1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Functions of Language
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of A critical redesign of the attitude spectrum
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores the possibility of developing the spectrum (Martin & White 2005) into a comprehensive one for analyzing the evaluation of institutions in institutional discourse. Specifically, it considers explicit evaluation (via inscribed lexis) and implicit evaluation (via lexical metaphor, nested inscribed lexis, flagging cues, resources and factual account) as contributing to the construction of institutional identity and grades these on a scalar cline. The identification and grading of evaluative strategies is concretized by comparing the clarity of attitudinal stance, the distance the reader needs to range across the text for evaluative interpretation and the amount of co-textual/extra-textual information required for evaluative inference. To make possible the unitization and quantification of implicit evaluation, this article further explores variations of lexical metaphor, flagging cues and resources in invoking positive/negative assessments of institutions, and proposes a focus on material processes in analyzing the evaluativeness of ‘factual accounts’. From a theoretical perspective, this article suggests the possibility of positioning evaluative strategies on a scalar cline by following specific principles. It also offers methodological contributions by specifying how to approach implicit evaluation in empirical studies of institutional identity.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24074.wan
2025-10-03
2025-11-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/fol.24074.wan
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ainsworth, Susan & Cynthia Hardy
    2004 Discourse and identities. InDavid Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick & Linda Putnam (eds.), –. 10.4135/9781848608122.n7
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122.n7 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alba-Juez, Laura & Geoff Thompson
    2014 The many faces and phases of evaluation. InGeoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), –. 10.1075/pbns.242.01alb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.01alb [Google Scholar]
  3. Beattie, Vivien, Alpha Dhanani & Michael John Jones
    2008 Investigating presentational change in U.K. annual reports: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Business Communication(). –. 10.1177/0021943607313993
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943607313993 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bednarek, Monika
    2006 Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 2008 ‘An increasingly familiar tragedy’: Evaluative collocation and conflation. Functions of Language(). –. 10.1075/fol.15.1.03bed
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15.1.03bed [Google Scholar]
  6. Breeze, Ruth
    2012 Legitimation in corporate discourse: Oil corporations after Deepwater Horizon. Discourse and Society(). –. 10.1177/0957926511431511
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431511 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ditlevsen, Marianne Grove
    2012 Revealing corporate identities in annual reports. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. –. 10.1108/13563281211253593
     https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281211253593 [Google Scholar]
  8. Don, Alexanne
    2016 “It is hard to mesh all this”: Invoking attitude, persona and argument organisation. Functional Linguistics(). –. 10.1186/s40554‑016‑0033‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0033-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dueñas, Pilar Mur
    2010 Attitude markers in business management research articles: A cross-cultural corpus-driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics(). –. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2009.00228.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00228.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuoli, Matteo
    2012 Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication(). –. 10.1177/1750481311427788
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311427788 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuoli, Matteo & Christopher Hart
    2018 Trust-building strategies in corporate discourse: An experimental study. Discourse & Society(). –. 10.1177/0957926518770264
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770264 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg
    2015 Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpus(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fuoli, Matteo, Jeannette Littlemore & Sarah Turner
    2022 Sunken ships and screaming banshees: Metaphor and evaluation in film reviews. English Language & Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1360674321000046
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000046 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuoli, Matteo & Carita Paradis
    2014 A model of trust-repair discourse. Journal of Pragmatics. –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gergen, Kenneth J., Mary M. Gergen & Frank J. Barrett
    2004 Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. InDavid Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick & Linda Putnam (eds.), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Grant, David, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick & Linda Putnam
    (eds.) 2004 The Sage handbook of organizational discourse. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781848608122
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122 [Google Scholar]
  18. Habermas, Jürgen
    1984 Theory of communicative action, Vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. London: Heinemann.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2004 An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hoey, Michael
    2000 Persuasive rhetoric in linguistics: a stylistic study of some features of the language of Noam Chomsky. InSusan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hood, Susan
    2010 Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230274662
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274662 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hood, Susan & J. R. Martin
    2007 Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. InRuqaiya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language, –. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunston, Susan
    2011 Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson
    (eds.) 2000 Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hyland, Ken
    2005 Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 2009 Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaltenbacher, Martin
    2006 Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: The emotive and the factual — A corpus analysis within the framework of appraisal. InGeoff Thompson & Susan Hunston (eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections, –. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Kövecses, Zoltan
