1887
image of On the discourse marker yěshì ‘also’ in Chinese constructions of blame
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Blame is generally considered a social-cognitive act, in which the blamer expresses their negative evaluation and attitude to the ‘blamee’ and their actions. In the act of blame, the blamer takes a stance, presents it, and negotiates this stance with other participants within the discourse. Adopting a Construction Grammar approach, this paper identifies four constructions of blame in Modern Chinese that share a construction-initial sequence ‘ ’. Despite their formal similarity and the general function of expressing blame, the four constructions differ in syntax, detailed semantics, and pragmatic functions. Moreover, our analysis shows that, in interaction with the clauses that follow, construction-initial ‘ ’ marks an evaluative-affective stance, mitigates the effects of blame, and signals a stance shift in the discourse. In terms of discourse organization, it serves to introduce new and relevant information in the forthcoming discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24053.fan
2025-03-11
2025-03-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
    1988 Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes(). –. 10.1080/01638538809544689
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538809544689 [Google Scholar]
  2. Biezma, Maria & Kyle Rawlins
    2017 Rhetorical questions: Severing asking from questioning. InDan Burgdorf, Jacob Collard, Sireemas Maspong & Brynhildur Stefánsdóttir (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT). –. 10.3765/salt.v27i0.4155
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4155 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
    2007 Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.31.3.03boy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.3.03boy [Google Scholar]
  4. Caponigro, Ivano & Jon Sprouse
    2007 Rhetorical questions as questions. InLouise McNally & Estela Puig-Waldmüller (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao, Yuenren
    1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Jiajun
    2017 Dialogicity in dialogue: Deriving Chinese discourse marker bieshuo from the negative imperative. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2018 (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences. –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2018.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng, Siu-Pong & Sze-Wing Tang
    2022 Syntax of sentence-final particles in Chinese. InChu-Ren Huang, Yen-Hwei Lin, I-Hsuan Chen & Yu-Yin Hsu (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, –. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108329019.030
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329019.030 [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, William
    2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cui, Xiliang
    2024 Yanyu Xingwei Lilun Yu Yuqici De Gongneng Yiyi. ‘Speech Act Theory and the function-meaning of modal particles’. TCSOL Studies (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Du Bois, John W.
    2007 The stance triangle. InRobert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  12. Fang, Hongmei & Kees Hengeveld
    2022 Sentence-final particles in Mandarin. Studia Linguistica(). –. 10.1111/stul.12198
    https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12198 [Google Scholar]
  13. Feng, Yuan
    2012 ‘X + Yeshi (de)’ Jiegou Yanjiu. ‘A Study on the Structure X + Yeshi (de)’. Changchun: Jilin University MA Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitzmaurice, Susan
    2004 Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers. Discourse Studies(). –. 10.1177/1461445604046585
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604046585 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldberg, Adele
    1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Han, Chung-hye
    2002 Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua. –. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(01)00044‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hao, Ling
    2020Hudong shijiaoxia xiandai hanyu lichang biaoda yanjiu. ‘A study of stance expression in Modern Chinese from an interactive perspective’. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Haspelmath, Martin
    2017 Equative constructions in world-wide perspective. InYvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Similative and equative constructions, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.117.02has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117.02has [Google Scholar]
  20. Heine, Bernd
    2013 On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else?. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0048 [Google Scholar]
  21. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
    1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heine, Bernd & Gunther Kaltenböck
    2021 From clause to discourse marker: on the development of comment clauses. Language Sciences. –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101400
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2021.101400 [Google Scholar]
  23. Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
    2021 On the rise of discourse markers. InAlexander Haselow & Sylvie Hancil (eds.), Studies at the grammar-discourse interface: Discourse markers and discourse-related grammatical phenomena, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.219.01hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.219.01hei [Google Scholar]
  24. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  25. Henkelmann, Peter
    2006 Constructions of equative comparison. Language Typology and Universals (STUF)(). –. 10.1524/stuf.2006.59.4.370
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2006.59.4.370 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hilpert, Martin
    2014Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hu, Yanshan
    2016 ‘X Yeshi (de)’ Yanyu — Jianyu ‘(X) Zhenshi (de)’ Bijiao Yanjiu. ‘The study of X Yeshi (de) — also makes a comparison with X Zhenshi (de)’. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal UniversityMA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Iwasaki, Shoichi & Foong Ha Yap
    2015 Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.04.008 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
    2005Dramatized discourse: The Mandarin Chinese ba-construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.56
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.56 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2022 Sentence-final particles: Sociolinguistic and discourse perspectives. InChu-Ren Huang, Yen-Hwei Lin, I-Hsuan Chen & Yu-Yin Hsu (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of Chinese linguistics, –. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108329019.031
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329019.031 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kiesling, Scott F.
