investigate how productive it really is, given the contrasting statements in the literature. Using data from the WordBanks Online corpus, we show that the process is remarkably productive: it is highly extensible, with high type frequency and a broad variety of possible semantic relations between the incorporated noun and its incorporating verb. It is also a regular process, with noun incorporated verbs found in all possible forms, including finite ones. Second, since noun incorporation is productive in English, we investigate how it fits in existing typologies of noun incorporation, more specifically the one proposed by Mithun (1984). We show that types I (lexical compounding) and II (case manipulation) are uncompromisingly available in English, while type III (discourse manipulation) is restricted; type IV (classificatory incorporation) is attested even if not resulting in a fully-fledged nominal classification system. We argue that these differences relate to the typological profile of English, viz. as an analytic language with overtly expressed arguments, contrary to the polysynthetic languages studied by Mithun. The availability of types II-IV incidentally further substantiates the productivity of the process, since these types typically develop later than type I. More generally, this study contributes to our understanding of noun incorporation and its characteristics in more analytic languages, which are understudied in this respect, and provides one of the few detailed, corpus-based studies of noun incorporation in an Indo-European language, where it is overall rare.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24048.lou
2025-11-18
2025-12-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/fol.24048.lou
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2007 Typological distinctions in word-formation. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn. Volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 1–65. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Mark
    1988 Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 1996 The polysynthesis parameter. New York, NY: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780195093070.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195093070.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barðdal, Jóhanna
    2008 Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.8 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barrie, Michael
    2011 Dynamic Antisymmetry and the syntax of noun incorporation. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑1570‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1570-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrie, Michael & Bettina Spreng
    2009 Noun incorporation and the progressive in German. Lingua1191. 374–388. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.020
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.020 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrie, Michael & Audrey Li
    2015 The semantics of (pseudo) incorporation and case. InOlga Borik & Berit Gehrke (eds.), 159–188. 10.1163/9789004291089_006
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291089_006 [Google Scholar]
  8. Booij, Geert
    2008 Pseudo-incorporation in Dutch. Groniger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik461. 3–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Borik, Olga & Berit Gehrke
    (eds.) 2015 The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 2015 An introduction to the syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. InOlga Borik & Berit Gehrke (eds.), 1–43. 10.1163/9789004291089_002
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291089_002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bricker, Victoria
    1978 Antipassive constructions in Yucatec Maya. InNora C. England (ed.), Papers in Mayan linguistics, 3–24. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bybee, Joan
    1995 Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes101. 425–455. 10.1080/01690969508407111
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chafe, Wallace
    1977 Caddo texts. InDouglas R. Parks (ed.), Caddoan texts, 27–43. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Collins WordbanksOnline, HarperCollins
    Collins WordbanksOnline, HarperCollins. www.collinslanguage.com/content-solutions/wordbanks
  15. Dahl, Östen
    2004 The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.71
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.71 [Google Scholar]
  16. Davidse, Kristin & Tine Breban
    2019 A cognitive-functional approach to the order of adjectives in the English noun phrase. Linguistics57(2). 327–371. 10.1515/ling‑2019‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Smet, Hendrik
    2020 What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics31(2). 251–278. 10.1515/cog‑2019‑0026
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2019-0026 [Google Scholar]
  18. De Smet, Hendrik, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde
    (eds.) 2015 On multiple source constructions in language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.79
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.79 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ebert, Karin H.
    2000 Progressive markers in Germanic languages. InÖsten Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 605–653. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1515/9783110197099.4.605
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.4.605 [Google Scholar]
  20. Feist, Jim
    2013 Noun incorporation in English. Functions of Language20(2). 159–184. 10.1075/fol.20.2.02fei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20.2.02fei [Google Scholar]
  21. 2016 Semantic structure in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.73
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.73 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gerdts, Donna B.
    1998 Incorporation. InAndrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 84–100. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hall, Robert A., Jr.