    2002 Metaphor: A practical introduction, 1st edn. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lemke, Jay L.
    1998 Resources for attitudinal meaning: Evaluative orientations in text semantics. Functions of Language(). –. 10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.5.1.03lem [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu, Feifei
    2018 Lexical metaphor as affiliative bond in newspaper editorials: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Functional Linguistics(). –. 10.1186/s40554‑018‑0054‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0054-z [Google Scholar]
  32. Lluch, Sara Vilar
    2022 Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language(). –. 10.1075/fol.21022.vil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21022.vil [Google Scholar]
  33. Macken-Horarik, Mary & Anne Isaac
    2014 Appraising appraisal. InGeoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), –. 10.1075/pbns.242.04mac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.04mac [Google Scholar]
  34. Martin, J. R.
    2000 Beyond exchange: appraisal systems in English. InSusan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 2020 Metaphors we feel by: Stratal tension. Journal of World Languages(). –. 10.1080/21698252.2020.1720158
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2020.1720158 [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin, J. R. & David Rose
    2007 Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Martin, J. R. & P. R. R. White
    2005 The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mauranen, Anna & Marina Bondi
    2003 Editorial: Evaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes(). –. 10.1016/S1475‑1585(03)00045‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00045-6 [Google Scholar]
  39. Moreno, I. Ana & Lorena Suárez
    2008 A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nørgaard, Nina, Rocío Montoro & Beatrix Busse
    2010 Key terms in stylistics. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ochs, Elinor
    1993 Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction(). –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2603_3 [Google Scholar]
  42. Polanyi, Livia
    1989 Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conventional storytelling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Schön, Donald A.
    1993 Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. InAndrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, –. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.011 [Google Scholar]
  44. Swales, John M. & Amy Burke
    2003 It’s really fascinating work: differences in evaluative adjectives across academic registers. InPepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), Corpus analysis, language structure and language use, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1163/9789004334410_002
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334410_002 [Google Scholar]
  45. Thompson, Geoff
    2014 affect and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls: Refining the appraisal model. InGeoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), –. 10.1075/pbns.242.03tho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.03tho [Google Scholar]
  46. Thompson, Geoff & Laura Alba-Juez
    (eds.) 2014 Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.242
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242 [Google Scholar]
  47. Thompson, Geoff & Susan Hunston
    2000 Evaluation: an introduction. InSusan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Thompson, Geoff & Jianglin Zhou
    2000 Evaluative and organization in text: the structuring role of evaluative disjuncts. InSusan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), –. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0007
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tupala, Mira
    2019 Applying quantitative appraisal analysis to the study of institutional discourse: The case of EU migration documents. Functional Linguistics(). –. 10.1186/s40554‑018‑0067‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0067-7 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang, Congcong
    2021 A study of evaluative explicitness in institutional identity construction: A comparative analysis of annual reports of Chinese and British cultural institutions. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Foreign Studies PhD dissertation.
  51. 2022 Attitudinal value of the ideational in institutional discourse: Evidence from annual reports of Hanban and British Council. Corpus Pragmatics(). –. 10.1007/s41701‑021‑00112‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00112-5 [Google Scholar]
  52. Wernick, Andrew
    1991 Promotional culture. London: Sage. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑22346‑6_17
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22346-6_17 [Google Scholar]
  53. White, P. R. R.
    2001 appraisal outline. Manuscript, available online atwww.grammatics.com/appraisal
  54. 2004 Subjectivity, evaluation and point of view in media discourse. InCaroline Coffin, Ann Hewings & Kieran O’Halloran (eds.), Applying English grammar, –. London: Hodder Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 2006 Evaluative semantics and ideological positioning in journalistic discourse — A new framework for analysis. InInger Lassen, Jeanne Strunck & Torben Vestergaard (eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.18.05whi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.18.05whi [Google Scholar]
  56. 2008 Praising and blaming, applauding and disparaging — Solidarity, audience positioning, and the linguistics of evaluative disposition. InGerd Antos & Eija Ventola (eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication, –. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110211399.4.567
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211399.4.567 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2011 Appraisal. InJan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Discursive pragmatics, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.8.02whi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.02whi [Google Scholar]
  58. 2015 Appraisal theory. InKaren Tracy, Cornelia Ilie & Todd Sandel (eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, –. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041 [Google Scholar]
  59. White, P. R. R. & Mohammad Makki
    2016 Crime reporting as storytelling in Persian/Farsi news journalism — Perspectives on the narrative function. Journal of World Languages(). –. 10.1080/21698252.2016.1244407
     https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2016.1244407 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24074.wan
Loading
A critical redesign of the attitude spectrum
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.24074.wan
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24074.wan
/content/journals/10.1075/fol.24074.wan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: explicit evaluation ; implicit evaluation ; institutional identity ; evaluative explicitness ; attitude spectrum

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error