    2022 Stance and stancetaking. Annual Review of Linguistics. –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑031120‑121256
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-121256 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lang, Jun
    2018 “I am not criticizing you”: A constructionist analysis of an indirect speech act. Chinese Language and Discourse(). –. 10.1075/cld.00010.lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00010.lan [Google Scholar]
  33. Leech, Geoffrey
    2014Pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lehmann, Christian
    2015Thoughts on grammaticalization (3rd edn). Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603353
    https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603353 [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1989Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, Zongjiang
    1997 ‘Ye’ De Laiyuan Jiqi Dui ‘Yi’ De Lishi Tihuan. ‘The origin of ye and its historical replacement of yi’. Studies in Language and Linguistics (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, Zhiping
    2012 Biaotai Yu ‘Yeshi’ De Gongneng Leixing Jiqi Yanbian Licheng. ‘Functions and evolution of Yeshi [也是]’. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, Danqing
    2020Cong Yuyan Leixingxue Dao Yuyan Kucang Leixingxue. ‘From linguistic typology to linguistic inventorial typology’. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, Danqing & Xü Liejiong
    2007Huati De Jiegou Yu Gongneng. ‘Topic: Structural and functional analysis’. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, Zhifu & Li Lijuan
    2013 Biaoshi Zeyuan De ‘X Yeshi (De)’. ‘X Yeshi (De) used for complaint’. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Long, Haiping
    2017 Hanyu Tuicexing ‘Wo Kan’ De Xingcheng. ‘On the formation of the conjuring Wo Kan in Modern Chinese’. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences)(). –, .
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lu, Fangzhe
    2017Xiandai hanyu fanyuqi biaoji yanjiu. ‘A study on the counter-expectation markers in Modern Chinese’. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lü, Shuxiang
    2007Xiandai Hanyu Babaici (Zengding Ben). ‘Eight-hundred words of Modern Chinese (revised and enlarged edition)’. Beijing: Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Ma, Zhen
    1982 Shuo ‘Ye’. ‘On Ye’. Studies of the Chinese Language (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Malle, Bertram F., Steve Guglielmo & Andrew E. Monroe
    2014 A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry(). –. 10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.877340 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pan, Xianjun
    2022 Hudong Huayu Biaoji ‘Qiao Ni Shuo De’: Cong Fouding Neirong Dao Fouding Qinggan. ‘Interactive discourse marker Qiao Ni Shuo De: From negation of content to negation of emotion’. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Paul, Waltraud
    2015New perspectives on Chinese syntax. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110338775
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338775 [Google Scholar]
  48. Pons Bordería, Salvador & Maria Estellés Arguedas
    2009 Expressing digression linguistically: Do digressive markers exist?Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sakita, Tomoko I.
    2013 Discourse markers as stance markers: Well in stance alignment in conversational interaction. Pragmatics & Cognition(). –. 10.1075/pc.21.1.04sak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21.1.04sak [Google Scholar]
  50. Schwenter, Scott A.
    2003No and tampoco: A pragmatic distinction in Spanish negation. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00057‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00057-2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Schwenter, Scott A. & Richard Waltereit
    2010 Presupposition accommodation and language change. InKristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, –. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226102.2.75
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.2.75 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
    1986Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Thompson, Sandra A.
    2002 “Object complements” and conversation: towards a realistic account. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.1.05tho [Google Scholar]
  54. Tomasello, Michael
    2003Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2020 Expressions of stance-to-text: discourse management markers as stance markers. Language Sciences. –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101329
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101329 [Google Scholar]
  56. Traugott, Elizabeth. C.
    2022Discourse structuring markers in English. A historical constructionalist perspective on pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.33
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.33 [Google Scholar]
  57. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
    2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wallace, R. Jay
    1994Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Xü, Jiajin
    2015 Discourse markers. InRint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics (vol. 2), –. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Xü, Jingning
    2022Xiandai Hanyu Huayu Qingtai Yanjiu (Xiuding Ben). ‘A study of modality in discourse in Mandarin Chinese (revised edn.)’. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhan, Fangqiong & Sun Chaofen
    2013 A copula analysis of shì in the Chinese cleft construction. Language and Linguistics. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhan, Fangqiong & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
    2015 The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.39.2.06zha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.2.06zha [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhou, Minghua
    2019 ‘Yeshi’ he ‘X Yeshi (de)’ Jiegou De Duo Jiaodu Yanjiu. ‘A multi-angle research of Yeshi and the structure of X Yeshi (de)’. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24053.fan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24053.fan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error