    1956 How we noun-incorporate in English. American Speech31(2). 83–88. 10.2307/453432
     https://doi.org/10.2307/453432 [Google Scholar]
  24. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1985 An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Haspelmath, Martin
    2002 Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 2025 Compound and incorporation constructions as combinations of unexpandable roots. Journal of Word Formation9(1). 1–23. 10.21248/zwjw.2025.1.124
     https://doi.org/10.21248/zwjw.2025.1.124 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lehmann, Christian & Elisabeth Verhoeven
    2005 Noun incorporation and participation. A typological study on participant association with particular reference to Yucatec Maya. InChristian Lehmann (ed.), Typological studies in participation, 105–188. Berlin: Akademie. 10.1524/9783050080536.105
     https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050080536.105 [Google Scholar]
  28. Louagie, Dana & An Van linden
    2022 Noun incorporation in English: Diachronic case studies. Paper presented at theBelgian Linguists’ Day, Liège, 21 October 2022.
  29. Massam, Diane
    2009 Noun incorporation: Essentials and extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass3(4). 1076–1096. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2009.00140.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00140.x [Google Scholar]
  30. McGregor, William
    1997 Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198236887.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198236887.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. McKenzie, Andrew
    2022 Mediating functions and the semantics of noun incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory401. 505–540. 10.1007/s11049‑021‑09511‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09511-4 [Google Scholar]
  32. Merlan, Francesca
    1976 Noun incorporation and discourse reference in modern Nahuatl. International Journal of American Linguistics421. 177–191. 10.1086/465415
     https://doi.org/10.1086/465415 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mithun, Marianne
    1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language60(4). 847–894. 10.1353/lan.1984.0038
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1984.0038 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2000 Incorporation. InGeert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan, Wolfgang Kesselheim & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), 1. Halbband: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, 916–928. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110111286.1.12.916
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110111286.1.12.916 [Google Scholar]
  35. Olthof, Marieke
    2020 Formal variation in incorporation: A typological study and a unified approach. Linguistics58(1). 131–205. 10.1515/ling‑2019‑0036
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0036 [Google Scholar]
  36. Olthof, Marieke, Eva van Lier, Tjeu Claessen, Swintha Danielsen, Katharina Haude, Nico Lehmann, Maarten Mous, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Eline Visser, Marine Vuillermet & Arok Wolvengrey
    2021 Verb-based restrictions on noun incorporation across languages. Linguistic Typology25(2). 211–256. 10.1515/lingty‑2020‑2054
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2054 [Google Scholar]
  37. Pinker, Steven
    1999 Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York, NY: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Plag, Ingo
    2003 Word-formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511841323
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rice, Sally & Gary Prideaux
    1991 Event-packing: The case of object incorporation in English. InLaurel A. Sutton, Christopher Johnson, with Ruth Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on the grammar of event structure, 283–298. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1611
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1611 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rodrigues, Aryon Dall’Igna
    . Manuscript. Estrutura do Tupinamba. Universidade Estadual Campinas, Brazil.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rosen, Sara Thomas
    1989 Two types of noun incorporation: A lexical analysis. Language65(2). 294–317. 10.2307/415334
     https://doi.org/10.2307/415334 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sapir, Edward
    1911 The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist13(2). 250–282. 10.1525/aa.1911.13.2.02a00060
     https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1911.13.2.02a00060 [Google Scholar]
  43. Smirnova, Elizaveta & Svetlana Shustova
    2017 Noun-incorporation in English as a valency-changing device. Lingua1941. 15–25. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.05.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  44. Stvan, Laurel Smith
    2009 Semantic incorporation as an account for some bare singular count noun uses in English. Lingua1191. 314–333. 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.017
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.017 [Google Scholar]
  45. Van linden, An
    2023 Harakmbut. InPatience Epps and Lev Michael (eds.), Amazonian languages: An international handbook. Language isolates, Vol. 1: Aikanã to Kandozi-Shapra, 441–481. Berlin: Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Van linden, An & Dana Louagie
    . In preparation. Noun incorporation in English: A diachronic perspective. University of Liège, Belgium.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Weggelaar, C.
    1986 Noun incorporation in Dutch. International Journal of American Linguistics52(3). 301–305. 10.1086/466024
     https://doi.org/10.1086/466024 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24048.lou
Loading
Noun incorporation in English
Functions of Language 32, 224 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24048.lou
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24048.lou
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24048.lou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): analogy; corpus-based; nominal classification; noun incorporation; productivity; typology

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error